醫學雜誌:合法化“出生後流產”,“嬰幼兒並不是人”
Medical Journal: Legalize ‘After-Birth Abortions’, ‘Infants Are Not People’
The Intel Hub
By Alexander Higgins
February 28, 2012
A paper recently published in the Journal of Medical Ethics says that parents should have the right to kill their newborn infants because infants are not people.
一篇最近在醫學倫理學期刊上發表的文章說,家長應該有權殺死他們的新生嬰兒,因為嬰兒並不是人。
A paper in the The Journal of Medical Ethics, an international peer-reviewed journal for health professionals and researchers in medical ethics, argues that murdering newborn infants should be legalized.
一份給衛生專業人員和醫德研究人員的同行評審的國際期刊,即醫學倫理期刋中的一篇論文認為,謀殺新生兒應該被合法化。
The rational? “Infants are not people”.
理由嗎? “嬰兒並不是人”。
出生後流產:嬰兒為什麼應該生存?
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
Please click for further information:
http://theintelhub.com/2012/02/28/medical-journal-legalize-after-birth-abortions-infants-are-not-people/
Ted Turner 催促全球一孩化政策以拯救地球
Virginia Ironside 會願意扼殺一個有病的兒女
科學的美國人:殺死更多嬰兒去拯救地球
Tool Time:巴赫曼擔心一孩政策
我有發言權:約翰荷魯威爾神父 一孩政策
警告!觀看此視頻會降低你的智商 [生育控制]
生物倫理學教授:下毒人口使接受“綠色世界秩序”
The Illuminati, Learned Elders of Zion, Holy Roman Empire & the NWO plus The Simpsons Code. 禍 哉 、 那 些 以 虛 假 之 細 繩 牽 罪 孽 的 人 、 他 們 又 像 以 套 繩 拉 罪 惡 。 說 、 任 他 急 速 行 、 趕 快 成 就 他 的 作 為 、 使 我 們 看 看 . 任 以 色 列 聖 者 所 謀 劃 的 臨 近 成 就 、 使 我 們 知 道 。〔賽 5 18-19〕禍 哉 、 那 些 向 耶 和 華 深 藏 謀 略 的 、 又 在 暗 中 行 事 、 說 、 誰 看 見 我 們 呢 . 誰 知 道 我 們 呢 。〔賽 29 15〕 禍 哉 、 這 悖 逆 的 兒 女 ...要 靠 法 老 的 力 量 ...〔賽 30 1-2〕 禍 哉 、 那 些 下 埃 及 求 幫 助 的...那 作 惡 之 家...〔賽 31 1-2〕那 撒 但 一 會 的 、 自 稱 是 猶 太 人 、 其 實 不 是 猶 太 人 、 乃 是 說 謊 話 的 ...〔啟 3 9〕
2012年2月29日星期三
國際刑警突襲匿名結果以逮捕25名涉嫌黑客告終
International Raids Result in Arrests of 25 Suspected Anonymous Hackers
國際刑警突襲匿名結果以逮捕25名涉嫌黑客告終
The Intel Hub
By Madison Ruppert
February 28, 2012
Twenty-five alleged members of Anonymous were arrested in a worldwide sweep Tuesday, according to Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization.
Anonymous, which The New York Times characterizes as a “loose-knit … hacker movement” cannot actually be defined with any degree of certainty due to the fact that anyone and everyone can call themselves a member of Anonymous.
However, the group has become infamous for organizing and/or taking credit for a series of “hacktivist” operations where entities were deliberately targeted for attack.
In a statement, Interpol said that arrests occurred in Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Spain by national law enforcement personnel who were working with Interpol’s Latin American Working Group of Experts on Information Technology Crime.
The suspects are accused of planning coordinated cyber attacks on various institutions around the world including the Colombian defense ministry and president’s websites, the Endesa electric company of Chile and their national library, and the websites of Spanish political parites, among other targets.
According to the Associated Press, those arrested ranged widely in age from 17-years-old all the way up to 40 and were the result of an ongoing investigation which began in mid-February.
Interpol reports that the investigation has already resulted in searches in 40 locations across 15 cities and the seizure of 250 pieces of “information technology equipment” and cellular phones.
According to police in Spain, four of the 25 individuals arrested were suspected of hacking Spanish political party websites and two servers in Bulgaria and the Czech Republic used by the group have been blocked.
They claim that one of the four individuals arrested was actually the suspected manager of Anonymous computer operations in both Spain and Latin America.
This individual, identified solely by the aliases “Thunder” and “Pacotron” along with his initials, would be quite a high value target if he indeed is the “manager” of such operations.
However, the distributed nature of Anonymous makes me suspicious of any claims that they could catch a “manager” given the non-hierarchical nature of the group and the fact that they would likely avoid putting any inordinate amount of power or information in the hands of just one person.
The four suspects spoken of by the Spanish police are accused of carrying out denial of service (DOS) attacks, defacing websites and publishing data about the police who were assigned to the royal palace and the office of the premier on the internet.
The mainstream media’s coverage of Anonymous has been marked with abject ignorance, but it appears that they have begun to grasp what the group is about and how it is made up.
“Anonymous has no real membership structure. Hackers, activists, and supporters can claim allegiance to its freewheeling principles so it is not clear what impact the arrests will have,” the Associated Press wrote.
The Associated Press coverage mentions talk of a possible revenge attack on the Interpol website and at the time of writing they reported that “the police organization’s home page appeared to be operating normally late Tuesday.”
However, when I attempted to access the page at 8:17 PM Pacific Standard Time on February 28, it was in fact completely offline as confirmed by several services utilizing servers across the world.
Anonymous has been around for quite a while now, although their activities have become growingly political in nature over recent years.
What could be perceived as one of their greatest successes, and thus humiliations for law enforcement, was achieved earlier this month when members of Anonymous were able to listen in on a conference call between the American Federal Bureau of Investigations, Scotland Yard and other foreign police entities.
The call, which you can listen to below, was dealing with the agencies’ joint investigation into Anonymous and similar groups.
ANONYMOUS Intercept FBI & Scotland Yard Conference Call #FFF
匿名截取聯邦調查局及倫敦蘇格蘭場電話會議#FFF
2012-02-03
Anonymous doesn’t seem to be phased by this latest attempt to cripple the group, with one Twitter account claiming to be associated with Anonymous in Brazil said, “Interpol, you can’t take Anonymous. It’s an idea,” according to the Associated Press (I was unable to locate the tweet myself).
Indeed this seems to be something that police agencies around the globe are missing. Arresting a handful of hacktivists isn’t going to do anything, in fact, it will likely just embolden them.
If they really want to stop Anonymous, they’ll have to stop giving Anonymous a reason to do what they are doing.
Previously I have been critical of Anonymous and the related Lulz Security, or LulzSec, group due to the fact that their activities can be used by politicians to fight internet freedom.
Similarly, I see the Anonymous attack on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to be similar in its pointlessness.
The attack, carried out earlier this month, achieved absolutely nothing and only served to give more support to people like Senator John McCain who are pushing to give the National Security Agency and military more control over the internet.
If Anonymous really wants to make a difference I believe that they shouldn’t be adding fuel to the anti-internet freedom fire by carrying out attacks which are best characterized as “skiddie” or “script kiddie” attacks.
http://theintelhub.com/2012/02/28/international-raids-result-in-arrests-of-25-suspected-anonymous-hackers/
國際刑警拘疑「匿名者」25成員
星島日報 –
8小時前
..國際刑警周二證實,在歐洲和南美洲多處地區採取一連串行動,拘捕了25人,懷疑他們是黑客組織「匿名者」(Anonymous)的成員。
國際刑警旗下的拉丁美洲資訊科技罪案專家小組與多個國家和地區的執法部門合作,引用那些國家本身的法例,分別在阿根廷、智利、哥倫比亞和西班牙採取拘捕行動。
被捕者年齡由17至40歲不等。他們涉嫌串通,發動電子攻擊行動,對付不同的政府部門和機構,包括哥倫比亞國防部和總統府網站、智利Endesa電力公司和國立圖書館的電腦系統,還有其他目標。
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E5%88%91%E8%AD%A6%E6%8B%98%E7%96%91-%E5%8C%BF%E5%90%8D%E8%80%85-25%E6%88%90%E5%93%A1-070500403.html
國際刑警突襲“匿名者”駭客組織 逮捕其25名成員
2012-02-29 10:48:42
來源:國際線上專稿
國際線上專稿:據《世界報》2月29日報道,國際刑警組織表示,日前他們在4個國家的15個城市發動大規模突襲行動,25名據稱是駭客組織“匿名者”成員的犯罪嫌疑人被逮捕。
國際刑警組織位於里昂的總部稱,這次行動在阿根廷、智利、哥倫比亞和西班牙展開,主要目的是打擊網路犯罪。除了逮捕25名嫌疑人外,還收繳了250台電腦和手機等設備,以及信用卡和現金。其中,西班牙警方逮捕了4名“匿名者”組織成員,阿根廷警方逮捕了10人,在智利和哥倫比亞分別有6人和5人被捕。
其中,西班牙警方指控4名犯罪嫌疑人公佈了西班牙首相警衛人員以及警方僱員的個人資訊,並攻擊篡改了一些網站的內容。
“匿名者”是一個鬆散的駭客組織,涉嫌攻擊多國政府網站。前不久,他們還竊取了“美國戰略預測”公司的500多萬封內部機密郵件,並將其轉交給了“維基解密”網站。(朱艷)
http://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.cri.cn/27824/2012/02/29/2805s3578055.htm
以色列毀滅了伊朗的核武器計劃 - 維基解密的 Stratfor郵件
2012匿名大報復 - 黑客活躍份子被捕後國際刑警網站倒下(匿名行動中)
國際刑警突襲匿名結果以逮捕25名涉嫌黑客告終
The Intel Hub
By Madison Ruppert
February 28, 2012
Twenty-five alleged members of Anonymous were arrested in a worldwide sweep Tuesday, according to Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization.
Anonymous, which The New York Times characterizes as a “loose-knit … hacker movement” cannot actually be defined with any degree of certainty due to the fact that anyone and everyone can call themselves a member of Anonymous.
However, the group has become infamous for organizing and/or taking credit for a series of “hacktivist” operations where entities were deliberately targeted for attack.
In a statement, Interpol said that arrests occurred in Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Spain by national law enforcement personnel who were working with Interpol’s Latin American Working Group of Experts on Information Technology Crime.
The suspects are accused of planning coordinated cyber attacks on various institutions around the world including the Colombian defense ministry and president’s websites, the Endesa electric company of Chile and their national library, and the websites of Spanish political parites, among other targets.
According to the Associated Press, those arrested ranged widely in age from 17-years-old all the way up to 40 and were the result of an ongoing investigation which began in mid-February.
Interpol reports that the investigation has already resulted in searches in 40 locations across 15 cities and the seizure of 250 pieces of “information technology equipment” and cellular phones.
According to police in Spain, four of the 25 individuals arrested were suspected of hacking Spanish political party websites and two servers in Bulgaria and the Czech Republic used by the group have been blocked.
They claim that one of the four individuals arrested was actually the suspected manager of Anonymous computer operations in both Spain and Latin America.
This individual, identified solely by the aliases “Thunder” and “Pacotron” along with his initials, would be quite a high value target if he indeed is the “manager” of such operations.
However, the distributed nature of Anonymous makes me suspicious of any claims that they could catch a “manager” given the non-hierarchical nature of the group and the fact that they would likely avoid putting any inordinate amount of power or information in the hands of just one person.
The four suspects spoken of by the Spanish police are accused of carrying out denial of service (DOS) attacks, defacing websites and publishing data about the police who were assigned to the royal palace and the office of the premier on the internet.
The mainstream media’s coverage of Anonymous has been marked with abject ignorance, but it appears that they have begun to grasp what the group is about and how it is made up.
“Anonymous has no real membership structure. Hackers, activists, and supporters can claim allegiance to its freewheeling principles so it is not clear what impact the arrests will have,” the Associated Press wrote.
The Associated Press coverage mentions talk of a possible revenge attack on the Interpol website and at the time of writing they reported that “the police organization’s home page appeared to be operating normally late Tuesday.”
However, when I attempted to access the page at 8:17 PM Pacific Standard Time on February 28, it was in fact completely offline as confirmed by several services utilizing servers across the world.
Anonymous has been around for quite a while now, although their activities have become growingly political in nature over recent years.
What could be perceived as one of their greatest successes, and thus humiliations for law enforcement, was achieved earlier this month when members of Anonymous were able to listen in on a conference call between the American Federal Bureau of Investigations, Scotland Yard and other foreign police entities.
The call, which you can listen to below, was dealing with the agencies’ joint investigation into Anonymous and similar groups.
ANONYMOUS Intercept FBI & Scotland Yard Conference Call #FFF
匿名截取聯邦調查局及倫敦蘇格蘭場電話會議#FFF
2012-02-03
Anonymous doesn’t seem to be phased by this latest attempt to cripple the group, with one Twitter account claiming to be associated with Anonymous in Brazil said, “Interpol, you can’t take Anonymous. It’s an idea,” according to the Associated Press (I was unable to locate the tweet myself).
Indeed this seems to be something that police agencies around the globe are missing. Arresting a handful of hacktivists isn’t going to do anything, in fact, it will likely just embolden them.
If they really want to stop Anonymous, they’ll have to stop giving Anonymous a reason to do what they are doing.
Previously I have been critical of Anonymous and the related Lulz Security, or LulzSec, group due to the fact that their activities can be used by politicians to fight internet freedom.
Similarly, I see the Anonymous attack on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to be similar in its pointlessness.
The attack, carried out earlier this month, achieved absolutely nothing and only served to give more support to people like Senator John McCain who are pushing to give the National Security Agency and military more control over the internet.
If Anonymous really wants to make a difference I believe that they shouldn’t be adding fuel to the anti-internet freedom fire by carrying out attacks which are best characterized as “skiddie” or “script kiddie” attacks.
