恐怖惡巫騙局事與願違：五角大樓、白宮無法令他們的拉登童話有條理

五角大樓、白宮無法令他們的拉登童話有條理
Pentagon, White House Can’t Get Their Bin Laden Fairy Tale Straight
Terror Boogeyman Hoax Backfires
恐怖惡巫騙局事與願違
Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
May 4, 2011
Translation by Autumnson Blog

The purported Bin Laden raid hoax gets kookier by the minute. The account has already changed multiple times over as the Pentagon and the White House do not seem to be able to get their story straight with each other. The entire debacle is only serving to throw up more questions and create more doubt over the legitimacy of the entire fable.
按每分鐘那可能是真的拉登突擊騙​​局變得更蠢更狂，敘述已經改變許多次在五角大樓和白宮似乎未能互相令他們的故事有條理，整個狂流只是為扔出更多的問題，及在整個寓言的合法性創造更多的疑問。
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters Tuesday “Even I am confused” when he was questioned over the exact details of the Navy SEAL raid on the so called “compound”.
星期二白宮新聞秘書傑伊卡尼對記者說：“即使我也困惑”，當他被質疑有關在該所謂的“複合型”海豹突擊隊襲擊的具體細節。
Carney made of number of revisions to the original account that was relayed Monday by Deputy National Security Adviser John Brennan and other Pentagon officials.
卡尼把原來的敍述作出數次修訂，那在週一由副國家安全顧問約翰布倫南和其他五角大樓官員接替。
While Brennan had said that Bin Laden engaged in a firefight with US commandos and resisted capture, Carney told reporters that the al qaeda leader “was not armed”.
儘管布倫南已說過，本拉登曾參與與美國突擊隊駁火及拒捕；但卡尼告訴過記者，基地組織領導人“沒有武裝”。
“He [bin Laden] was engaged in a firefight with those that entered the area of the house he was in. And whether or not he got off any rounds, I quite frankly don’t know,” Brennan had said Monday. Other pentagon officials told the same story earlier in the day.
“他[拉登]參與一場駁火，與進入他所在房子區域的那些人，及不論是否他有發射多少發，我頗坦率地不知道，”布倫南星期一說；其他五角大樓官員同日較早時候告訴同樣的故事。
When questioned on Tuesday, however, Carney said that “resistance does not require a firearm” but directed questions about how bin Laden “resisted” to the Pentagon. This followed a background, off-camera briefing for television reporters later Monday, during which a senior White House official said bin Laden was not armed when he was killed.
然而當在星期二被問到，卡尼說，“拒捕並不需要槍支”但轉而問題關於本拉登如何對五角大樓“拒捕”。這在週一稍後跟著進行一次給電視記者的背景式、熄相機的簡報，期間一位白宮高級官員說，本拉登在他被殺害的時候是沒有武裝的。
Pakistani officials have even suggested that there wasn’t even a shot fired in the raid, which contradicts the US government assertion that al qaeda henchmen were firing indiscriminately at the special ops team.
巴基斯坦官員已甚至提出，在突擊中甚至沒有發射一槍，那與美國政府聲稱的茅盾，即基地組織追隨者胡亂地對特種部隊射擊。
Details about the use of a woman as a human shield have also been chopped and changed multiple times.
關於一個女人被用作人體盾牌的細節亦被斬切及改變多次。
At a Pentagon briefing early on Monday, a senior defense official said bin Laden was hiding behind a woman so he could get shots away at the US soldiers. “He was firing behind her,” the official said.

This was then expounded upon by Brennan who said Bin Laden was “hiding behind women who were put in front of him as a shield,”

A woman killed in the raid was bin Laden’s wife, Brennan said: “She was positioned in a way that indicated that she was being used as a shield.”

Yet later that account was altered by another Pentagon official who claimed Bin Laden’s wife was “injured but not killed,” and that “A different guy’s wife was killed”.

Then yet another official familiar with the operation said it did not appear that any woman was used as a human shield.

Then Tuesday, Press Secretary Carney said that when Bin Laden was approached, the Al Qaeda leader’s “wife” rushed the US forces. The woman was shot in the leg but not killed, Carney said.

Conveniently, this wife who was dead, but then not dead, has also now identified Bin Laden’s body both to the Navy SEALs and Pakistani authorities. You know, the body they dumped in the sea, and the Pakistani authorities that were not involved, but then were involved and then were not involved again.


Another part of the story that has been revised is Brennan’s assertion that Bin Laden’s son Khalid was killed in the attack. However, the official White House transcript of the on the record briefing states that it was a different son named Hamza, who was killed.
故事已被修訂的另一部分，是布倫南的斷言拉登的兒子哈立德在襲擊中被殺。不過，白宮官方在記錄簡報上的文字記錄指出，它是一個不同名叫哈姆扎的兒子被打死。
Quite why Brennan had gotten these fundamental details wrong is unclear given that he was one of the officials supposedly watching the entire raid via a live video feed.
頗有微言為什麼布倫南已令這些基本的細節錯誤，目前還不清楚，因為他是其中一個官員應有觀看整個突擊通過一條實況視頻。
Here is Brennan’s briefing:
這裡是布倫南的簡報：


Here is Carney’s “revised” account:
這裡是卡尼的“修正“敍述：


Carney also noted that there is a discrepancy in the number of floors raided by the SEAL team inside the luxury mansion “compound”, a description in itself that has since been seriously questioned given that the dwelling had no air conditioning, had damp and growing around it and contained only a small triangular plot of land at the back, according to reporters on the scene.

In addition, the value of the property, originally said to be $1 million dollars, is way off the mark according to property professionals in Abbottabad, who say it is worth less than a quarter of that amount.

In short, it is a less than attractive house that is nothing out of the ordinary for where it is located, which is most likely why the people in the immediate vicinity find it laughable and beyond ridiculous to suggest that they were neighbours of Osama Bin Laden for six years.

Why can’t the government get it’s story straight? Is the White House intentionally muddying the waters to divert attention to the minutia of the event and away from the fact that the entire scenario is on it’s face ludicrous? Or are they just flat out lying through their teeth?
為什麼政府不能令它的故事有條理呢？白宮是否故意弄濁池水，使注意力轉移到該事件的細節並遠離事實，即整個場景在它的面上是荒唐可笑的？或者，他們是否衹在全力以赴穿過他們的牙齒講大話？

Sources: Politico, The Atlantic

http://www.prisonplanet.com/pentagon-white-house-can%E2%80%99t-get-their-bin-laden-fairy-tale-straight.html

奧巴馬目睹拉登被斃遭質疑 作戰25分鐘未直播

擊斃本拉登行動始末

美國解釋為何單獨執行抓捕拉登行動 承認拉登被打死時未攜帶武器

白宮最新的拼命之作 - 視頻顯示拉登在電視上觀看自己 - 衰咗

(英鏈) 騙局：白宮宣稱四年舊拉登視頻為新錄像

假本拉登藝廊！ - 最新的假烏薩馬圖片