光明會錫安長老會聖羅馬帝國和NWO 及森遜密碼驗證

The Illuminati, Learned Elders of Zion, Holy Roman Empire & the NWO plus The Simpsons Code. 禍哉、那些以虛假之細繩牽罪孽的人、他們又像以套繩拉罪惡。說、任他急速行、趕快成就他的作為、使我們看看．任以色列聖者所謀劃的臨近成就、使我們知道。〔賽 5 18－19〕禍哉、那些向耶和華深藏謀略的、又在暗中行事、說、誰看見我們呢．誰知道我們呢。〔賽 29 15〕禍哉、這悖逆的兒女 ...要靠法老的力量 ...〔賽 30 1－2〕禍哉、那些下埃及求幫助的...那作惡之家...〔賽 31 1－2〕那撒但一會的、自稱是猶太人、其實不是猶太人、乃是說謊話的 ...〔啟 3 9〕

2012年1月5日星期四

GPS衛星定位監測無需手令：法官裁决

GPS衛星定位監測無需手令：法官裁决
No Warrant Needed for GPS Monitoring, Judge Rules
By David Kravets
January 3, 2012
Translation by Autumnson Blog

A Missouri federal judge ruled the FBI did not need a warrant to secretly attach a GPS monitoring device to a suspect’s car to track his public movements for two months.
一位密蘇里州聯邦法官裁定，聯邦調查局並不需要手令來秘密地黏附一部GPS監控設備，到一名犯罪嫌疑人的車輛以追踪他的公眾行動兩個月。
The ruling, upholding federal theft and other charges, is one in a string of decisions nationwide supporting warrantless GPS surveillance. Last week’s decision comes as the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the issue within months in an unrelated case.
該裁決，維護了聯邦盜竊和其它指控，是一串全國性的決定之一來支持無手令的GPS監測。上週的決定出現，正當最高法院在一宗無關的案件被預計數月內在這個議題上裁定。
The ruling from Magistrate David Noce mirrored the Obama administration position before the Supreme Court during oral arguments on the topic in November. In short, defendant Fred Robinson, who was suspected of fudging his time sheets for his treasurer’s office job for the city of St. Louis, had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his public movements, Magistrate Noce said.

Noce ruled: (.pdf)
Noce裁决: (.pdf)

Here, installation of the GPS tracker device onto defendant Robinson’s Cavalier was not a ’search’ because defendant Robinson did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the exterior of his Cavalier. Agents installed the GPS tracker device onto defendant’s Cavalier based on a reasonable suspicion that he was being illegally paid as a ‘ghost’ employee on the payroll of the St. Louis City Treasurer’s Office.

Installation of the GPS tracker device was non-invasive; a magnetic component of the GPS tracker device allowed it to be affixed to the exterior of the Cavalier without the use of screws and without causing any damage to the exterior of the Cavalier. The GPS tracker device was installed when the Cavalier was on a public street near defendant’s residence. Installation of the GPS tracker device revealed no information to the agents other than the public location of the vehicle. Under these circumstances, installation of the GPS tracker device was not a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.

The GPS tracking in 2010, Noce continued, “corroborated that Robinson’s employment time sheets were false.”

Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben told the Supreme Court in November oral arguments that federal authorities employ warrantless GPS monitoring “in the low thousands annually.” Dreeben also said the government could affix GPS devices, without warrants, to the vehicles of the nine members of the Supreme Court.

Many of the justices were skeptical of the government’s position, saying the United States could evolve into a surveillance state if the Supreme Court sides with the government.

Justice Stephen Breyer told Dreeben, “If you win this case, there is nothing to prevent the police or government from monitoring 24 hours a day every citizen of the United States.”

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/warrantless-gps-monitoring/