2011年8月23日星期二

光明會審查每一份荷里活劇本

光明會審查每一份荷里活劇本
Illuminati Inspect Every Hollywood Script
August 22, 2011
by Aspen
(The author is a former professional movie critic.)
(henrymakow.com)
Translation by Autumnson Blog
a scene from "V is for Vendetta" -- "The most blatantly honest Illuminati project I have yet viewed."
一個來自“V是怪客”的場景 - “我看過然而是最公然地誠實的光明會項目。


The Illuminati exert influence in popular visual media to an extraordinary extent. Every major film script that is in pre-production mode is submitted to key Illuminati subordinates whose role is to assess the script for potential alterations or insertions. These changes may be major or minor, depending on the material of the script.
光明會加諸影響在流行視覺媒體上至一不平凡的程度,每一部在預產模式的大電影劇本都被呈交至關鍵的光明會下屬,他們的角色是評估劇本以作有潛質的修改或插入,這些變化可大亦可少,取決於劇本的材料。
Additionally, these subordinates comprise a tightly managed think tank which surveys the progress of Illuminati propaganda in global societies. The members make decisions about which themes are ready for further amplification in popular media. Then, detailed descriptions of desired creative projects are handed down to a further subordinate (but not necessarily knowledgeable) group of highly skilled writers, who create the scripts for these projects.
此外,這些下屬包括有一個嚴格管理的智囊團,調查全球社會的光明會宣傳進度,成員作出哪些主題已準備好要在大眾媒體進一步放大的決定。然後,想要的創意項目的詳細描述被遞交至更深一層有高技巧的作家從屬小組(但不一定需要是有見識的),他們為這些項目創作劇本。
Different projects are created to target different sectors of the global population. That may seem logically obvious, but it's worth stating. Grossly blatant Illuminati messages are more often couched in films of excessive violence, sexual content, outright weirdness, and so on, in order to distract viewers from the fact that external ideas are being inserted forcefully into their minds.
不同的項目被創作以針對全球人口的不同界別,那可能看來是邏輯上明顯的,但卻是值得指出的。粗略地公然的光明會訊息是更經常地埋伏在極度暴力、色情內容、古靈精怪、諸如此類的電影中,以分散事實外部思想正大力地植入到觀眾的腦中。
Actually, that's not quite right: excessive violence, and such, activates a psychological openness to the receiving of ideas. The explanation for this is that once a viewer makes the decision to ACCEPT the violence and the sex, and so on, his or her mind remains open to the ideas that the film is meant to insert into their minds.
事實上,那並不是完全正確的:過度暴力及這類,激活一心理上的開放以接受想法。這的解釋是,一旦有位觀眾作出決定接受暴力和色情,及類等,他或她的心靈仍然對想法開放,那是電影要想插入到他們的腦中的。

巧妙的影響
SUBTLE INFLUENCES
Very often, the decision is made not to insert any open messages into film projects. This is due to two very simple rules: too much openness exposes the process; and, gradual influence is far more powerful and effective in the long run. In the event that no open messages are going to be inserted, two other options remain which still allow for gradual influence to build.
很多時候,作出的決定昰不插入任何公開的訊息入電影項目,這是由於兩條非常簡單的規則:太多的公開暴露了程序;及逐步的影響在長期是更為有力和有效的。在沒有公開訊息要被插入的情況下,仍有其它兩項選擇仍然容許漸進的影響建立。
The first is Signature Symbology. The Illuminati have, over time, generated a huge set of symbols and visual icons which, in partnership with the more blatant messages, exert an impressive (some would say frightening) measure of influence on public thought.
首先的是簽名符號,隨著時間過去,光明會已產生一大套的符號和視覺圖標,當中伴隨著更加明目張膽的訊息,施加令人印象深刻(有些人說是可怕的)影響措施在公眾的想法上。
These are the Signatures of Illuminati interference in a project. When viewers see a symbol inserted into a film, this event draws up memories of past encounters with that symbol, and of any messages or themes attached to that symbol.
這些都是項目中光明會簽名的干擾,當觀眾看到一個被插入電影的符號,以該符號、及附加在該符號或主題,勾起過去遭遇的回憶。
This is often what some people call an "unconscious" or "subliminal" process. I call it "unreflective", for the simple reason that most people are just not paying any attention to the influences that affect them deeply.
這往往是有些人所說的“無意識”或“潛意識”的過程,我稱之為“非反射性的”,原因很簡單,大多數人都衹是不注意到對他們影響深刻的影響。
外加圖片:gargoyle 石鬼

