氣候科學家：操縱地球的氣候不會花費納稅人超過 10億美元...每年！

氣候科學家：操縱地球的氣候不會花費納稅人超過 10億美元...每年！
Climate Scientist: Manipulating Earth’s Climate Will Not Cost Taxpayer More than $1 Billion… Annually!
Jurriaan Maessen
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, September 7, 2010

David Keith, director of the Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy, has proposed releasing engineered nano-sized discs in the earth’s atmosphere to “offset global warming”- and that for just $ 1 billion of your taxpayer-money annually.
可持續能源、環境與經濟中心的董事大衛基斯，己建議放出設計成納米大小的光盤在地球的大氣層，以“抵消全球變暖” - 和那僅是每年你的納稅人金錢 10億美元。
“You could manipulate the Earth’s climate at large scale for a cost that’s of the order of $1 billion a year. It sounds like a lot of money, but compared to the costs of managing other environmental problems or climate change, that is peanuts.”, Keith told Nanowerk News.
“你可以大比例操縱地球的氣候，而訂單的成本 是10億美元一年。它聽起來好像很多錢，但相對於其它環境問題或氣候變化的管理成本，那是花生般。“基斯告訴 Nanowerk新聞。

Keith also made clear that mentioning the annual cost is not necessarily an argument pro or con, but an “indication” rather, “that risk, not cost, will be the deciding issue.”
基思還明確指出，提到每年的費用不是一個必然贊成或反對的論點，然而是一個“指標”，“即那種風險，不是成本，將是決定性的議題。”
Until now, scientists have mainly looked at injecting the volcano-mimicking sulphur dioxide into the upper atmosphere as a way to “get the maximum cooling benefit.” This new nano-particle proposal of spraying “levitating” engineered nano-particles in the atmosphere might have serious drawbacks, Keith acknowledges:
直到現在，科學家們已主要研究在上大氣層層注入模仿火山的二氧化硫，以此為一種方法來“獲得最大的冷卻益處。”這種新的納米粒子噴灑“磁懸浮”設計納米粒子在大氣中的建議，基斯承認可能有嚴重缺點：

“A downside of both these new ideas is they would do something that nature has never seen before. It’s easier to think of new ideas than to understand their effectiveness and environmental risks.”
“這兩種新想法的負面是，它們會做一些東西大自然從未見過。它是比較容易去想新主意，多於了解它們的有效性和環境風險。“
On the upside, Keith says:

“(…) the distribution of engineered nano-particles above the Earth could be more controlled and less likely to harm the planet’s protective ozone layer.”

The risks that Keith is willing to take with the earth is illustrated by a speech he gave for TED (Technology, Entertainment, and Design). Other speakers for TED have included Al Gore, Hans Rosling and Sir Ken Robinson:

David Keith: A surprising idea for "solving" climate change
大衛凱斯：一個驚奇的想法以“解決”氣候變化
西元2007年11月15日


“We could make the particles migrate to over the poles (…) which would have minimal bad impacts in the mid part of the planet, where we live, and do the maximum job of what we might need to do which is cooling the poles in case of planetary emergency, if you like.”

“The one thing about this”, Keith states, “is that it gives us extraordinary leverage, this.. this improved science and engineering will- whether we like it or not- give us more and more leverage to affect the planet, to control the planet, to give us weather and climate control- not because we plan it, not because we want it, just because science delivers it to us bit by bit. With better knowledge of the way the system works and better engineering tools to affect it.”

Control of the planet, no less, and at a minimal expense for the taxpayer- if you call $ 1 billion a year minimal.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/climate-scientist-manipulating-earths-climate-will-not-cost-taxpayer-more-than-1-billion-annually.html

瘋狂科學家要模擬火山爆發以遮擋太陽

一種邪惡的氣氛在圍繞地球工程形成