Shuttle Program Discontinued For A Hidden Reason?
By Ted Tweitmeyer
9-2-11
Translation by Autumnson Blog
For many years while the shuttles have been flying, NASA has been working on an advanced engine for a new space plane which will have sufficient velocity to achieve orbit. A number of difficulties were encountered during development of the new engine technology and the exact status of it is currently unknown. No known successful test launch into orbit of a space plane from runway on the ground has taken place at NASA. Yet the agency discontinued the shuttle program without a viable replacement, instead counting on the struggling Russian space agency and a 3 person Apollo-style capsule for ferrying astronauts to/from the space station. Does this make sense?
在航天飛機飛行的多年，美國宇航局一直致力於做出先進的發動機，給一艘新的空天飛機將有足夠的速度到達軌道。發展新引擎技術的過程中遇到多項困難，和它的正確狀態目前尚不得而知。沒有已知的成功測試，發生在美國宇航局由發射一架太空飛機從跑道地面進入軌道。然而，機構停止航天飛機項目而沒有一個可行的替代品，代之指望奮鬥中的俄羅斯宇航局和一個 3人的阿波羅式的太空艙，給運送宇航員到/從空間站，這是否常理？
To many people, the loss of the shuttle program brings to mind the private space program which has already achieved orbit. It would make you wonder if it could replace the shuttle. Consider that if the space station was now under construction, this tiny passenger-oriented space plane could not lift the massive sections of the space station up to the requisite 200 mile high orbit. The private space plane would need to be incredibly huge to accomplish such a task.
Lifting a few passengers up to very low Earth orbit (essentially sub-orbital for all practical purposes) whose orbit soon decays is one thing. Lifting massive, multi-ton ton space station modules and satellites up to a real Earth orbital altitude where they will stay there by themselves with little help for years is quite a different story. Satellites are several stories tall and utilize a single stage engine to lift them to approximately a 22,500 mile high orbit.
Perhaps to find out why our manned space program is essentially and possibly intentionally crippled we need to look at a few developments:
也許找出為什麼我們的載人航天計劃本質上和可能地是故意癱瘓的，我們需要看看幾項發展：
1. Advanced space vehicle technology is already in use by government agencies which employs a form of gravity propulsion. Thousands of eyewitnesses have seen these huge vehicles, often appearing as flying triangles and possibly other shapes. Many triangles fly so slowly and close to the ground they block out most of the sky. Sometimes these are low enough that seams and features on the hull's surface have been sighted. This technology clearly makes the space shuttle program useless, as it has been for more than 20 years since these vehicles first went airborne. Further, this technology can do everything the shuttle does and much more but with much less fanfare, no pollution and almost no noise.
1。先進的航天器技術已由政府機構使用，採用重力推進的一種形式。數以千計的目擊者已看到這些巨大的交通工具，經常出現以飛行三角形和可能是其它形狀。許多三角形飛得那麼慢及靠近地面，他們遮蔽掉大部分的天空。有時這些是足夠低，因此船體表面上的接縫和特徵已被目擊。這項技術清楚地令航天飛機計劃無用，因為自這些工具第一次升空，它已經存在超過 20年。此外，這項技術可做一切穿梭機所做的和更多，但以少得多、沒污染、幾乎沒噪音的做法。
2. One description of the early black triangle propulsion system almost thirty years ago was described as a ring 60 feet in diameter filled with high pressure, rotating mercury vapor to reduce the weight of the vehicle by 89%. A thruster in each corner of the vehicle would counter the remaining weight. Since that time we can be certain many more advances have been made.
2。對早期黑色三角形推進系統的一個描述幾乎是在三十年前，被描述為60英尺直徑充滿高壓的一個環，旋轉水銀蒸氣以減少交通工具的重量89％；在每個角落的一個推進器會對銷其餘的重量。從那時起，我們可以肯定有更多的已取得進展。
I spent many hours plowing through NASA's image servers and was able to find a photo of a toroid ring. This object looks far too large to be a tire tube for a truck:
我花很多時間爬過美國宇航局的圖像伺服器，及能找到一幀環形圈的照片。這物體看上去遠大於是一輛卡車的內胎：
在此圖像中女性們的髮型表明這照片是攝於50年前。 （注意1:00位置的女性髮型。）這些人似乎在檢查環是否有任何缺陷，因為沒有在這裡見到工具。如果站在近左側的男人高度是約5英尺高，這環形似乎是約 7英尺厚。
2. Were we told in the past to stay out of space by ET or their agents? There was a long-forgotten NASA press conference held near the end of March 1998. In this conference it was stated there would be no more manned space missions and no reason was given. Then the very next day another press conference was held where it was stated that manned missions will continue. Again, no answer or reason was given for the second statement. Why?
3. On June 11, 2011 NASA sent out a short video message to its employees about being prepared. Did they know about hurricane Irene TWO MONTHS before it would occur? The spokesman in the video (which was posted on the NASA website) flatly stated NASA is also responsible for "people on other worlds." What other worlds? What more do they know but refuse to make public? Apparently quite a lot. For them to know about Irene ahead of time is fascinating in itself.
4. The History Channel has devoted hundreds of hours to shows which they produced themselves that talk about UFOs, abductions and evidence that aliens have interacted with humans throughout history. When this same network first aired shows about aliens and UFOs years ago, they were almost always filled with cynicism, ridicule and negative comments about these very topics. Abducted people were often treated terribly on their older shows. These shows were also narrated by the same unmistakable voice which narrated the PBS Nova series for decades. Now these shows are no longer aired and have been replaced with pro-alien shows.
5. Werner VonBraun, the late former Nazi scientist and his team are the real founders of the US space program which pre-dates NASA. VonBraun was asked many years ago how could he possibly develop such advanced technology back in the early 1900s. He pointed upward, quietly saying "We had help." According to his secretary Bonnie Holmes, back in the seventies VonBraun stated that long range plans in place for America include wars, terrorism and will lastly be followed by the announcement of an alien threat. His secretary has already gone public with this information herself.
6. While perhaps not related, more and more alien-threat type movies are hitting theaters. The last time we saw this type of activity was back 60 years ago, such as the first version of the film "The Day The Earth Stood Still" which boldly portrayed a single alien and his robot telling all of mankind what they must do. Today's films are far more violent, and often portray humans as unable to fight back and hanging onto life by a thread.. Films like "Battle of LA" and "Skyline." There is at least one post-alien attack television series about this scenario, too.
7. Flyovers of massive black triangles, such as the one which flew over the Hudson river valley years ago have been seen by thousands of people. These sightings and encounters very well may be staged events (if humans fly all of them.) These sightings could also be used as evidence to "prove" aliens are already here.
Connecting all these dots leads us to at least one possible conclusion We are on the verge of hearing an announcement from the government that advanced space technology already exists. That should really hammer the already skittish and rumor-driven stock markets into the ground and the world economy along with it. We'll also certainly be told as well that the shuttle program is no longer necessary. Perhaps the idea of an outside alien threat (as stated by president Ronald Reagan) will also be used to start up the fear-factor in the population all over again, just as 9/11 did ten years ago.
連接所有這些點使我們至少得到一個可能的結論，我們都在聽到從政府宣布先進空間技術已經存在的邊緣。那真的應該重錘已經易受驚嚇和謠言驅動的股市進入地面，和世界經濟伴隨它一起。我們亦將一定會被告知航天飛機項目不再需要了。也許外來外星人威脅的想法（正如列根總統指出）亦將再用於去啟動各地人口的恐懼因素，就像十年前9/11所做的。
Announcement of "new" superior spacecraft technology developed or used by the government (which thousands of people have already seen outdoors) will first require the cooperation of the secret space program which operates vehicles propelled by advanced gravity drive technology. Some children don't like to share toys in their sandbox. But an announcement of an "outside alien threat" could be the catalyst to make that happen. When you have worked with the government you soon understand it has taken on a life of it's own and is far bigger than any one man, or group of men. But suppose the agency which operates these vehicles decides not to cooperate in the disclosure process? One possible alternative is to claim these human-built vehicles are of alien origin. After all, who outside of government can prove they are not?
It has been said that time reveals all things, and indeed it will.
Ted Twietmeyer
tedtw@frontiernet.net
http://www.rense.com/general94/shut.htm
美國宇航局揭開太空發射系統遠景
沒有留言:
發佈留言