http://theintelhub.com/2012/02/28/international-raids-result-in-arrests-of-25-suspected-anonymous-hackers/
國際刑警拘疑「匿名者」25成員
星島日報 –
8小時前
..國際刑警周二證實,在歐洲和南美洲多處地區採取一連串行動,拘捕了25人,懷疑他們是黑客組織「匿名者」(Anonymous)的成員。
國際刑警旗下的拉丁美洲資訊科技罪案專家小組與多個國家和地區的執法部門合作,引用那些國家本身的法例,分別在阿根廷、智利、哥倫比亞和西班牙採取拘捕行動。
被捕者年齡由17至40歲不等。他們涉嫌串通,發動電子攻擊行動,對付不同的政府部門和機構,包括哥倫比亞國防部和總統府網站、智利Endesa電力公司和國立圖書館的電腦系統,還有其他目標。
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E5%88%91%E8%AD%A6%E6%8B%98%E7%96%91-%E5%8C%BF%E5%90%8D%E8%80%85-25%E6%88%90%E5%93%A1-070500403.html
國際刑警突襲“匿名者”駭客組織 逮捕其25名成員
2012-02-29 10:48:42
來源:國際線上專稿
國際線上專稿:據《世界報》2月29日報道,國際刑警組織表示,日前他們在4個國家的15個城市發動大規模突襲行動,25名據稱是駭客組織“匿名者”成員的犯罪嫌疑人被逮捕。
國際刑警組織位於里昂的總部稱,這次行動在阿根廷、智利、哥倫比亞和西班牙展開,主要目的是打擊網路犯罪。除了逮捕25名嫌疑人外,還收繳了250台電腦和手機等設備,以及信用卡和現金。其中,西班牙警方逮捕了4名“匿名者”組織成員,阿根廷警方逮捕了10人,在智利和哥倫比亞分別有6人和5人被捕。
其中,西班牙警方指控4名犯罪嫌疑人公佈了西班牙首相警衛人員以及警方僱員的個人資訊,並攻擊篡改了一些網站的內容。
“匿名者”是一個鬆散的駭客組織,涉嫌攻擊多國政府網站。前不久,他們還竊取了“美國戰略預測”公司的500多萬封內部機密郵件,並將其轉交給了“維基解密”網站。(朱艷)
http://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.cri.cn/27824/2012/02/29/2805s3578055.htm
以色列毀滅了伊朗的核武器計劃 - 維基解密的 Stratfor郵件
2012匿名大報復 - 黑客活躍份子被捕後國際刑警網站倒下(匿名行動中)
NASA確定了新的小行星2011 AG5威脅,在30年時間'可擊中地球'
Nasa Identifies New Asteroid Threat Which 'Could Hit Earth' In 30 Years' Time
NASA確定了新的小行星威脅,在30年時間'可擊中地球'
2012-02-28
It is 460ft wide and soaring through space - on a possible collision course with Earth.
它是的460英尺闊及穿過太空翱翔 - 在一可能與地球碰撞的航程。
Nasa has identified a new asteroid threat to our planet and calculated that it could potentially impact on February 5th 2040.
美國宇航局已經確定對我們地球的新的小行星威脅,並計算出它有潛質在2040年2月5日撞擊。
The 2011 AG5 has already attracted the concern of the UN Action Team on near-Earth objects, which has begun discussing ways to divert it.
2011 AG5已經吸引了聯合國近地天體行動小組的關注,它已經開始討論如何將它轉移。
Asteroid 2011AG5 could strike Earth in 2040
小行星2011 AG5可能在2040年襲擊地球
2012-02-27
Scientists Talking About How To Deflect ASTEROID 2011 AG5
科學家們談論如何轉移小行星2011 AG5
2012-02-27
NASA確定了新的小行星威脅,在30年時間'可擊中地球'
2012-02-28
It is 460ft wide and soaring through space - on a possible collision course with Earth.
它是的460英尺闊及穿過太空翱翔 - 在一可能與地球碰撞的航程。
Nasa has identified a new asteroid threat to our planet and calculated that it could potentially impact on February 5th 2040.
美國宇航局已經確定對我們地球的新的小行星威脅,並計算出它有潛質在2040年2月5日撞擊。
The 2011 AG5 has already attracted the concern of the UN Action Team on near-Earth objects, which has begun discussing ways to divert it.
2011 AG5已經吸引了聯合國近地天體行動小組的關注,它已經開始討論如何將它轉移。
Asteroid 2011AG5 could strike Earth in 2040
小行星2011 AG5可能在2040年襲擊地球
2012-02-27
Scientists Talking About How To Deflect ASTEROID 2011 AG5
科學家們談論如何轉移小行星2011 AG5
2012-02-27
美中部喬普林布蘭登的龍捲風警告
Tornado warning joplin brandon feb 28 march 1 2012
喬普林布蘭登的龍捲風警告 2012年02月28日至3月1日
2012-02-28
明尼蘇達州2012年2月26日嚴重雪災警告
在龍捲風接近的時候女子祈禱使之遠離?
多於50龍捲風 - 整個市鎮不見了!
喬普林布蘭登的龍捲風警告 2012年02月28日至3月1日
2012-02-28
明尼蘇達州2012年2月26日嚴重雪災警告
在龍捲風接近的時候女子祈禱使之遠離?
多於50龍捲風 - 整個市鎮不見了!
美國:公司可買到的最佳政府?
America: the best government the corporations can buy?
美國:公司可買到的最佳政府?
2012-02-28
Congress: "The best government money can buy"
國會:“錢可以買到的最佳政府”
2010-10-20
美國:公司可買到的最佳政府?
2012-02-28
Congress: "The best government money can buy"
國會:“錢可以買到的最佳政府”
2010-10-20
數千水母在德州沖上岸
Thousands of jelly fish wash ashore in Texas - mass animal deaths continue
數千水母在德州沖上岸 - 大規模動物死亡繼續
2012-02-27
數千水母在德州沖上岸 - 大規模動物死亡繼續
2012-02-27
美國樣樣也是非法的 (長片)
以利秋的葡萄園 Autumnson's Vineyard
美國樣樣也是非法的
John Stossel's Illegal Everything
This Stossel special will blow your mind! The government, especially the EPA is out of control as well as local prosecutors trying to make a name for themselves.
這套Stossel特輯將給你的頭腦一擊!政府特別是環保局是已失控,以及地方檢察官試圖成名。
美國樣樣也是非法的
John Stossel's Illegal Everything
This Stossel special will blow your mind! The government, especially the EPA is out of control as well as local prosecutors trying to make a name for themselves.
這套Stossel特輯將給你的頭腦一擊!政府特別是環保局是已失控,以及地方檢察官試圖成名。
成千上萬海豚逃離加州海岸
Thousands Of Dolphins Flee California Coast 2012
成千上萬海豚逃離加州海岸 2012年
2012-02-27
Dolphin Mega-Pod Makes Waves Off California - 23rd February 2012.wmv
加州外海巨型海豚群做浪 - 2012年2月23日.wmv
2012-02-26
Nibiru 警告2012年3月22日的視頻 (flashback)
成千上萬海豚逃離加州海岸 2012年
2012-02-27
Dolphin Mega-Pod Makes Waves Off California - 23rd February 2012.wmv
加州外海巨型海豚群做浪 - 2012年2月23日.wmv
2012-02-26
Nibiru 警告2012年3月22日的視頻 (flashback)
2012年2月28日星期二
伊朗可能批准進入軍事研究地點 - 特使往訪原子能機構
Iran may grant access to military research sites - envoy to IAEA
伊朗可能批准進入軍事研究地點 - 特使往訪原子能機構
2012-02-27
伊朗可能批准進入軍事研究地點 - 特使往訪原子能機構
2012-02-27
西班牙是否下一個希臘?
Is Spain the next Greece?
西班牙是否下一個希臘?
2012-02-27
Students and teachers in Spain have packed the streets of Valencia, angry at cuts to the education system by their government. They are also angry about harsh and brutal tactics used by police there at previous rallies when dozens were beaten and arrested. Spain is facing an out-of-control deficit and despite many across-the-board cuts, it slated for many more - in the realm of 40 billion Euros or 53 billion dollars.
西班牙的學生和教師已充斥華倫西亞街道,對他們政府削減教育系統生氣,他們亦生氣警方在過去集會時使用苛刻和殘酷的戰術,有數十人被毆打和拘捕。西班牙正面對著赤字失控,及儘管許多跨委員會的削減,它預定有更多 - 在40億歐元或53億美元的範圍中。
西班牙是否下一個希臘?
2012-02-27
Students and teachers in Spain have packed the streets of Valencia, angry at cuts to the education system by their government. They are also angry about harsh and brutal tactics used by police there at previous rallies when dozens were beaten and arrested. Spain is facing an out-of-control deficit and despite many across-the-board cuts, it slated for many more - in the realm of 40 billion Euros or 53 billion dollars.
西班牙的學生和教師已充斥華倫西亞街道,對他們政府削減教育系統生氣,他們亦生氣警方在過去集會時使用苛刻和殘酷的戰術,有數十人被毆打和拘捕。西班牙正面對著赤字失控,及儘管許多跨委員會的削減,它預定有更多 - 在40億歐元或53億美元的範圍中。
日本櫻島火山一系列的大爆發;林孔德拉別哈要甦醒了
2/27/2012 -- Series of LARGE eruptions at Sakurajima Volcano - Japan
2012年2月27日 - 日本櫻島火山一系列的大爆發
2012-02-26
哥斯達黎加林孔德拉別哈的新爆發
New Eruptions at Rincon de la Vieja in Costa Rica
By Erik Klemetti
February 27, 2012 | 7:41 am
It has been almost exactly 14 years since the last eruptive period for Rincón de la Vieja in Costa Rica, but it looks like the volcano might be awakening from its break. Last Thursday (Feb. 22), the volcano experienced two small explosions in the early morning. Seismic records suggest the volcano also had small explosions on Feb. 19 and 20, according to the OVSICORI report for Feb. 25 (PDF).
哥斯達黎加的林孔德拉別哈自上次噴發期已經幾乎整整14年,但它看起來像是可能從休息覺醒的火山。上週四(2月22日),火山在清晨經歷兩次小爆發。地震記錄提出,火山於2月19日和20日亦有小爆發,根據2月25日OVSICORI的報告(PDF格式)。
None of the explosions caused any damage to anything near the volcano and there are no reports of ash fall other than in the crater itself. These explosions are very similar in style to the September 2011 explosions that were like phreatic in nature — that is, not new magma but superheated water generated the explosions. Of course, it is likely that new magma intruding the volcano is the heat source for the water, but these explosions could precede a new magmatic eruption by months or years (or lead to nothing at all). The volcano sits within a national park in Costa Rica and after these explosions, the National Emergency Commission has declared the crater area off-limits to visitors.
The last major eruption from Rincón de la Vieja was in 1966, when it produced at VEI 3 event that generated pyroclastic flows. All the way back in circa 1820 B.C., the volcano produced the Río Blanco tephra from a larger VEI 4 eruption. The summit of the volcano hosts a small crater lake (see above), which could potentially add to the initial explosivity of any eruption as the water interacts with erupting magma. There are also abundant mudpots and springs within the national park as well, attesting to the persistent geothermal activity in the area. This geothermal activity is the reason why the Costa Rican government is looking to build a 200 MW geothermal energy plant in the National Park as well.
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/new-eruptions-at-rincon-de-la-vieja-in-costa-rica/
日本櫻島火山巨大爆發!必看!
日本櫻島火山 - 三年來最大的爆發
哥斯達黎加:圖里亞爾瓦火山爆發“黃色”警報 (聲爆來源證實)
2012年2月27日 - 日本櫻島火山一系列的大爆發
2012-02-26
哥斯達黎加林孔德拉別哈的新爆發
New Eruptions at Rincon de la Vieja in Costa Rica
By Erik Klemetti
February 27, 2012 | 7:41 am
It has been almost exactly 14 years since the last eruptive period for Rincón de la Vieja in Costa Rica, but it looks like the volcano might be awakening from its break. Last Thursday (Feb. 22), the volcano experienced two small explosions in the early morning. Seismic records suggest the volcano also had small explosions on Feb. 19 and 20, according to the OVSICORI report for Feb. 25 (PDF).
哥斯達黎加的林孔德拉別哈自上次噴發期已經幾乎整整14年,但它看起來像是可能從休息覺醒的火山。上週四(2月22日),火山在清晨經歷兩次小爆發。地震記錄提出,火山於2月19日和20日亦有小爆發,根據2月25日OVSICORI的報告(PDF格式)。
None of the explosions caused any damage to anything near the volcano and there are no reports of ash fall other than in the crater itself. These explosions are very similar in style to the September 2011 explosions that were like phreatic in nature — that is, not new magma but superheated water generated the explosions. Of course, it is likely that new magma intruding the volcano is the heat source for the water, but these explosions could precede a new magmatic eruption by months or years (or lead to nothing at all). The volcano sits within a national park in Costa Rica and after these explosions, the National Emergency Commission has declared the crater area off-limits to visitors.
The last major eruption from Rincón de la Vieja was in 1966, when it produced at VEI 3 event that generated pyroclastic flows. All the way back in circa 1820 B.C., the volcano produced the Río Blanco tephra from a larger VEI 4 eruption. The summit of the volcano hosts a small crater lake (see above), which could potentially add to the initial explosivity of any eruption as the water interacts with erupting magma. There are also abundant mudpots and springs within the national park as well, attesting to the persistent geothermal activity in the area. This geothermal activity is the reason why the Costa Rican government is looking to build a 200 MW geothermal energy plant in the National Park as well.
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/new-eruptions-at-rincon-de-la-vieja-in-costa-rica/
日本櫻島火山巨大爆發!必看!
日本櫻島火山 - 三年來最大的爆發
哥斯達黎加:圖里亞爾瓦火山爆發“黃色”警報 (聲爆來源證實)
聯邦緊急事務管理局為安置“流離失所公民”的應急營地招標
聯邦緊急事務管理局為安置“流離失所公民”的應急營地放出招標
FEMA Puts Out Contract For Emergency Camps to House “Displaced Citizens”
Solicitation calls for camps to be ready for occupancy within 72 hours
為營地作懇請招標可準備72小時內入住
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, February 27, 2012
Translation by Autumnson Blog
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is looking for contractors to construct temporary emergency camps inside the United States which can be ready for occupancy within a 72 hour time period and used to house emergency responders as well as “displaced citizens”.
聯邦緊急事務管理署(FEMA)正在尋求承辦商,來在美國境內建造臨時的緊急營地,那可在72小時的時段內入住及被用於安置應急反應隊以及“流離失所的公民”。
The National Responder Support Camp contract, posted on the Federal Business Opportunities website, calls on contractors to “provide all necessary supervision, professional staff, labor support, material, supplies and equipment as necessary to make a RSC within a disaster-impacted area anywhere within the CONUS (Continental United States) within 72 hours after notification.”
國家反應者支持營的合同,在聯邦商業機會的網站上發布,要求合約商“提供一切必要的監管、專業工作人員、勞工支持、材料、用品和設備,如所需般於通知後72小時內在CONUS(美國大陸)的災害影響區域中,造出一個反應者支持營(RSC)。“
The camps are primarily designed to house emergency responders, but will also be utilized to shelter “displaced citizens,” who will be “given the first opportunities for employment within the camp,” according to the solicitation. The camps will be able to service up to 2,000 people at one time.
根據招標,營地主要是設計來安置應急反應隊員,但也將被用來庇護“流離失所的公民,他們”將被給予“在營地內的第一就業機會,營地將能夠一次過服務達2,000人。
As well as natural disasters, the 72-hour camps are designed to deal with terrorist attacks, National Response Framework activities of federal agencies, National Special Security Events, “or any other situation where FEMA or an agency working through FEMA needs a RSC.”
