Wayne Madsen: 中央情報局、莫薩德和索羅斯在維基解密背後

CIA, Mossad and Soros behind Wikileaks
中央情報局、莫薩德和索羅斯在維基解密背後29 Novembre 2010
Wayne Madsen
Translation by Autumnson Blog

WMR has learned from Asian intelligence sources that there is a strong belief in some Asian countries, particularly China and Thailand, that the website Wikileaks, which purports to publish classified and sensitive documents while guaranteeing anonymity to the providers, is linked to U.S. cyber-warfare and computer espionage operations, as well as to Mossad’s own cyber-warfare activities.
WMR已從亞洲情報來源知悉，在一些亞洲國家有一堅強的信念，特別是中國和泰國，維基解密網站 聲稱公佈的機密和敏感文件，同時對提供者保證不會透露姓名，是與美國的網絡戰和電腦間諜活動、以及莫薩德自己的網絡戰活動有聯繫。
Wikileaks claims to have decrypted video footage of a U.S. Predator air strike on civilians in Afghanistan and that covert U.S. State Department agents followed Wikileaks’s editor from Iceland to Norway in a surveillance operation conducted jointly by the United States and Iceland. Iceland’s financially-strapped government recently announced a policy of becoming a haven for websites that fear political oppression and censorship in their home countries. However, in the case of Wikileaks, countries like China and Thailand are suspicious of the websites’ actual “ownership.”
維基解密聲稱已解密在阿富汗的美國捕食者空襲平民的錄像，和宣稱隱蔽的美國國務院特工從冰島到挪威跟踪維基解密的編輯，在一項由美國和冰島聯合進行的監視行動。冰島的財政拮据政府最近宣布一項政策，變成一個避風港，給予網站恐懼政治性的壓迫和在屬國的審查。然而，在維基解密的個案，國家如中國和泰國都在懷疑網站的實際“擁有權。”
Wikileaks says it intends to show its video at an April 5 press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC but that its presenters may be detained or arrested before that time. WMR’s sources believe the Wikileaks “militancy” in the face of supposed surveillance appears fake.
維基解密說它企圖展顯示它的視頻，在一4月5日華盛頓首都全國新聞俱樂部的新聞發布會，但說它的主持人可能在那之前被拘留或逮捕。WMR的消息來源相信，維基解密的"交戰狀態"在假設的監視面貌似乎是偽做的。
Our Asian intelligence sources report the following: “Wikileaks is running a disinformation campaign, crying persecution by U.S. intelligence- when it is U.S. intelligence itself. Its [Wikileaks'] activities in Iceland are totally suspect.” Wikileaks claims it is the victim of a new COINTELPRO [Counter Intelligence Program] operation directed by the Pentagon and various U.S. intelligence agencies. WMR’s sources believe that it is Wikileaks that is part and parcel of a cyber-COINTELPRO campaign, such as that proposed by President Obama’s “information czar,” Dr. Cass Sunstein.
我們在亞洲的情報來源報告如下：“維基解密正在經營一項假情報攻勢，喊叫美國情報部門的迫害 - 當它是美國情報本身，它在冰島的[維基解密]活動是完全可疑。“維基解密聲稱是一個新的COINTELPRO[反情報計劃]行動的受害者，由五角大樓和美國多個情報機構指示。WMR的消息來源相信，維基解密是一部分，和是一個網絡-COINTELPRO活動的一塊，正如那由奧巴馬總統的“信息沙皇”卡斯博士森斯坦提出的。
In January 2007, John Young, who runs Cryptome, a site that publishes a wealth of sensitive and classified information, left Wikileaks, claiming the operation was a CIA front. Young also published some 150 email messages sent by Wikileaks activists on cryptome. They include a disparaging comment about this editor by Wikileaks co-founder Dr. Julian Assange of Australia. Assange lists as one of his professions “hacker.” His German co-founder of Wikileaks uses a pseudonym, “Daniel Schmitt.”

Wikileaks claims it is “a multi-jurisdictional organization to protect internal dissidents, whistleblowers, journalists and bloggers who face legal or other threats related to publishing” [whose] primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we are of assistance to people of all nations who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations. We aim for maximum political impact. We have received over 1.2 million documents so far from dissident communities and anonymous sources.”

In China, Wikileaks is suspected of having Mossad connections. It is pointed out that its first “leak” was from an Al Shabbab “insider” in Somalia. Al Shabbab is the Muslim insurgent group that the neocons have linked to “Al Qaeda.”

Asian intelligence sources also point out that Assange’s “PhD” is from Moffett University, an on-line diploma mill and that while he is said to hail from Nairobi, Kenya, he actually in from Australia where his exploits have included computer hacking and software piracy.

WMR has confirmed Young’s contention that Wikileaks is a CIA front operation. Wikileaks is intimately involved in a $20 million CIA operation that U.S.-based Chinese dissidents that hack into computers in China. Some of the Chinese hackers route special hacking program through Chinese computers that then target U.S. government and military computer systems. After this hacking is accomplished, the U.S. government announces through friendly media outlets that U.S. computers have been subjected to a Chinese cyber-attack. The “threat” increases an already-bloated cyber-defense and offense budget and plays into the fears of the American public and businesses that heavily rely on information technology.

It is also pointed out that on Wikileaks advisory board is Ben Laurie, a one-time programmer and Internet security expert for Google, which recently signed a cooperative agreement with the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) and has been charged by China with being part of a U.S. cyber-espionage campaign against China. Other Wikileaks advisory members are leading Chinese dissidents, including Wan Dan, who won the 1998 National Endowment for Democracy (NED) Democracy Award; Wang Youcai, founder of the Chinese Democracy Party; Xiao Qiang, the director of the China Internet Project at the University of California at Berkeley, member of the advisory board of the International Campaign for Tibet, and commentator on the George Soros-affiliated Radio Free Asia; and Tibetan exile and activist Tashi Namgyal Khamsitsang.

Our sources in Asia believe that Wikileaks ran afoul of their CIA paymasters after it was discovered that some of Wikileaks’s “take” was being diverted to Mossad instead of to their benefactors at Langley. After a CIA cur-off in funding, “Daniel Schmitt” took over and moved the Wikileaks operation to Belgium and Sweden with hopes of making a more secure base in Iceland.

There are strong suspicions that Wikileaks is yet another Soros-funded “false flag” operation on the left side of the political spectrum. WMR has learned that after former Senator Norm Coleman (R-MN) decided to oppose Soros’s choice of UN Secretary General Kofi Annan’s deputy Mark Malloch Brown as President of the World Bank, succeeding the disgraced Paul Wolfowitz, Soros put the Wikileaks operation into high gear. “Daniel Schmitt” hacked into Coleman’s supporters list, stealing credit card info, addresses, and publishing the “take” on Wikileaks. Democrat Al Franken, who was strongly backed by Soros, defeated Coleman in a legally-contested and very close election.

It is also believed by informed sources that Soros is behind the operation to move Wikileaks to Iceland. By becoming a power in Iceland, Soros can prevent Icelanders from paying back the British and Dutch investors in Icelandic online Ponzi scheme banking and continue his all-out war against British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who has, in turn, targeted Soros for betting against pound sterling.

Iceland is classic prey for Soros. The Icelandic krona has been decimated as a currency and has no where to go but up in value, especially if the British pound and the euro depreciate. Soros is currently talking down the euro, planning its fall and shorting it, just like he did versus the pound in London in the 1980s. After the UK’s and Europe’s currencies are devalued, Soros will buy every Euro note in sight, thus making trillions.

Soros and his Wikileaks friends have in Iceland a practically unregulated banking system desperate for an influx of capital — money that will come from the exiled Russian tycoons in Israel, London and the United States. Israeli investors like Bank Leumi, and awash in siphoned-off Bernard Madoff cash, will do their bit for this smash-and-grab operation by Soros’s Quantum-linked hedge funds.

With Wikileaks firmly ensconced in Iceland, the “brave” and much-heralded information leakers will run an international blackmail operation against Soros’s foes and launch computer break-ins against Soros’s business rivals and non-Quantum banks. Wikileaks will be used as the info-hitmen against President Obama’s and Rahm Emanuel’s enemies in the 2012 re-election campaign.

