2020年8月7日星期五

檢查原片數次,並未發現有火箭落下產生貝魯特的大爆炸

檢查原片數次,並未發現有火箭落下產生貝魯特的大爆炸
💣 ***🇫 🇦 🇰 🇪   🇻 🇩 🇴*** 😊 

⚠️ I have examined the original video dozens of times, concluding that the video I received was created.  And it's really fake. 💥

🎥: Original​ Vdo​... ⚡No rockets launch in this camera view.🙏👍

⏰ August​ 6, 2020

🎥 : #SlowMotion慢動作影片看不到火箭


火箭導致大爆炸的虛假影片




不過有軍事専家指出,這位置的原片拍不到火箭,他更加確定大爆炸是由巡航導彈造成。


=======
Really?

【貝魯特大爆炸之謎】破產貨船流落港口　危險品無人認領　海關警告充耳不聞　硝酸銨貯六年終釀大悲劇
報道全文：https://bit.ly/2Pt153t


Try to imagine the difference in scale between Beirut's 2,750-tonne ammonium nitrate explosion, and Oklahoma City's 2.4-tonne explosion (0.008% of the fuel, that did THIS), and then tell me it had to be a tactical nuke.

Does negligence really extend this far? No one thought to say, "Hey, there's a really big bomb over there? Maybe we should, like, not explode the entire city?"











於

3 則留言:

  1. 匿名2020年8月7日 上午1:39


    https://twitter.com/Bosozokv/status/1252524896870993921

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. Autumnson2020年8月7日 上午1:47

      一睇就知假片,你知不知好多UFO片清楚過這條都係用AI軟件做出來? 不要在我這頁貼垃圾和不相關的東西。

      刪除
  2. 匿名2020年8月7日 上午1:59


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUlbPUo7zRI

    回覆刪除