以及自然災害,72小時的營地是專門用來處理恐怖襲擊、聯邦機構的國家反應框架活動、國家特別安全事件,“或任何其它情況下,聯邦緊急措施署或透過聯邦緊急事務管理局工作有需要反應者支持營的機構。”
The camps will be secured with fencing and barricades that will also serve to create areas that are “off limits” to certain occupants. Entry to the camp will be controlled through a photo ID system for all occupants and visitors.
營地將以圍欄和路障関緊,也將有助於建立地區作為對某些居住者的“禁區”。所有住客和訪客的營地進入將通過一個照片身份證系統進行控制。
Medical treatment facilities, dining facilities, mobile showers and “morale welfare and recreation” facilities are all required as part of the contract.
FEMA’s latest efforts to satisfy the demand for emergency camps represents a continuation of preparations on behalf of the federal government to prepare for civil emergencies and potential social disorder.
Last December, Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano directed ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to prepare for a mass influx of immigrants into the United States, calling for the plan to deal with the “shelter” and “processing” of large numbers of people.
In 2006, Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root was contracted by Homeland Security to build detention centers designed to deal with “an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S,” or the rapid development of unspecified “new programs” that would require large numbers of people to be interned.
Last year we received a leaked memo from a state government employee detailing KBR’s efforts to hire subcontractors to provide services required for temporary “emergency environment” camps located in five regions of the United States, indicating that many of the camps have now been constructed and are ready for use.
The construction of new detention camps inside the United States has provoked fears that the facilities could also be used to intern American citizens in the aftermath of a national emergency.
Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the Mexican/US border, the same pretense used in the language of the KBR request for services.
During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign military commanders to take over state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens determined by the government to be “national security threats.”
A provision within the National Defense Authorization Act, signed into law by President Obama on New Years Eve, hands the government power to have American citizens arrested and detained without trial.
http://www.infowars.com/fema-puts-out-contract-for-emergency-camps-to-house-displaced-citizens/
震驚視頻 - FEMA棺木、集中營、萬人坑
集中營活起來了:聯邦緊急措施署尋求承包商在所有50個州提供“臨時營地服務”
是否奇怪FEMA要買一億四千萬包只有36個月保質期的餐包,為一指定的災難局面嗎?
FEMA Puts Out Contract For Emergency Camps to House “Displaced Citizens”
Solicitation calls for camps to be ready for occupancy within 72 hours
為營地作懇請招標可準備72小時內入住
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, February 27, 2012
Translation by Autumnson Blog
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is looking for contractors to construct temporary emergency camps inside the United States which can be ready for occupancy within a 72 hour time period and used to house emergency responders as well as “displaced citizens”.
聯邦緊急事務管理署(FEMA)正在尋求承辦商,來在美國境內建造臨時的緊急營地,那可在72小時的時段內入住及被用於安置應急反應隊以及“流離失所的公民”。
The National Responder Support Camp contract, posted on the Federal Business Opportunities website, calls on contractors to “provide all necessary supervision, professional staff, labor support, material, supplies and equipment as necessary to make a RSC within a disaster-impacted area anywhere within the CONUS (Continental United States) within 72 hours after notification.”
國家反應者支持營的合同,在聯邦商業機會的網站上發布,要求合約商“提供一切必要的監管、專業工作人員、勞工支持、材料、用品和設備,如所需般於通知後72小時內在CONUS(美國大陸)的災害影響區域中,造出一個反應者支持營(RSC)。“
The camps are primarily designed to house emergency responders, but will also be utilized to shelter “displaced citizens,” who will be “given the first opportunities for employment within the camp,” according to the solicitation. The camps will be able to service up to 2,000 people at one time.
根據招標,營地主要是設計來安置應急反應隊員,但也將被用來庇護“流離失所的公民,他們”將被給予“在營地內的第一就業機會,營地將能夠一次過服務達2,000人。
As well as natural disasters, the 72-hour camps are designed to deal with terrorist attacks, National Response Framework activities of federal agencies, National Special Security Events, “or any other situation where FEMA or an agency working through FEMA needs a RSC.”
以及自然災害,72小時的營地是專門用來處理恐怖襲擊、聯邦機構的國家反應框架活動、國家特別安全事件,“或任何其它情況下,聯邦緊急措施署或透過聯邦緊急事務管理局工作有需要反應者支持營的機構。”
The camps will be secured with fencing and barricades that will also serve to create areas that are “off limits” to certain occupants. Entry to the camp will be controlled through a photo ID system for all occupants and visitors.
營地將以圍欄和路障関緊,也將有助於建立地區作為對某些居住者的“禁區”。所有住客和訪客的營地進入將通過一個照片身份證系統進行控制。
Medical treatment facilities, dining facilities, mobile showers and “morale welfare and recreation” facilities are all required as part of the contract.
FEMA’s latest efforts to satisfy the demand for emergency camps represents a continuation of preparations on behalf of the federal government to prepare for civil emergencies and potential social disorder.
Last December, Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano directed ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to prepare for a mass influx of immigrants into the United States, calling for the plan to deal with the “shelter” and “processing” of large numbers of people.
In 2006, Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root was contracted by Homeland Security to build detention centers designed to deal with “an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S,” or the rapid development of unspecified “new programs” that would require large numbers of people to be interned.
Last year we received a leaked memo from a state government employee detailing KBR’s efforts to hire subcontractors to provide services required for temporary “emergency environment” camps located in five regions of the United States, indicating that many of the camps have now been constructed and are ready for use.
The construction of new detention camps inside the United States has provoked fears that the facilities could also be used to intern American citizens in the aftermath of a national emergency.
Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the Mexican/US border, the same pretense used in the language of the KBR request for services.
During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign military commanders to take over state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens determined by the government to be “national security threats.”
A provision within the National Defense Authorization Act, signed into law by President Obama on New Years Eve, hands the government power to have American citizens arrested and detained without trial.
http://www.infowars.com/fema-puts-out-contract-for-emergency-camps-to-house-displaced-citizens/
震驚視頻 - FEMA棺木、集中營、萬人坑
集中營活起來了:聯邦緊急措施署尋求承包商在所有50個州提供“臨時營地服務”
是否奇怪FEMA要買一億四千萬包只有36個月保質期的餐包,為一指定的災難局面嗎?
如果你服用口服維他命D,你必須避免做出這嚴重的錯誤
如果你服用口服維他命D,你必須避免做出這嚴重的錯誤
If You Take Oral Vitamin D You MUST Avoid Making This Serious Mistake
Dr. Mercola
February 23 2012
Translation by Autumnson Blog
Did you know there are two types of vitamin D, and they are NOT interchangeable?
你知道有兩種類型的維他命D嗎,而它們是不可互相交換的?
In fact, taking the wrong one could do you more harm than good...
事實上,服用了錯誤的一種可能是弊多於利...
Drisdol is a synthetic form of vitamin D2—made by irradiating fungus and plant matter—and is the form of vitamin D typically prescribed by doctors.
Drisdol是一種合成形式的維他命D2 - 由輻照真菌和植物物質製造 - 及是一種典型地由醫生處方的維他命D形式。
This is not the type produced by your body in response to sun or safe tanning bed exposure, which is vitamin D3.
這不是那類型由你的身體回應接觸陽光或安全曬黑床所生產的,這即是維他命D3。
A recent meta-analysis by the Cochrane Databasei looked at mortality rates for people who supplemented their diets with D2 versus those who did so with D3, the form naturally produced by your body, highlighting the significant differences between the two.
