你不能向部門上報這：“為什麼火星的火衛一是空心的？”

http://www.enterprisemission.com/Phobos.html

你不能向部門上報這：“為什麼火星的火衛一是空心的？”
You Couldn't Make This Up Dept: "Why is Mars' Moon Phobos Hollow?"
May 28, 2010

Mars' Moon Phobos has been analyzed as being one-third hollow according to European Space Agency reports, which has triggered some wild and utterly fascinating rumors and speculation that we've featured below.
火星的火衛一已被分析是三分之一空心的，根據歐洲航天局的報告，它已引發一些古怪和十足地引人入勝的傳聞和猜測，我們已精選一些在下面。
From "The Phobos Blog" -- published on March 25th: General , Science 25 March, 2010 17:21
從“火衛一博客” - 發表於 3月25日：一般，科學 2010年3月25日17:21
Radio science result from 2008 Phobos Flyby now accepted for publication:
無線電科學結果來自 2008年火衛一飛越現在被接受出版：
We report independent results from two subgroups of the Mars Express Radio Science (MaRS) team who independently analyzed Mars Express (MEX) radio tracking data for the purpose of determining consistently the gravitational attraction of the moon Phobos on the MEX spacecraft, and hence the mass of Phobos. We conclude that the interior of Phobos likely contains large voids. When applied to various hypotheses bearing on the origin of Phobos, these results are inconsistent with the proposition that Phobos is a captured asteroid.
我們報告獨立結果來自火星快車電波科學（MaRS）隊的兩個分組，它獨立分析火星快車（MEX）的無線電跟踪數據，旨在決定在MEX航天器上月球火衛一的持續引力，和由此火衛一的質量。我們結論火衛一的內部是可能包含大空隙。當應用至各種假設關於火衛一的起源，這些結果是不一致的，因為有提議火衛一是一顆被捕獲的小行星。

For a Martian moon that is demonstrably "1/3 hollow" ... as measured by two totally independent space programs, and separated by ~20 years ... under any likely astrophysical formation scenario cannot exist as just a "natural" moon. The MARSIS radar imaging experiment -- according to "inside" ESA sources recounted "a Phobos' interior filled with 'cavernous, geometric rooms ... right-angle walls ... and floors -- detectable via the semi-regular 'structure of the returning, interior radar echoes ...' as they were impressed upon the reflected MARSIS signals ....'"
對於火星月亮明顯是“1 / 3空心的”...正如兩個完全獨立的空間項罔所量度，和分開約20年〜...在任何可能的天體物理學形成的版本，也不能存在作為只是一個“天然”的月亮。 MARSIS雷達成像實驗 -- 根據歐空局來源的“內部”講述，“火衛一'內部充滿了'海綿狀、幾何房間 ...直角的牆壁...和地板 -- 檢測通過半正規的 '返回結構，內部雷達回波...'，當他們在反映MARSIS信號 留下深刻印象....'"
MARSIS was physically seeing (via this radar) a three-dimensional, totally artificial, interior world ... within Phobos; and a "reflection void interior geometry" ... which correlated eerily with the earlier (lower-resolution) Phobos "interior gravity tracking data ...." No natural "space rock" could possibly possess such an enormous range of "natural radar absorbers and reflectors"; nothing "natural" could reflect (or absorb) EM energy that way across so many orders of magnitude.
MARSIS是實質地看到（通過這雷達）一個立體的、完全人造的、內部世界...在火衛一內；和一“無效的內部幾何反射”...它怪異地相關先前的（低分辨率）火衛一“內部重力跟踪數據 ...."沒有天然的“太空石頭”可能擁有如此龐大範圍的“自然雷達吸收器和反射器”，沒有“自然”可能反射（或吸收）電磁能量。
In other words -- the MARSIS radar reflections officially published on the official ESA Phobos website... contained explicit scientific data, from multiple perspectives, which strongly "supported the idea that this is what radar echoes would look like, coming back from inside 'a huge ... geometric ... hollow spaceship'
換句話說 - MARSIS雷達正式公佈在歐洲航天局的官方ESA火衛一網站...載有從多角度的明確科學數據，它強烈“支持那想法，即這就是雷達回波會是什麼樣子，從 '一個巨大的 ...幾何 ...空心太空船'的裡面回來
In fact, they were the primary source of the decidedly "internal, 3-D geometric-looking" radar signature.
事實上，它們是斷然的“內部，立體幾何外觀的”雷達簽名的主要來源。
The concurrence of all three of these independent Mars Express experiments -- "imaging" ... "internal mass distribution" (tracking) ... and "internal radar imaging" -- now agreed that "the interior of Phobos is 'partially hollow ... with internal, geometric "voids" inside it ....'" Meaning that- Phobos is artificial.

Source: http://www.enterprisemission.com/Phobos.html

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/05/you-couldnt-make-this-up-european-space-agency-rumors-mars-moon-phobos-is-an-artificial-satellite.html

你不能向部門上報這：“有一件龐然大物在火星的月球火衛一上”