From Iceland, Soros will be well-positioned to gain control over the massive mineral resources under the melting ice sheet of Greenland. Under the ice are the only major rare-earth deposits outside of China and with such minerals at his disposal, Soros can control the world’s electronics industries. This past week’s volcanic activity in Iceland could, however, disrupt or destroy Soros’s plans to establish and control a North American-European gateway in Iceland.

The following are some of the emails Young revealed in his exposure of Wikileaks’s CIA connections (as well as to the Russian “phishing” Mafia, an operation run by Russian-Israeli Jews using Israel as a base) [Note: in the second email, "JYA" is a reference to John Young Associates]:

To: John Young
From: Wikileaks
Subject: martha stuart pgp
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:20:25 -0500

—–BEGIN PGP MESSAGE—–

Version: None

J. We are going to fuck them all. Chinese mostly, but not entirely a feint. Invention abounds. Lies, twists and distorts everywhere needed for protection. Hackers monitor Chinese and other intel as they burrow into their targets, when they pull, so do we.

Inxhaustible supply of material. Near 100,000 documents/emails a day. We’re going to crack the world open and let it flower into something new. If fleecing the CIA will assist us, then fleece we will. We have pullbacks from NED, CFR, Freedomhouse and other CIA teats. We have all of pre 2005 afghanistan. Almost all of india fed. Half a dozen foreign ministries. Dozens of political parties and consulates, worldbank, apec, UN sections, trade groups, tibet and fulan dafa associations and… russian phishing mafia who pull data everywhere. We’re drowing. We don’t even know a tenth of what we have or who it belongs to. We stopped storing it at 1Tb.

——————————————-

From: Julian Assange
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:40:14 +0000
To: funtimesahead[a t]lists.riseup.net
Subject: [WL] cryptome disclosure

[This is a restricted internal development mailinglist for w-i-k-i-l-e-a-k-s-.-o-r-g. Please do not mention that word directly in these discussions; refer instead to 'WL'. This list is housed at riseup.net, an activist collective in Seattle with an established lawyer and plenty of backbone.]

No idea what JYA was saying!

It’s clear to me however, that he was not trying to protect people’s identities with his xxxxx’ing, but rather trying to increase the sexiness of the document. Perhaps he feels WL is a threat to the central status mechanism in his life? I think he just likes the controversy.

He may have done us a great favor. There’s a lot of movement in that document. It’s a little anarchist, but I think it generally reads well and sounds like people doing something they care about.

Btw, I suggest we be careful with Wayne Madsen too. He seems to be another case of someone who was fantastic a few years ago, but recently has started to see conspiracies everywhere. Both cases possibly age related.

I am not spending any more thought on it. Next week is going to be busy. The weeks earlier stories will be already done and that’ll set the agenda for the rest of the week, not jya’s attention seeker.

I’m willing to handle calls for .au, although my background may make S a better bet.

————————–

By Wayne Madsen

Source > Pakistan Daily
http://www.effedieffe.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=33278:cia-mossad-and-soros-behind-wikileaks&catid=35:worldwide&Itemid=152

「維基解密」網站在中國被屏蔽更新時間 2010年 12月 1日, 格林尼治標準時間05:38
維基解密網站在中國大陸遭到屏蔽

中國大陸互聯網用戶星期三（12月1日）對BBC中文網證實，近日公開了大批美國外交密函的「維基解密」網站在中國遭到屏蔽。

「維基解密」網站公開的美國外交密函中包括不少可能令中國政府感到難堪的內容。

不過目前還不確定這是否是「維基解密」網站遭到屏蔽的原因。

「維基解密」網站公開的外交文件中提到，韓國外交官稱有中國高官表示願意看到韓國統一朝鮮半島。

還有文件說，中國副外長何亞非對美國副國務卿說朝鮮的行為像個「被寵壞的孩子」。

中國外交部星期二首次對「維基解密」網站事件做出反應。

外交部發言人洪磊說，希望美國妥善處理有關事件，「不希望中美關係（因此）出現波折」。

中國對互聯網的控制一直受到批評，廣受歡迎的社交網站Facebook、Twitter以及視頻互享網站YouTube等都在被屏蔽之列。

部分海外新聞網站也遭到屏蔽，其中就包括BBC中文網。

中國網民將對網民有諸多限制的中國網控稱為「萬里防火牆」（The Great Firewall of China）。 http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/china/2010/12/101201_wikileaks_china_block.shtml

“最大洩密案”疑似中情局導演
作者：夏河年
文章發于：烏有之鄉
更新時間：2010-8-5

　　“維基解密”似乎揭露了不少阿富汗戰争内幕，包括濫殺平民、事後掩飾、未審先殺、巴情報機關暗助塔利班，等等，主要是２００４至２００９年底，駐阿美軍及情報人員撰寫的秘密報告。“維基解密”創辦人阿桑奇希望這批公布的秘密文件能像當年公開的東德秘密警察檔案那樣引起震撼，并提到戰争罪，美國媒體認爲這是美國曆史上最大的軍事情報洩密事件，美國總統國家安全事務助理詹姆斯·瓊斯發表聲明說：“美國政府強烈譴責個人和組織洩露機密信息的做法，這樣做會把美國人和我們合作夥伴的性命置于危險境地，威脅我們的國家安全。”

　　希拉裏在越南說，南海的主權争議牽涉到美國的國家利益，這不是暗示而是明示要介入南海之争，當即遭到中國外長楊潔篪的反駁，中華兒女更是群情激奮，并且出現了在美軍完成部署前的現在立即派兵教訓“越南猴子”的呼聲。在下對此不以爲然，因爲如果現在就對越南動手術，正中希拉裏的下懷，中她老人家的下懷還不如中萊溫斯基的下懷呢，反正不比買彩票中了塊香皂更有意思。真要是幾句話就能挑起一場戰争，希拉裏會比見到女兒切爾西豪華的婚禮場面更開心，而我們則違背了“讓别人生氣而自己不生氣”的原則。啥時候動手術合适？答案是中國經濟的發展面臨巨大困難的時候，到那時，就輪到咱大規模開發南海了，開發商作業，解放軍護駕。我領海範圍内的越南建築統統是沒有經過咱國土局審批的，未來的南海市國土局也不會追認，開發與拆除違章建築同時進行。
　　說到正中下懷，我突然覺得世界媒體正中了美國情報機關的下懷。真正機密的文件，如果有的話，維基解密并沒有披露，而到處張貼的那些“秘密信息”，在我看來，第一談不上有多秘密，因爲在此之前大家就知道不少；其次，“嚴重傷害國家安全”完全是誇大其詞，除非有大料爆出，不信等着瞧，沒啥大不了的；最後，怎麽看怎麽覺得那些“機密信息”的“披露”像是中情局的策劃。我們先看幾條媒體沾沾自喜的“秘密信息”，看看有沒有美國情報機構蓄意而爲的嫌疑。

　　聯軍的攻擊行動共造成１４４宗涉及殺死平民的事件，導緻最少１９５死１７４傷，但這些濫殺錯炸事件大多秘而不宣，掩飾了事。
　　析：前後６年，緻平民１９５死１７４傷，真要是這樣，我說句不好聽的話，那些入侵者即便不是“文明之師”也差不了多少，你這是揭露聯軍醜聞呢還是爲聯軍塗脂抹粉？美軍在阿富汗和伊拉克“甯可錯殺一千也不放走一個”早就不是什麽新聞。

　　秘密行動小組“黑色”特種部隊３７３，未經審訊下，擊殺或生擒目标人物，多達２０００名塔利班高層及基地目标人物，被列入他們的“擒殺名單”，通常是直接擊殺目标而無任何生擒的意圖，共計抓捕殺死塔利班高價值目标的中等和高級指揮官２０５８人。這支部隊亦有誤殺平民、女人和兒童，甚至是擋路的阿富汗警察，事後盟軍通常隻會向被殺平民的家庭作賠償了事。在２００４年到２００９這六年共殺死塔利班５萬８千多人，而從２００１年到２００９年１０月爲止共殺死敵軍１０萬４千人。
　　析：看起來就像是入侵阿富汗的“文明之師”正在阿富汗幹着該幹的事，偶爾會出點小錯，沒啥特别的，并順便恐吓塔利班：爾等都已經在我的刺殺名單上，最好是躲在叢山峻嶺裏别跑出來，不然會小命不保，混入平民中也不管用，我們經常是不加區别的。花３年抓捕，花５年審判，美國電影看多了吧你？有了美軍阿帕奇直升機在伊拉克向平民亂槍掃射墊底，這些算什麽呀！真要是有那麽多塔利班士兵和高價值目标被消滅，塔利班現在還能存在嗎？現狀是塔利班已經卷土重來。美軍入侵阿富汗後，塔利班一直在避開美軍鋒芒，到被推翻時，武裝力量并沒有受到重創，後來則與美軍打起了遊擊戰。當然，加上被消滅的“小恐怖分子”是可能有那麽大數量的。

　　最少有１８０個情報檔案質疑，巴基斯坦情報局爲塔利班提供了資源、避難所甚至是武器，允許其情報機關的代表直接與塔利班秘密會面，商量建立武裝組織網路，打擊駐阿富汗美軍的戰略措施，巴基斯坦政府涉嫌秘密給塔利班提供指導和幫助，例如２００７年４月，巴基斯坦情報人員将１０００架電單車，給了一個和塔利班有關系的網絡，這批批電單車可能用作自殺式炸彈襲擊。
　　析：戰前巴基斯坦和塔利班是非常親密的盟友，巴情報機構和塔利班的親密關系舉世皆知，隻是在美國入侵阿富汗前夕，在美國的威脅下分手。時任總統的小布什對巴基斯坦說：要麽支持我，要麽挨打，不許中立。此後，美國對巴基斯坦是威脅利誘并重。傻子才會相信巴基斯坦和塔利班頭天如膠似漆第二天便打起了生死架，美國有那麽天真嗎？這就好比一對因爲非感情因素而分手的情侶，偶爾還會私下幽會，舉世皆知的關系算什麽機密？今日“解密”，恐怕還是警告巴基斯坦吧？不錯，巴基斯坦是因爲倒戈而得到了一些美元，但巴國從此陷入了無休止的暴力循環中，談不上虧欠美國什麽。

　　塔利班武裝在２００７年用導彈擊落了１架直升機可能導緻１名加拿大軍人死亡。
　　析：這一點被廣泛理解爲揭露美國隐瞞塔利班具有這種武器的信息，實際上我們可以換一個角度理解，那就是：戰争爆發後，加拿大死了１名外交官、２名記者、２名援助人員和１４０多名軍人，而塔利班手裏的導彈６年内總共才打死１名加拿大軍人嘛，根本不必當一回事，小弟們别忙着撤，留下繼續幫幫老大吧。

　　被問及白宮是否會采取措施、迫使維基解密停止公布文件，白宮發言人羅伯特·吉布斯回答說：“我們隻能請求掌握這些秘密文件的人不要繼續對外公布。除此之外,我們無能爲力”。
　　析：這話被廣泛理解爲美國對自由價值的崇尚并被某些人表彰，而實際上，除非你有對抗的手段，否則的話，爲了“美國的國家利益”，啥事他都敢做，包括自由地捏造大規模殺傷性武器的情報以及虐待戰俘、掃射平民。

　　據說是由于洩密者愛國心尚存要求把“傷害減至最小”，“維基解密”網站同意暫時扣起其餘１．５萬份機密文件，總之是迄今爲止世人并沒有看見爆什麽大料。實際上，對于已經公布的文件，維基解密網站都隐去了告密者的真實姓名。維基解密又提供了一些文檔供世人下載，但它是加密文件，能下載不能浏覽。這可以理解爲維基解密的自保手段，意思就是說，如果你美國要迫害我維基解密成員，别怪我向公衆交出密碼，但也可以解釋爲爲了增加可信度而故弄玄虛，畢竟已經公開的充其量隻是一些秘密文件，談不上機密文件，太大的價值是沒有的，爲什麽會這樣呢？因爲大料放在無法打開的另外１．５萬份文件中。爲了将戲演得逼真，２２歲的美軍情報專員曼甯以及與之有來往的麻省理工學院計算機專家被公開列爲情報洩密嫌疑人，曼甯已被從科威特的監獄押解回國。
　　總體感覺，這次的“維基解密”更像是美情報機構導演的一出戲，情報機關通過欺騙“維基解密”而欺騙全世界，因爲有些話讓第三者說出來比自己說出來更顯得可信，比方說，如果五角大樓說從２００４年到２００９年的６年間，總共有１９５名阿富汗平民死于以美國爲首的北約聯軍誤炸，輿論肯定不會相信，比如我就會說“将１９５這三個阿拉伯數字倒過來念還差不多”，讓維基解密以洩密的方式披露，可信度就高多了，畢竟該網站曾經是扔過重磅炸彈的。

　　美國《防務新聞》周刊網站７月２７日報道：美國兩黨共同組成的一個高級國防專家小組稱，五角大樓的支出計劃和節約成本的努力将無法滿足現代戰争的供給需要，而美國很可能需要與包括迅速現代化的中國軍隊在内的未來敵人進行這種現代化戰鬥。《防務新聞》披露這樣的信息，要麽是對中國無所顧忌想說啥說啥，要麽是系列誤導手段之一，比方說引誘中國趁美軍準備不夠充分時與越南開戰，聯系到“最大洩密案”高度疑似美情報機關導演，咱不能聞雞起舞，該幹啥幹啥，如果要打，你打你的我打我的。
　　美國在演戲，咱要多看看，别第一幕沒結束就感動得稀裏嘩啦擦了好幾包餐巾紙。先将中國－東盟自貿區搞紅火，去南沙拔釘子戶可以作爲拉動經濟的手段儲備。中越必有一戰，但不要在美國希望的時候開戰。中美之戰在真僞之間，就看我們的準備是否充分，準備充分，判斷準确，謀劃得當，或可免，或來了也不怕。大國的戰略欺騙和情報機構的戰術欺騙是常有的事，自己要有主心骨。我說的是維基解密疑似美方假“羅甯”之手“洩密”，還有一種可能是俄羅斯情報機構報複抓捕俄方間諜，由于維基解密的消息途徑衆多，美方釋放的假信息和俄方的真信息混到一塊兒，但真正的料，俄方也僅僅是作爲威懾手段加了密，一般不會付諸實施，要知道，梅德韋傑夫的親美意識挺重的。
　　朋友從澳門帶回幾包當地香煙，價格和我們江西老表的“吉品金聖”差不多，二十幾塊錢一包，較貴而不很貴，質量比“吉品金聖”就差多了，煙絲粗細懸殊，口感簡直沒法比，好不容易抽完（朋友送的，我無論如何也不會扔掉），我順嘴說了句“可憐的澳門人民，咋抽這麽差的煙？”，當然是玩笑話，澳門人民比江西老表富裕多了，這我清楚。可見，即便是親自耳聞目睹，還是要加以分析，不然容易出錯。這一波的維基解密，真實性難以核實，蹊跷之處過多，大夥兒還是多看看，多想想，别忙着下結論，我也不敢說美方自導就是最後的結論，提供另一個思路而已。
http://www.wyzxsx.com/Article/view/201012/199355.html

Wayne Madsen: 中國發射見於南加州的導彈

背景：追蹤維基解密機密文件的來源

「維基解密」顧問包括王丹

“維基解密”網站宣布將於今日公開美中情局密件

前巴基斯坦將軍：美國中央情報局、莫薩德在維基解密報告的背後

司馬南：美國利用阿桑奇搞陰謀

Jane Burgermeister：維基解密創始人阿桑格與經濟學人有密切聯繫，由羅富齊銀行家族控制

羅恩保羅企硬支持朱利安阿桑格

維基解密曝光 - 在新世界秩序帷幕背後的男子

外媒曝維基解密資金來源 德國基金會成大股東

你是誰？ 阿桑奇是羅富齊的人？