最近一項由科克倫Databasei的表示變異分析,看看以D2補充他們的飲食對那些以D3 - 你身體自然產生的形式 - 這樣做的人們的死亡率,來突出兩者之間的重大差異。
The analysis of 50 randomized controlled trials, which included a total of 94,000 participants, showed:
其中包括共有94,000名參加者,作50個隨機對照試驗的分析,結果表明:
•A six percent relative risk reduction among those who used vitamin D3, but
•在那些使用維他命D3的人之中,有六%相對風險的減少,但
•A two percent relative risk increase among those who used D2
•在那些使用D2的人,有2%相對風險的增加
According to the Vitamin D Councilii:
據維他命D Councilii:
"You would think a paper that took a look at tens of thousands of subjects and analyzed the efficacy of prescription vitamin D (D2) and over-the-counter vitamin D (D3) would warrant a news story or two.
To my knowledge, these papers are the first to paint such a clear picture about the efficacy between D3 and D2.
While there may be explanations for D3's superiority other than improved efficacy, for the time being, these papers send doctors a message: use D3, not D2."
雖然可能有解釋維他命D3改善療效之外的優勢,目前是,這些文件發送一條消息給醫生:使用D3,而不是D2“
補充性的維他命D2和D3之間的差異
The Difference Between Supplemental Vitamin D2 and D3
The notion that vitamin D2 and D3 were equivalent was based on decades-old studies of rickets prevention in infants. Today, we know a lot more about vitamin D, and the featured study offers compelling support for the recommendation to take vitamin D3 if you need to take an oral supplement—which is the same type of D vitamin created in your body when you expose your skin to sunlight.
維他命D2和D3是等同的概念,是建基在嬰幼兒佝僂病預防的幾十年久的研究。今天,我們知道很多關於維他命D,和功能的研究提供強有力的支持,特別是如果你需要服用口服補充劑,給建議服用維他命D3,那即是當你暴露你的皮膚在陽光下時,在你身體創造的同類型維他命D。
Supplemental vitamin D comes in two forms:
1.Ergocalciferol (vitamin D2)
2.Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
I personally recommend getting your vitamin D from safe sun exposure (or a safe tanning bed), as there's compelling reason to believe the vitamin D created in your skin in response to sun exposure has some slight but important differences that make it even more beneficial than supplemental vitamin D3. I will address this more in just a moment, but first, let's review the differences between the two types of supplemental vitamin D. Aside from the featured findings that supplemental vitamin D3 reduced the relative mortality risk by six percent, while D2 actually INCREASED mortality risk by two percent, the two types differ in the following ways:
•According to the latest research, D3 is approximately 87 percent more potentiii in raising and maintaining vitamin D concentrations and produces 2- to 3-fold greater storage of vitamin D than does D2.
•Regardless of which form you use, your body must convert it into a more active form, and vitamin D3 is converted 500 percent faster than vitamin D2.
•Vitamin D2 also has a shorter shelf life, and its metabolites bind poorly with proteins, further hampering its effectiveness.
飲食的來源如何?動物基對植物基的維他命D
What about Dietary Sources? Animal-Based versus Plant-Based Vitamin D
Aside from taking an oral vitamin D supplement, you can also obtain small amounts of vitamin D from your diet. Here too, it's important to realize that not all food sources provide the same kind of vitamin D. Plant sources provide you with D2. The more beneficial D3 can only be had through animal-based sources such as:
•Fish, such as salmon, mackerel, tuna and sardines
•Egg yolk
•Raw milk
Dairy processors producing pasteurized milk have also been fortifying milk with vitamin D since 1933. Today, about 98 percent of the milk supply in the U.S. is fortified with approximately 400 International Units (IU) of vitamin D per quart. While dairies used to fortify their milk with vitamin D2, most have now switched over to D3. But, if you still drink pasteurized milk (which I don't recommend), check the label to see which form of vitamin D has been added. (If you drink raw milk, then you're getting the naturally-occurring vitamin D in the milk fat.) Keep in mind that although milk is fortified, other dairy products such as cheese and ice cream does typically not contain added vitamin D.
維他命D能製造或破壞你的健康,所以取對的一種!
Vitamin D Can Make or Break Your Health, So Get the Right Kind!
There's overwhelming evidence that vitamin D is a key player in your overall health. This is understandable when you consider that it is not "just" a vitamin; it's actually a neuroregulatory steroidal hormone that influences nearly 3,000 different genes in your body. Receptors that respond to the vitamin have been found in almost every type of human cell, from your brain to your bones.
有過半證據表明,維他命D是你整體健康的關鍵球員,這是可以理解當你認為它不“衹”是一種維他命;它實際上是一種調控的神經甾體激素,影響你身體中近3,000個不同的基因。回應維他命的受體已在幾乎每一類型的人體細胞發現,從你的大腦至你的筋骨。
Just one example of an important gene that vitamin D up-regulates is your ability to fight infections, as well as chronic inflammation. It produces over 200 antimicrobial peptides, the most important of which is cathelicidin, a naturally occurring broad-spectrum antibiotic. This is one of the explanations for why it can be so effective against colds and influenza.
一個重要基因的衹是其中一個例子是,維他命D上調是你抵抗感染以及慢性炎症的能力。它生產超過200抗菌肽,其中最重要的是抗菌肽,一種自然地發生中的闊光譜抗生素。這就是其中一個解釋為什麼它可以對預防感冒及流感如此有效。
Optimizing your vitamin D levels should be at the top of the list for virtually everyone, regardless of your age, sex, color, or health status, as vitamin D deficiency has been linked to an astonishingly diverse array of common chronic diseases, such as:
優化你的維生素D水平應該是在列表的頂部,給幾乎每個人,不論你的年齡、性別、膚色、或健康狀況,正如維他命D缺乏症已被聯繫到一個驚人的常見慢性疾病的多樣化列,例如:
優化你的維他命D水平的理想方法
The IDEAL Way to Optimize Your Vitamin D Levels
While this article is focused on the two types of oral vitamin D supplementation, it's important to realize that the IDEAL way to optimize your vitamin D levels is through appropriate sun or safe tanning bed exposure. While your skin does create vitamin D3 in response to sun light, which is theoretically the same as the D3 you get from an oral supplement, there's cause to believe that the vitamin D created from sun exposure may have additional health benefits, and here's why:
•When you expose your skin to the sun, your skin also synthesizes high amounts of cholesterol sulfate, which is very important for heart and cardiovascular health. In fact, according to research by Dr. Stephanie Seneff, high LDL and subsequent heart disease may in fact be a symptom of cholesterol sulfate deficiency. Sulfur deficiency also promotes obesity and related health problems like diabetes
•When exposed to sunshine, your skin also synthesizes vitamin D3 sulfate. This form of vitamin D is water soluble, unlike oral vitamin D3 supplements, which is unsulfated. The water-soluble form can travel freely in your bloodstream, whereas the unsulfated form needs LDL (the so-called "bad" cholesterol) as a vehicle of transport. According to Dr. Stephanie Seneff, there's reason to believe that many of the profound benefits of vitamin D are actually due to the vitamin D sulfate. As a result, she suspects that the oral non-sulfated form of vitamin D might not provide all of the same benefits, because it cannot be converted to vitamin D sulfate
•You cannot overdose when getting your vitamin D from sun exposure, as your body has the ability to self-regulate and only make what it needs
So essentially, getting regular sun exposure has much greater health ramifications than "just" raising your vitamin D levels and preventing infections. Sun exposure also appears to play a role in heart and cardiovascular health, and much more!
If you cannot get your vitamin D requirements from sun exposure, I recommend using a safe tanning bed (one with electronic ballasts rather than magnetic ballasts, to avoid unnecessary exposure to EMF fields). Safe tanning beds also have less of the dangerous UVA than sunlight, while unsafe ones have more UVA than sunlight. If neither of these are feasible options, then you should take an oral vitamin D3 supplement. It will certainly be better than no vitamin D at all.
你應該服用多少維他命D?
How Much Vitamin D Should You Take?
Some 40 leading vitamin D experts from around the world currently agree that there's no specific dosage level at which "magic" happens; rather the most important factor when it comes to vitamin D is your serum level (the level of vitamin D in your blood). So you really should be taking whatever dosage required to obtain a therapeutic level of vitamin D in your blood.
That said, based on the most recent research by GrassrootsHealth—an organization that has greatly contributed to the current knowledge on vitamin D through their D* Action Study—it appears as though most adults need about 8,000 IU's of vitamin D a day in order to raise their serum levels above 40 ng/ml.4 For children, many experts agree they need about 35 IU's of vitamin D per pound of body weight.
At the time GrassrootsHealth performed the studies that resulted in this dosage recommendation, the optimal serum level was believed to be between 40 to 60 ng/ml. Since then, the optimal vitamin D level has been raised to 50-70 ng/ml, and when treating cancer or heart disease, as high as 70-100 ng/ml, as illustrated in the chart above.
What this means is that even if you do not regularly monitor your vitamin D levels (which you should), your risk of overdosing is going to be fairly slim even if you take as much as 8,000 IU's a day. However, the only way to determine your optimal dose is to get your blood tested regularly, and adjust your dosage to maintain that goldilocks' zone.
For more information, including an in-depth explanation of everything you need to know before you get tested, please see Test Values and Treatment for Vitamin D Deficiency.
References:
i Vitamin D Supplementation for Prevention of Mortality in Adults, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, July 6, 2011: (7); CD007470, G. Bjelakovic, et al.
ii Meta-analysis Looks at Efficacy of D2 vs D3, Vitamin D Council, November 16, 2011: Dr. John Cannell.
iii Vitamin D3 Is More Potent Than Vitamin D2 in Humans, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, March 1, 2011: 96 (3); E447-E452, Robert P. Heaney, et al.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/02/23/oral-vitamin-d-mistake.aspx?e_cid=20120223-a3-ProductTest-1
If You Take Oral Vitamin D You MUST Avoid Making This Serious Mistake
Dr. Mercola
February 23 2012
Translation by Autumnson Blog
Did you know there are two types of vitamin D, and they are NOT interchangeable?
你知道有兩種類型的維他命D嗎,而它們是不可互相交換的?
In fact, taking the wrong one could do you more harm than good...
事實上,服用了錯誤的一種可能是弊多於利...
Drisdol is a synthetic form of vitamin D2—made by irradiating fungus and plant matter—and is the form of vitamin D typically prescribed by doctors.
Drisdol是一種合成形式的維他命D2 - 由輻照真菌和植物物質製造 - 及是一種典型地由醫生處方的維他命D形式。
This is not the type produced by your body in response to sun or safe tanning bed exposure, which is vitamin D3.
這不是那類型由你的身體回應接觸陽光或安全曬黑床所生產的,這即是維他命D3。
A recent meta-analysis by the Cochrane Databasei looked at mortality rates for people who supplemented their diets with D2 versus those who did so with D3, the form naturally produced by your body, highlighting the significant differences between the two.
最近一項由科克倫Databasei的表示變異分析,看看以D2補充他們的飲食對那些以D3 - 你身體自然產生的形式 - 這樣做的人們的死亡率,來突出兩者之間的重大差異。
The analysis of 50 randomized controlled trials, which included a total of 94,000 participants, showed:
其中包括共有94,000名參加者,作50個隨機對照試驗的分析,結果表明:
•A six percent relative risk reduction among those who used vitamin D3, but
•在那些使用維他命D3的人之中,有六%相對風險的減少,但
•A two percent relative risk increase among those who used D2
•在那些使用D2的人,有2%相對風險的增加
According to the Vitamin D Councilii:
據維他命D Councilii:
"You would think a paper that took a look at tens of thousands of subjects and analyzed the efficacy of prescription vitamin D (D2) and over-the-counter vitamin D (D3) would warrant a news story or two.
To my knowledge, these papers are the first to paint such a clear picture about the efficacy between D3 and D2.
While there may be explanations for D3's superiority other than improved efficacy, for the time being, these papers send doctors a message: use D3, not D2."
雖然可能有解釋維他命D3改善療效之外的優勢,目前是,這些文件發送一條消息給醫生:使用D3,而不是D2“
補充性的維他命D2和D3之間的差異
The Difference Between Supplemental Vitamin D2 and D3
The notion that vitamin D2 and D3 were equivalent was based on decades-old studies of rickets prevention in infants. Today, we know a lot more about vitamin D, and the featured study offers compelling support for the recommendation to take vitamin D3 if you need to take an oral supplement—which is the same type of D vitamin created in your body when you expose your skin to sunlight.
維他命D2和D3是等同的概念,是建基在嬰幼兒佝僂病預防的幾十年久的研究。今天,我們知道很多關於維他命D,和功能的研究提供強有力的支持,特別是如果你需要服用口服補充劑,給建議服用維他命D3,那即是當你暴露你的皮膚在陽光下時,在你身體創造的同類型維他命D。
Supplemental vitamin D comes in two forms:
1.Ergocalciferol (vitamin D2)
2.Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
I personally recommend getting your vitamin D from safe sun exposure (or a safe tanning bed), as there's compelling reason to believe the vitamin D created in your skin in response to sun exposure has some slight but important differences that make it even more beneficial than supplemental vitamin D3. I will address this more in just a moment, but first, let's review the differences between the two types of supplemental vitamin D. Aside from the featured findings that supplemental vitamin D3 reduced the relative mortality risk by six percent, while D2 actually INCREASED mortality risk by two percent, the two types differ in the following ways:
•According to the latest research, D3 is approximately 87 percent more potentiii in raising and maintaining vitamin D concentrations and produces 2- to 3-fold greater storage of vitamin D than does D2.
•Regardless of which form you use, your body must convert it into a more active form, and vitamin D3 is converted 500 percent faster than vitamin D2.
•Vitamin D2 also has a shorter shelf life, and its metabolites bind poorly with proteins, further hampering its effectiveness.
飲食的來源如何?動物基對植物基的維他命D
What about Dietary Sources? Animal-Based versus Plant-Based Vitamin D
Aside from taking an oral vitamin D supplement, you can also obtain small amounts of vitamin D from your diet. Here too, it's important to realize that not all food sources provide the same kind of vitamin D. Plant sources provide you with D2. The more beneficial D3 can only be had through animal-based sources such as:
•Fish, such as salmon, mackerel, tuna and sardines
•Egg yolk
•Raw milk
Dairy processors producing pasteurized milk have also been fortifying milk with vitamin D since 1933. Today, about 98 percent of the milk supply in the U.S. is fortified with approximately 400 International Units (IU) of vitamin D per quart. While dairies used to fortify their milk with vitamin D2, most have now switched over to D3. But, if you still drink pasteurized milk (which I don't recommend), check the label to see which form of vitamin D has been added. (If you drink raw milk, then you're getting the naturally-occurring vitamin D in the milk fat.) Keep in mind that although milk is fortified, other dairy products such as cheese and ice cream does typically not contain added vitamin D.
維他命D能製造或破壞你的健康,所以取對的一種!
Vitamin D Can Make or Break Your Health, So Get the Right Kind!
There's overwhelming evidence that vitamin D is a key player in your overall health. This is understandable when you consider that it is not "just" a vitamin; it's actually a neuroregulatory steroidal hormone that influences nearly 3,000 different genes in your body. Receptors that respond to the vitamin have been found in almost every type of human cell, from your brain to your bones.
