70頁佔領利比亞的北約犯罪計劃洩漏

70頁佔領利比亞的北約犯罪計劃洩漏
Leak of a 70 page Criminal NATO Plan to Occupy Libya
UAE Would Occupy Tripoli in Post-Gadhafi Libya
在後利比亞卡扎菲時代阿聯酋將佔用的黎波里

by Jason Ditz
Global Research, August 9, 2011
Antiwar.com
Translation by Autumnson Blog

West Prepares New State Radio, Mass Arrest of 'Fifth Column' Opponents of Rebel Regime....

A 70-page plan detailing Western designs for the occupation of post-Gadhafi Libya, and apparently signed off on by the political leadership of the rebel Transitional Council in East Libya has been leaked, and paints a grim picture of the new regime NATO is planning on installing after the war.
一份70頁的計劃詳列西方設計佔領後卡扎菲的利比亞已被洩露，及顯然由東利比亞的反叛過渡委員會政治領導層簽署，並描繪一新政權北約在戰後計劃裝置的嚴峻畫面。
The plan includes keeping large portions of the Gadhafian security apparatus intact, with a number of the leaders of the brutal regime’s crackdown left in position on condition of loyalty to the new, pro-West regime.
計劃包括保持大部份卡扎菲的安全架構完好，以效忠新、親西方政權的條件，有一個數字的的野蠻政權鎮壓的領導人保留在位。
Even more controversial will be the “Tripoli task force,” a 15,000-man force operated by the United Arab Emirates which will, after Gadhafi is out of power, occupy the capital city of Tripoli and conduct mass arrests of Gadhafi’s top supporters.

The arrests won’t stop there, as of course they never do for a regime looking to stifle dissent. Indeed the plan also includes discussion of a new state radio network that will broadcast orders to the public to support the new government, and warning anti-Gadhafi factions that haven’t endorsed the new regime to stand down. The assumption in the report is that these factions, termed a “fifth column,” would also be arrested. The new state media will of course be necessitated all the more by the NATO attacks on the existing media.

The Transitional Council confirmed the authenticity of the report, and while the rebel ambassador to the UAE expressed “regret” that the truth had come out he said it was “important that the general public knows there is an advance plan.” It is a plan that likely won’t sit well with the protesters who were demanding democratic reform, nor those NATO members who acquiesced to the war on the assumption that it was doing something other than swapping brutal regimes in Libya.

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25947