搜尋此網誌

2011年10月2日星期日

美國宇航局幾乎在近地小行星會議誤失地確認了Nibiru

美國宇航局幾乎在近地小行星會議誤失地確認了Nibiru [9月29日]
NASA Almost Mistakenly Confirms Nibiru At NEOWISE Conference [Sept 29]
Friday, September 30, 2011
Translation by Autumnson Blog

Sept. 29, 2011. NASA held a conference for updating information about the database of near-Earth asteroids in our solar system, tracked by Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) telescope.
2011年9月29日. 美國航空航天局舉行一個會議更新在我們的太陽系中,有關近地小行星的數據庫信息,由廣角紅外線探測望遠鏡(WISE)跟踪的。
But things got really interesting when a phone caller asked NASA to deny the danger of Planet X (a.k.a. Nibiru).
但事情變得真的有趣,當手機來電者要求NASA否認 行星X(即Nibiru)的危險。

NASA almost mistakenly confirms NIBIRU, at NEOWISE conference [Sept 29]
美國宇航局幾乎在近地小行星會議誤失地確認了Nibiru[Sept 29]
2011-09-30

(Minute 4:12) Phone Caller: "Can you (...) reassure people that Planet X isn't coming to get them next year?"
(4:12分鐘)致電者:“你能否(...)向人們再保證,行星X不會在來年擊中他們呢?”


Not only that Amy Mainzer (NEOWISE Principal Investigator, JPL) did NOT deny its existence, but she almost confirmed it, after tangling in explanations:
不僅是艾米邁因策爾(噴氣推進實驗室NEOWISE首席研究員)沒有否認它的存在,在解釋中纏繞一會後,而且她幾乎確認了它,:
"Planet X is not coming to get us!" she said, basically acknowledging its existence.
“行星X不會是來殺死我們!”她說,基本上承認了它的存在。
After dodging the question for some time, she eventually continued: "We think that this (Planet X?) is just ... huh ... just a sort of" then she understands the mistake and tries to fix it by adding: "If there's something out there" and continued "COULD BE A LARGE BODY IN A ROUGHLY CIRCULAR ORBIT!" WHAT???
迴避了問題一段時間後,她最終繼續說:“我們認為這(行星X?)只是...嗯...只是有幾分”,然後她理解了有錯誤並試圖修復它,補充說:“如果那外面有什麼“並繼續”可能是在近似圓形軌道中的一個大個體!“什麼???
During the 70s and 80s, it was common for NASA to mention the existence of a so called 'Planet X' and they have been openly discussing the gravitational anomalies caused by it. It was called 'Planet X' because it was hidden to their telescopes (brown dwarfs are only visible in infrared spectrum), but they mathematically knew it was somewhere close. According to them, Planet X is the sister star of our Sun, but it has an elliptical orbit around it.
(See my articles in the Nibiru section for more details about the scientific correlations).

Without the mumbling and the 'fix' she basically says:
沒有了喃喃自語和那些“修復”,她基本上是說:
"Planet X is not coming to get us! ... We think that this is just a sort of ... a large body in a roughly circular orbit!"
“行星X不是來殺死我們!... 我們認為這只是有幾分...在近似圓形軌道中的一個大個體
!”
But the phone caller pushes things even more, asking if there's: "...anything else you wanted to say on that point?"
但來電者將事情更迫進一步,查問是否:“...在那一點上你有任何話想說呢?”
Amy Mainzer falls for the trap once again & begins speaking about brown dwarfs:
艾米邁因策爾再次落入陷阱,及開始說及有關棕矮星:
"We were able to confirm the discovery of 100 new ... huh ... objects that are these very cool stars called brown dwarfs and ... so ... that's very similar to what ... huh ... people are interested in looking for, so ... we've actually found some of these are relatively close to the Earth."
“我們能夠證實發現了100顆新的...嗯...物體,它們是這些非常寒色的棕矮星和...那麽...是非常類似什麼...嗯...人們有興趣在尋找的,因此...我們已實際發現了這其中的一些是雙對地接近地球。“
And this takes the acronym 'Never A Straight Answer' (NASA) to a whole new level.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiLI1mp2DxA&feature=player_embedded

NASA近地小行星會議令我心寒!!! 他們看來像在隱瞞一些事情!

關於Nibiru 的真相: NASA高級科學家:沒有Nibiru 亦沒有威脅

NASA人員關於2012年真相:太陽風暴

沒有留言: