The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged
January 27, 2012
by James Farganne
Translation by Autumnson Blog
Former NSA analyst, Jim Stone, argues that there was no earthquake. The tsunami was caused by nuclear bombs in the sea and the Fukushima explosion and meltdown was caused by mini-nukes hidden in cameras installed by an Israeli security firm. The motive: punish Japan for offering to enrich Iranian uranium and straying from Illuminati diktat. This website reserves judgment but offers this introduction by James Farganne in the spirit of free discussion.
前美國國家安全局分析師吉姆斯通認為並沒有地震，海嘯是由海中的核彈造成，而福島爆炸和熔毀是由以色列安全公司安裝在收藏的攝像頭中的小型核武器所造成。動機：懲罰日本因為提供豐富伊朗的鈾及從光明會的苛刻協定走失。本文網站保留判決，但本著自由討論的精神提供這由詹姆斯Farganne的介紹。
左：兩張槍式核武器的圖顯示出與麥格納 BSP的攝像頭驚人地相似
在福島＃3的爆炸(以色列公司麥格納 BSP“弄了”一部自己的相機在那裡)，與核武器試驗具有驚人的相似。
When we compare the 6.8-magnitude earthquake which devastated Kobe, Japan January 17, 1995 with Fukushima, the evidence does not stack up.
當我們比較1995年1月17日摧毀日本神戶的6.8級地震與福島縣，證據並沒有成為結果。
A quick Google Images search of Kobe reveals incredible destruction of buildings, bridges, elevated highways, and other infrastructure.
一次快速的谷歌圖片神戶搜索，揭示了令人難以置信的建築物、橋樑、高架公路、以及其他基礎設施的破壞。
The Fukushima quake, magnitude 9.0, struck about 70 km off the coast of Japan on March 11, 2011.
震級 9.0的福島地震，2011年3月11日打擊日本海岸約 70公里。
It sent a 30-meter tsunami crashing over perfectly undamaged bridges, houses, roads, and cars -- over a populace which had not been warned of the incoming tsunami, because there was no earthquake. They were taken completely off-guard. Yet helicopters were waiting, and people all over Japan got to watch the tsunami roll in on live TV.
它發送一個 30米的海嘯衝擊完全沒有損壞的橋樑、房屋、道路和汽車 -- 因為沒有地震，對一個尚未被警告海嘯來臨的民眾，他們被帶到完全疏於防範。然而，直升機在等待，及日本各地的人在電視直播觀看海嘯捲進。
What on earth was going on? Ordinarily, the Japanese people are warned of tsunamis. Why weren't they warned? Why was there no structural damage, no reason for them to suspect that a tsunami was coming?
地球上發生了什麼？通常情況下，日本人民會被海嘯警告。他們為什麼不被警告？為什麼會沒有結構性的損害，沒有理由給他們懷疑海嘯在來臨？
The quake must have seemed like nothing special to a nation of people who are used to quakes. In a video taken in one Tokyo newsroom during the Fukushima quake, staff were seen to continue typing at their computer stations, totally unfazed by it.
地震定已看來好像沒有特別，對一個習慣地震的國家人民。在一段取自東京新聞中心於福島地震拍攝的視頻，工作人員被看到繼續在電腦工作站打字，完全未受地震影響。
A 9.0-magnitude earthquake is more than 100 times stronger than a 6.8. A 9.0 should have devastated everything within a 1,000-km radius. There should have been widespread urban carnage, even worse than what Kobe suffered.
一塲 9.0級地震是比6.8級的強 100倍以上。 一場9.0級的應該已蹂爛半徑1,000公里內的一切東西，應該已有廣泛的城市大屠殺，甚至比神户遭受的更嚴重。
Yet the Fukushima quake of 3/11/11 did not cause a single structure to collapse.
然而，2011年3月11日的福島地震並沒有造成單一結構的倒塌。
But don't take my word for it. Go look up the helicopter footage on YouTube. Look at the infrastructure the tsunami was crashing onto. Not the slightest bit of damage. Common sense is enough to make you wonder.
但不要取信我的話，去查看在YouTube上的直升機影片；看看海嘯衝擊的基礎設施，沒有絲毫損害，常識已是足以讓你懷疑。
Jim Stone did more than wonder. He dug up and analyzed the Japanese seismograms. He proved there was no 9.0 quake, and no epicenter out at sea. Instead, there were three simultaneous quakes of much lesser magnitude, all of them inland.
吉姆斯通做得比懷疑更多，他挖掘並分析日本的地震。他證明並沒有 9.0級地震，海上沒有震中。反之，有三次幅度小得多的同時地震，全在內陸。
The authorities lied about the 9.0 quake -- made it up out of whole cloth. An earthquake did not cause the tsunami. There must have been another cause.
當局謊報 9.0級地震 - 從整塊布做出來。地震沒有引起海嘯，一定有另一個原因。
被核武器摧毀的反應堆
It turns out that the official explanation for the Fukushima reactor explosions was bogus as well. Nuclear power containment walls are extremely thick and strong. Hydrogen explosions could never have destroyed them. As a historical reference, hydrogen explosions occurred at Three Mile Island and caused no structural damage, nor even any injuries to plant personnel.
結果是福島反應堆爆炸的官方解釋亦是假的，核電遏制牆是極厚和強壯，氫爆炸從不可能摧毀它們。作為歷史參考，在三哩島發生過氫氣爆炸並沒有造成結構性的破壞，也甚至沒有任何電廠人員受傷。
Furthermore, Reactor Four contained no fuel on 3/11/11, and was therefore nonoperational -- yet it exploded and was destroyed as completely as were the other reactors that day. Reactor Four is like Building 7 at the World Trade Center - an utter impossibility, a blatant smoking gun. A reactor containing no fuel cannot operate; a nonoperational reactor cannot explode unless someone explodes it. The destruction of Reactor Four can only have been the result of sabotage.
此外，四號反應堆於 11年3月11日沒有載有燃料，因此是非運作的 - 然而它爆炸了及被完全摧毀，有如那一天的其它反應堆。四號反應堆像是世界貿易中心的七號樓 - 一個完全的不可能，公然的鐵證。一個不包含燃料的反應堆無法操作;一個非運作的反應堆除非有人引爆它是不會爆炸的。四號反應堆的破壞只有可能是被破壞的結果。
以色列的參與
Israeli Involvement
In February 2010, Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. Soon thereafter, an Israeli firm by the name of Magna BSP secured a contract to run security at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. They installed oversized cameras strongly resembling gun-type nuclear weapons. There is strong evidence that they planted Stuxnet, an Israeli computer virus that attacks Siemens power plant control systems, and which Israel previously used to damage Iran's nuclear program. Magna BSP also established internet data links in the reactor cores, in blatant violation of international nuclear regulations.
All twelve members of that security team returned to Israel in the week before 3/11/11. In the aftermath of the disaster, the Israelis publicly monitored the reactor cores via their illegal internet data links. Yet no one took them to task for this.
吉姆斯通因為揭示真相成為目標
Jim Stone Targeted for Revealing Truth
What caused the tsunami? What destroyed the reactors?
Using skills honed as a former NSA analyst with an engineering background, Jim Stone concluded that Israel was behind the destruction of Fukushima Daiichi. Now he is paying the price.
Stone proved that there was no 9.0-magnitude quake to cause the tsunami. The tsunami must have been artificially induced, perhaps by an atomic bomb placed in the Japan Trench.
The tsunami was blamed for flooding the reactors and causing the explosions. But Stone presents compelling evidence that Israel destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi plant by installing gun-type nuclear weapons in the guise of security cameras, and then setting them off in the tsunami's aftermath.
Stone demonstrates that the Stuxnet virus continues to distort sensor readings at the disaster site to this day.
Unlike many others in the world of whistle blowers, Stone bases his conclusions on hard evidence and unassailable logic. Anyone can review and challenge his work. He is open to it.
Since releasing his report and making several radio appearances to support it, Jim Stone has been harassed, threatened, unlawfully detained, and is currently facing prison time on completely trumped-up charges.
I have watched the reaction to his work on the net. Some have slandered him. Others have railroaded his work.
No one has debunked him yet.
His conclusions have ramifications that make 9/11 pale in significance.
Why, all across the alternative media, this roaring silence on the work of Jim Stone?
Why haven't more truth sites simply linked to his report, directing people to review the evidence and decide for themselves?
Some have expressed suspicion that Stone might not be what he claims to be. That's irrelevant. Facts are facts. The report stands on facts.
If you haven't done so yet, I urge you to study Jim Stone's Fukushima report. It is well worth the considerable time and effort. Then, if you agree that his conclusions are correct, please do your part in spreading this information and dispelling the alternative media's silence on it.
To conclude, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake never happened in Japan on 3/11; the tsunami must have been artificially induced. Nor did hydrogen explosions obliterate containment walls of concrete and rebar several feet thick. The official story is impossible. Israel was punishing Japan, and Zionist operatives now are attempting to destroy Jim Stone, the man who exposed the truth.
http://www.henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html
日本不是被9級地震襲擊？報告宣稱其實是無旗核武器毀滅福島
(英鏈) 秘密的美國和以色列核武器轉讓 導致福島爆炸
日本記者提驚人猜測 日本核電站被疑藏有核武器
印度會忽視對伊朗石油的制裁
日本地震，謊言！
Webbot的福島預測7月10日惡風收割靈魂
沒有留言:
發佈留言