Of course everyone wants to leap on the "Illuminati eye" as a blatantly repetitive symbol these days. That's a misguided judgment, and I'll get to that part soon. An example of a less obvious Signature Symbol is the gargoyle. Any film or other production featuring even brief glimpses of gargoyles is announcing that it has the Illuminati stamp of approval.
當然,這些天每一個人都想越過作為一個公然地重複象徵的“光明會眼”。那是一個錯誤的判斷,我會快將來到那部分。一個不太明顯的簽名符號的例子是石鬼。在任何電影或其它作品,即使是石鬼的短暫一瞥,都在宣布它有光明會印戳的批准。
The second option is influence over the music attached to a project. Film music - well, music in general - holds a powerful influence over viewers and listeners. Similar musical themes across various projects excite unreflective (or subliminal) memories even more deeply than do visual symbols.
第二項選擇是附加到項目的音樂影響力,電影音樂 - 嗯,一般音樂 - 對觀眾和聽眾擁有強大的影響力。類似的主題音樂在各個項目激發非反射性(或潛意識)的記憶,甚至比視覺符號更深刻。
One of the tactics of the Illuminati is to present a large set of what we could call Distraction Symbols. The very name "Illuminati" is itself a Distraction Symbol. Distraction Symbols are meant to occupy the attention of both the mildly curious thinkers and the overly excitable conspiracy theorists.

Oftentimes, Distraction Symbols are in fact genuine signature symbols, but the publicly presented meanings of these symbols are well-planned and tightly controlled propaganda. The meanings of Distraction Symbols have been either completely falsified or else skewed just enough to push amateur analysts in the wrong directions.

Let's ask some questions. What do the Illuminati wish to accomplish? What do the subordinate participants in Illuminati projects wish to accomplish? What are the major themes the Illuminati focus on presenting? Why have they selected these particular themes?

誰才是光明會員!
WHO ARE ILLUMINATI?

There is no actual body of persons calling themselves the Illuminati. There DOES exist an actual body of persons telling everyone to CALL them "the Illuminati", but this is not what they call themselves. Nor is their character equal to the propaganda they have sponsored that purportedly describes "the Illuminati".
實際上沒有人稱自己為光明會員,的確存在一班真實的人叫大家稱他們為“光明會”,但這不是他們的自稱,也不是他們的角色相等於他們贊助的宣傳,那據稱是描述“光明會”的。
The most blatantly honest Illuminati project I have yet viewed is V for Vendetta, directed by Jon Turtletaub, left, starring Natalie Portman and Hugo Weaving. By the way, all three of these people are key production elements in major and obvious Illuminati film projects.
我所看過最招搖坦白的光明會項目是V是怪客,由喬恩 Turtletaub(左)執導,主演者是娜塔莉波特曼和雨果織造。順便說一下,所有這三個人都是重大和明顯的光明會電影項目中的關鍵生產要素。
There is a scene in V for Vendetta where the central figures of the film, a man dressed in black and wearing a smiling mask (a Guy Fawkes mask, you can look it up, or watch the film), and a woman named Evie (after Eve, the symbolic Mother of Humankind), perform the following exchange:

Evie: How strange that I suddenly see your face everywhere.... I don't understand.
V: What?
Evie: How you can be one of the most important things that has ever happened to me, and yet I know almost nothing about you. I don't know where you were born, who your parents were, if you had any brothers or sisters... I don't even know what you really look like.
V: There is a face beneath this mask, but it's not me. I am no more that face than the muscles beneath it, or the bones beneath that.

This is Illuminatis' admission that their public representation of themselves is a very deliberate sham. They have intended all along to keep their membership, their ultimate intentions, and their core character as hidden as necessary. Therefore, if we examine what they present in overly forceful ways, we can discover what they are not. Conversely, if we examine their more subtle touches, we can discover what they are willing to admit to - that is, what they MUST admit to, in order to build the future they have planned for Humanity.

Here we come to the issue of SEEDING. This is it. This is what Illuminati influence in public media is all about. The Illuminati are - like it or not - causing and controlling change, globally, but they are not doing that only by means of instigating economic crises and violent international conflicts.

The Illuminati are seeding the public with notions that gradually grow larger and more influential over time. They did it with Feminism; they did it with flexi-sexuality; they are doing it with anti-religion and with child sexualization now. They do this because the future society they have planned must be structured differently from what we all know now. A different structure requires citizens with different thinking who will accept that structure.

http://www.henrymakow.com/aspen.html

沒有留言: