2010年1月6日星期三

Alex Jones和Infowars是否為全球主義者工作?

那個以前在香討A/C屢次被封前以網名Our Life貼D很激的資料,如棺材密碼等,那些資料全是來自Infowars,Infowars去年出了兩套長達兩小時的著名記錄片,本網誌內亦有的'奧巴馬騙局'和'終結遊戲',而兩片內的主持人就是美國極右活躍份子,前CIA特務Alex Jones。

免費翻譯輭件:
http://www.frengly.com/

Alex Jones和Infowars是否為全球主義者工作?
Is Alex Jones and Infowars Working For The Globalists?

Last Updated on Tuesday, 05 January 2010 15:22
Tuesday, 05 January 2010 14:59
News - Latest News

Alex Jones and Infowars have portrayed themslves as patriots and enemies of a global tyranny to be implemented under any New World Order using the UN, WHO and IMF as vehicles.
Alex Jones和Infowars描繪他們自己是愛國者,是以新世界秩序遮蔭下實施全球暴政的敵人,他們以聯合國,世衛和國際貨幣基金會作為交通工具。
However, Infowars recent report on UN plans for gold coins strongly reinforces the notion that the website is actually trying to hide UN plans to move to a global currency - and a New World Order psych op website.
然而,Infowars近期報告關於聯合國的金幣計劃,大力支持加強那概念,網站實際上是試圖掩蓋聯合國所計劃的全球一貨幣-和新世界秩序psych op網站。

Paul Joseph Watson posted a report yesterday on Infowars saying that
the recent announcement by the United Nations that it will begin to mint gold and silver bullion coins bearing the UN logo “is likely to be a hoax, muddying the waters of the very real move towards a global monetary system”.
屈臣昨天貼出一份報告關於Infowars說,

聯合國最近的宣布將開始鑄做有聯合國標誌的金銀幣(註:網誌內有有關報導),“可能會是一個騙局,使真正移向一全球貨幣體系的水變得渾濁“。

http://www.infowars.com/un-gold-hoax-muddies-the-waters-of-real-move-towards-global-currency/

Watson goes on to claim that the story is spread by FBI operatives, ignoring the fact that Infowars was among the first to put it out.

"UN to produce bullion coins as world currency ," was the headline of a story by Dwight Jones on December 31, 2009 posted on Infowars.
So what is Watson actually complaining about when Infowars was one of the first websites to put out the story of the UN's plans to produce bullion coins?

How come it is suddenly a hoax?

The original Dwight Jones story put out by Infowars was uncritical. It suggested the UN bullion coin was inevitable and even reasonable, that is to say, it served to condition people positively to the idea in a low key way.

However, others – including myself – began to ask questions such as where would the gold or even the license come from for the UN to be able to print silver and gold coins?
These critical reports have now come under fire from Watson and attacked as muddying the water

Watson now says there is no evidence that the UN wants to create a world currency.
“There is nothing on the UNCTAD website to verify the authenticity of the story,” Watson writes.

The fact is, the UN trade body, UNCTAD, basedf in Geneva close to WHO, has been calling for stable global exchange rates -- the back door to a UN global currency --- since March 2009 when the FT Deutschland reported on an UNCTAD study calling for stable exchange rates.

http://www.ftd.de/politik/international/:renaissance-fuer-bretton-woods-uno-oekonomen-fuer-neues-waehrungssystem/490034.html


Also, the UNCTAD Trade and Development Report 2009, which can be downloaded from the UNCTAD website, clearly advocates a radical overhaul of the world's financial and monetary system and an agreement among the countries of the world to maintain stable exchange rates along the lines of the European monetary system.

But the European monatery system established in 1979 when some European countries linked their currencies to prevent large fluctuations relative to one another, ultimately led to the creation of the euro with its coins and bank notes, as Wikipedia reports.

ON page 127 of the UNCTAD Trade and Development Report 2009, yoan read:

http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/tdr2009_en.pdf

“The Bretton Woods system and the European Monetary System provide precedents for what could be an appropriate solution to determine exchange rates within a multilateral framework. In these systems, the implicit rule was that the exchange rate of the national currencies with the international currency would be determined by the purchasing power of the currency expressed in all other currencies.“

The How long the UN currency remain gold or silver before it too is transformed into a paper, fiat currency is another question.
Infowars is not interested in exploring this issue or the way the UN is introducing a global currency through the back door as reported in UNCTAD’s own website contrary to Watson's claims.

Infowars is interested in putting out an uncritical report announcing UN bullion coins as a fait accompli – and if others notice the implications, Infowars attacks them, slurring them as FBI informanats, apparently more eager to defend the UN than the truth.

Why?

This report is just one piece of growing evidence that Jones is working for the NWO and his internet news operation is designed as part of a programme to spread fear.
More and more people are noticing that Alex Jones’s always focuses on a problem – but never on the solution.

Just one example.

Alex Jones gave a commentary at New Year about the need for Americans to live up to the ideal of the freemason Founding Father George Washington over Christmas – but Jones never mentions the efforts of the continental congress to restore the constitution, an effort much broader in scope and more important to rebuilding the USA than Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed Bill, which is given acres of space.
And what about the suggestion of moving money to community banks? No mention hardly of that on Infowars.

In spring 2009, Alex Jones was one of the most prominent scare-mongerers over the swine flu virus in the alternative media along with controlled opposition Bill Deagle and True Ott.
Jones had callers into his show talking of millions of infected people in Mexico. He told everyone he was disappearing to his farm if the pandmeic virus ever appeared.

And he only reported on the dangers of the untested swine flu vaccination and the forced vaccination element in pandemic plans after the news had circulated far and wide on the US alternative media network thanks to the work of Dr Rebecca Carley and others like myself.

But we were never given a spot on his show. Our appearance was cancelled on spurious grounds.
Jones never mentioned that I have filed charges against Baxter or that they were being investigated by the police. The impression Jones gives is that the police and army are people’s biggest enemy. This is not true.

Jones call today for people to file petitions and lawsuits against proposals to implement full body scanner s at airports looks great. But a closer look reveals that the real story concerning the Delta airplane bombing -- namely the overwhelming evidence elements in the US government conspired to destroy a plane -- has been pushed out for all the reports on Yemen and body scanners.

http://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-calls-for-mass-resistance-to-implementation-of-body-scanners/

The latest episode of Jesse Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory on the global plot to murder millions through the vaccine was clearly designed to instill fear while giving as little useful information as possible – let alone any real solutions.
This is also true of Jones’s treatment of Climate Gate and the Copenhagen Treaty.

Christopher Monckton’s video clip posted on Youtube in October on the dangers in the Copenhagen Treaty was widely seen before Alex Jones picked up on the story.
The hacked emails became the major, indeed only item, for weeks on Jones website after the entire internet was buzzing with it.

Copenhagen was widely believed to have been a significant failure for the globalists and banksters’s plan to establish the UN system as a global form of government – but Jones perpetuates the view they scored a major success and are just “playing dead”.

The UN and WHO and IMF have been largely ignored by Jones, though it is becoming increasingly clear they are the key vehicles of control.
Jones also presents himself as a champion of 9/11 truth. But is he?

Alex Jones does not, for example, mention Dr Judy Wood and the evidence that directed energy weapons destroyed the twin towers on September 9/11, evidence submitted in a case that has made its way to the Supreme Court.
But it is not just what Jones leave out that is important - but also what he puts in to his shows.

Alex Jones promotes well known counterintelligence agents such as Dr Rima Laibow, wife of retired Major General Albert Stubblebine, head of a US psych op warfare department.

Even David de Rotschild is allowed air time.

He also gives space to less well known ones such as Nigel Farage of the UKIP, widely believed to be another member of the controlled opposition who gives big speeches in European Parliament while consistently blocking any effective action according to party members.

And what about Ron Paul?

Though a medical doctor, his only criticism of the swine flu vaccine campaign made to Russia Today was that the Big US Government could not deliver the vaccine fast enough.
How come Paul, another freemason, could not find a few words to say about the fact the vaccine was untested and toxic ?

Not that Rense is any better. Rense is to Alex Jones what Obama is to Bush. They are just the two sides of the same NWO coin.
They represent the false mainstream/alternative media paradigm.

They work for the same paymasters.
They are there to collect IP addresses, enable them to be put in data bases and matched with addresses and now too with GP coordinates folllowing the census, etc.

They are there to terrify, paralyze, humiliate and bully.
Just now there was a report on Infowars saying 70% of Americans were in favour of invading Yemen.

Who believes that?

But this so-called on line poll gives the impression a consensus has formed and that the invasion of Yemen is inevitable when no consensus has formed and an invasion is not inevitable.

In 2010, the time has come to move forward with constructive proposals for rebuilding the USA and Europe – and the time has come to remove obstacles to their implementation.
And Alex Jones has become an obstacle with his fear mongering and manipulation of information.

The USA is lucky to have people like Dr Rebecca Carley, Dr Robin Falkow and Dr Mercola, among many others, in the alternative media.
They are crticial and informative while being constructive in their approach.

We need fresh news websites, fresh ideas, fresh avenues of communication, real confidence is needed to meet the challenges ahead.
We need a clear visions of what can be accomplished in the coming weeks and months.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Monetary_System

http://www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2470%3Ais-alex-jones-and-infowars-working-for-the-globalists&catid=1%3Alatest-news&Itemid=64&lang=en

沒有留言:

發佈留言