有過半證據表明,維他命D是你整體健康的關鍵球員,這是可以理解當你認為它不“衹”是一種維他命;它實際上是一種調控的神經甾體激素,影響你身體中近3,000個不同的基因。回應維他命的受體已在幾乎每一類型的人體細胞發現,從你的大腦至你的筋骨。
Just one example of an important gene that vitamin D up-regulates is your ability to fight infections, as well as chronic inflammation. It produces over 200 antimicrobial peptides, the most important of which is cathelicidin, a naturally occurring broad-spectrum antibiotic. This is one of the explanations for why it can be so effective against colds and influenza.
一個重要基因的衹是其中一個例子是,維他命D上調是你抵抗感染以及慢性炎症的能力。它生產超過200抗菌肽,其中最重要的是抗菌肽,一種自然地發生中的闊光譜抗生素。這就是其中一個解釋為什麼它可以對預防感冒及流感如此有效。
Optimizing your vitamin D levels should be at the top of the list for virtually everyone, regardless of your age, sex, color, or health status, as vitamin D deficiency has been linked to an astonishingly diverse array of common chronic diseases, such as:
優化你的維生素D水平應該是在列表的頂部,給幾乎每個人,不論你的年齡、性別、膚色、或健康狀況,正如維他命D缺乏症已被聯繫到一個驚人的常見慢性疾病的多樣化列,例如:
優化你的維他命D水平的理想方法
The IDEAL Way to Optimize Your Vitamin D Levels
While this article is focused on the two types of oral vitamin D supplementation, it's important to realize that the IDEAL way to optimize your vitamin D levels is through appropriate sun or safe tanning bed exposure. While your skin does create vitamin D3 in response to sun light, which is theoretically the same as the D3 you get from an oral supplement, there's cause to believe that the vitamin D created from sun exposure may have additional health benefits, and here's why:
•When you expose your skin to the sun, your skin also synthesizes high amounts of cholesterol sulfate, which is very important for heart and cardiovascular health. In fact, according to research by Dr. Stephanie Seneff, high LDL and subsequent heart disease may in fact be a symptom of cholesterol sulfate deficiency. Sulfur deficiency also promotes obesity and related health problems like diabetes
•When exposed to sunshine, your skin also synthesizes vitamin D3 sulfate. This form of vitamin D is water soluble, unlike oral vitamin D3 supplements, which is unsulfated. The water-soluble form can travel freely in your bloodstream, whereas the unsulfated form needs LDL (the so-called "bad" cholesterol) as a vehicle of transport. According to Dr. Stephanie Seneff, there's reason to believe that many of the profound benefits of vitamin D are actually due to the vitamin D sulfate. As a result, she suspects that the oral non-sulfated form of vitamin D might not provide all of the same benefits, because it cannot be converted to vitamin D sulfate
•You cannot overdose when getting your vitamin D from sun exposure, as your body has the ability to self-regulate and only make what it needs
So essentially, getting regular sun exposure has much greater health ramifications than "just" raising your vitamin D levels and preventing infections. Sun exposure also appears to play a role in heart and cardiovascular health, and much more!
If you cannot get your vitamin D requirements from sun exposure, I recommend using a safe tanning bed (one with electronic ballasts rather than magnetic ballasts, to avoid unnecessary exposure to EMF fields). Safe tanning beds also have less of the dangerous UVA than sunlight, while unsafe ones have more UVA than sunlight. If neither of these are feasible options, then you should take an oral vitamin D3 supplement. It will certainly be better than no vitamin D at all.
你應該服用多少維他命D?
How Much Vitamin D Should You Take?
Some 40 leading vitamin D experts from around the world currently agree that there's no specific dosage level at which "magic" happens; rather the most important factor when it comes to vitamin D is your serum level (the level of vitamin D in your blood). So you really should be taking whatever dosage required to obtain a therapeutic level of vitamin D in your blood.
That said, based on the most recent research by GrassrootsHealth—an organization that has greatly contributed to the current knowledge on vitamin D through their D* Action Study—it appears as though most adults need about 8,000 IU's of vitamin D a day in order to raise their serum levels above 40 ng/ml.4 For children, many experts agree they need about 35 IU's of vitamin D per pound of body weight.
At the time GrassrootsHealth performed the studies that resulted in this dosage recommendation, the optimal serum level was believed to be between 40 to 60 ng/ml. Since then, the optimal vitamin D level has been raised to 50-70 ng/ml, and when treating cancer or heart disease, as high as 70-100 ng/ml, as illustrated in the chart above.
What this means is that even if you do not regularly monitor your vitamin D levels (which you should), your risk of overdosing is going to be fairly slim even if you take as much as 8,000 IU's a day. However, the only way to determine your optimal dose is to get your blood tested regularly, and adjust your dosage to maintain that goldilocks' zone.
For more information, including an in-depth explanation of everything you need to know before you get tested, please see Test Values and Treatment for Vitamin D Deficiency.
References:
i Vitamin D Supplementation for Prevention of Mortality in Adults, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, July 6, 2011: (7); CD007470, G. Bjelakovic, et al.
ii Meta-analysis Looks at Efficacy of D2 vs D3, Vitamin D Council, November 16, 2011: Dr. John Cannell.
iii Vitamin D3 Is More Potent Than Vitamin D2 in Humans, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, March 1, 2011: 96 (3); E447-E452, Robert P. Heaney, et al.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/02/23/oral-vitamin-d-mistake.aspx?e_cid=20120223-a3-ProductTest-1
以色列毀滅了伊朗的核武器計劃 - 維基解密的 Stratfor郵件
Israel ruined Iran's nuke plans - WikiLeaked Stratfor mails
以色列毀滅了伊朗的核武器計劃 - 維基解密的 Stratfor郵件
2012-02-27
Earlier, it came to light that Israel might have already destroyed Iranian nuclear sites and that preparations for a military attack on Tehran are well under way. It's from millions of emails allegedly hacked from the US intelligence think-tank Stratfor, and revealed by WikiLeaks.
此前曝光了以色列可能已經摧毀伊朗的核站,而對伊朗軍事攻擊的籌備工作正在進行中。這是來自數以百萬計的電子郵件,據稱黑自美國情報智庫Stratfor,及由維基解密透露。
'CIA feeds us bad info on Iran nukes' - IAEA ex-head
“中情局就伊朗核武器方面以壞資訊餵飼我們” - 前國際原子能機構主管
2012-02-27
過期警告:“對伊朗核威脅的恐慌已經過時”
與伊朗戰爭?由你決定
國際刑警突襲匿名結果以逮捕25名涉嫌黑客告終
以色列毀滅了伊朗的核武器計劃 - 維基解密的 Stratfor郵件
2012-02-27
Earlier, it came to light that Israel might have already destroyed Iranian nuclear sites and that preparations for a military attack on Tehran are well under way. It's from millions of emails allegedly hacked from the US intelligence think-tank Stratfor, and revealed by WikiLeaks.
此前曝光了以色列可能已經摧毀伊朗的核站,而對伊朗軍事攻擊的籌備工作正在進行中。這是來自數以百萬計的電子郵件,據稱黑自美國情報智庫Stratfor,及由維基解密透露。
'CIA feeds us bad info on Iran nukes' - IAEA ex-head
“中情局就伊朗核武器方面以壞資訊餵飼我們” - 前國際原子能機構主管
2012-02-27
過期警告:“對伊朗核威脅的恐慌已經過時”
與伊朗戰爭?由你決定
國際刑警突襲匿名結果以逮捕25名涉嫌黑客告終