搜尋此網誌

2018年12月11日星期二

特朗普-而不是希拉莉- 會被拘捕? 彈劾?左派反檯,他可能下獄

特朗普-而不是希拉莉- 會被拘捕? 彈劾?左派反檯,他可能下獄
Trump to be Arrested? Impeached? Left Flips the Tables- Instead of Hillary, He may be Jailed
https://youtu.be/kJZXOV5F3h0


起訴、彈劾和監禁我們總統的熱談,換句話說即是“一場政變”
Talk of Indicting, Impeaching and Jailing our President. In other words "a Coup"

It would be very easy to succumb to dire feelings with all the filth spewing forth from the media about President Trump.

Just today, Congressman Adam Schiff of California said on TV he believes President Trump committed two campaign law felonies and wants him imprisoned.

Also today, incoming House Judiciary Chairman Gerald Nadler said he believes Trumps actions - BEFORE BECOMING PRESIDENT - amount to Impeachable conduct because, in Nadler's words, Trump allegedly "Defrauded his way into office" by paying off two bimbo-sluts to keep quiet about his extra-marital affairs.

Notice how neither one of these feckless political cunts mentioned "Russia Collusion?"  They knew it the whole "Russia Collusion" nonsense was false.  Nevertheless, they ran with it until everyone except the complete morons from Hollywood (and the retards from Twitter and Facebook who follow them)  saw through the lies . . .so now they move onto another phony claim: Campaign Finance Law violations.

Both Congressmen are full of shit and they know it.  But both men are such degenerate liars, such sociopaths, they're incapable of acknowledging the single over-riding fact that destroys all their theories:

Donald Trump could not have committed campaign finance law violations by paying off the two whores, because the money he used to pay them off did NOT come from campaign funds. Period.

According to the Federal Election Commission, there is no crime if funds were not campaign funds.


Filth-Ridden DOJ & Courts
Now, the unimaginable douchebags in the US Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) - and elsewhere in the filth-ridden cesspool of the US Department of Justice - seem to think that they can twist and manipulate reality by having Trump's former lawyer, a mental weakling named Cohen, admit he paid off the whores "with the intent to influence a federal election."

Their attempt at manipulation is well grounded in the hideous reality that THE LAW DOES NOT MEAN WHAT IT ACTUALLY SAYS; the law means what a Judge decides it means.

I know.  The US Justice Department pulled similar shit with me back in 2009 -10.

And they won!  Thanks to Judicial shitbag United States District Court Judge Donald E. Walter from the western District of Louisiana.

Judge Walter decided to become a single-person Legislature and, in his ruling DENYING my motion to Dismiss, he held "free speech has to be more than just rants . . . a line must be drawn for the good of the order" and went on to allow me - a media member - to be put on criminal trial over an Editorial.

It didn't matter to "judge" Walter that Judges don't draw lines, Legislatures do.  It didn't matter that no "serious expression of intent to commit an act of violence" was uttered by me, as the US Supreme Court requires in "threat" prosecutions (See Virginina V. Black, 1992)

He, like so many of the other two-legged bags of human garbage on the federal bench, was apparently drunk with power and he was going to show the world that little people like me cannot express certain opinions about federal judges.

He then proceeded to RIG the final two of my incredible 3 full federal criminal trials, until my defense was so gutted, and the written law so twisted,  I lost.

Rigged as follows:

Trial #2
a) Judge Walter ruled that the Government can give it's opening statement, but we in the Defense CANNOT GIVE OUR OPENING STATEMENT until after the government rests its case, AND;

b) The Defense cannot question government (FBI) witnesses about my role with the FBI, AND;

c) I cannot raise a defense as having worked with those FBI witnesses and was PAID to say the same words four years earlier, which were NOT a crime according to FBI in-house counsel,  unless I personally took the Witness stand and testified that I worked for FBI.

Trial #3:
A, B, & C above still apply . . .  AND;

The government CAN mention my work for the FBI in their opening statement and with their witnesses, but I STILL cannot question their Witnesses about it even though the government mentioned it in their opening statement,  or raise my FBI defense, unless I take the witness stand.

How's THAT for a "fair trial?"  (Yes, it actually happened - transcripts in Brooklyn federal court)

After two hung Juries and a remarkable THIRD trial, I went right on to prison for 33 months; for writing an OPINION. . .  In country that prides itself on "freedom of speech" and "freedom of the press."

There's our Constitution.

There's our "rights."

Out the fucking window.  Because a good for nothing, rat, bastard, son-of-a-bitch federal judge, Donald E. Walter,  threw the law out the window.


http://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/opinion-editorial/hal-turner-commentary/3560-talk-of-indicting-impeaching-and-jailing-our-president-in-other-words-a-coup

沒有留言: