如何創建ㄧ個社會主義國度
在你能夠創建ㄧ個社會主義國度之前,必須先取得8個層次的控制, 第ㄧ個層次尤其重要。
1. 健康保健: 控制了健康保健則你控制了人民。
2. 貧窮: 增加貧窮的水平有咁高得咁高,窮人容易控制,兼且如果你提供每ㄧ樣他們活命的東西,他們將不會反撃。
3. 債務: 增加債務至不能持續的水平,這個方向你就能夠增加税項,而這將會產生更多貧窮。
4. 槍械管制: 移除人民自己防衞政府的能力,這方向你就能夠創建ㄧ個警權國度。
5. 福利: 控制人民生活的每一個層面(食物,房屋和入息)。
6. 教育: 控制人民閲讀和聽到的東西,控制兒童在學校學到的東西,想ㄧ想教學標準'共同核心'。
7. 宗教: 從政府和學校移除對上帝的信仰。
8. 階級戰爭: 將人民分開富裕和貧窮,這將會造成更多的不滿,並且在窮人的支持下更容易向富裕的人徵税。
Credit: Shane Calkins
阿林斯基12條反叛規則
2013年4月9日
這是來自阿林斯基的完整列表。
規則1:："不僅是你擁有的力量，但敵人以為你有什麼。"權力是派生的2–資金和人員主要來源。 "不"必須建立血肉的能力。 (這些都是供應充足的兩件事。 政府和企業一直很難吸引人，而且通常這樣做幾乎完全與經濟學論據。)
規則2:："永遠不要去外面專門知識的人。 "這會導致混亂，恐懼和退縮。感覺安全添加任何人的骨幹。 (組織在攻擊之下想知道為什麼激進分子不處理"真正"的問題。這是為什麼。 他們避免他們不知道的事情。 )
規則3:："只要有可能，去外面敵人的專門知識。"尋找方法增加的不安全感、焦慮和不確定。 (這個時間都會發生。 在攻擊之下看有多少機構是思想僵化的看似不相關的參數，然後強迫他們解決。)
規則4:："讓敵人不辜負其自己的規則書。 "如果規則是，每封信得到回复，發送3萬封信。你可以用這個殺了他們因為沒有人能夠遵守所有的規則。 (這是一個嚴肅的規則。烽煙四起的實體是非常公信力和信譽處於危險之中，因為如果激進分子抓住它撒謊或不履行其承諾，他們可以繼續蠶食破壞。)
規則5:："嘲笑是人的最有力的武器。 "沒有防禦。這是非理性的。這是氣憤。它還是點的重要壓力，迫使敵人讓步。 (很粗，粗魯和意思，對吧？他們想創造憤怒和恐懼。 )
規則6:："一個好的策略是喜歡你的人之一。 "沒有敦促他們會繼續做下去，然後回來做更多。他們在做他們的事，甚至會建議更好。 (激進分子，在這個意義上，是其他人沒什麼不同。我們都避免"聯合國的快樂"活動，但是在我們享受和欣賞那些工作，並把結果。 )
規則7:："拖延太久的戰術成為拖動。 "別成了舊聞。 (甚至激進分子感到厭倦。所以讓他們興奮和參與，主辦單位不斷提出新的策略。 )
規則8:："保持壓力。放過。 "一直嘗試新的東西來保持反對的平衡。作為反對黨的主人一個方法，從側面撞了他們新的東西。 (攻擊，攻擊，攻擊來自四面八方，不會給組織一個休息的機會，重組，恢復和思路。)
規則9:："威脅通常是比事情本身更可怕。 "想像力和自尊心能想出比任何維權更多的後果。 (感知就是現實。 大型組織總是準備最壞的，這可能是最遠的積極分子的思想。結果是這個組織將花費巨大的時間和精力，創建自己的集體思想極端的結論。可以輕鬆地毒害思想和結果在道德失範的可能性。 )
規則10:："如果你用力推負面，它將推動並成為積極的。 "從另一邊的暴力能贏得市民因為公眾同情弱者，你的身邊。 (工會使用這種策略。 和平[聲音]示威期間mid-20th世紀初的全盛時期，工會管理的憤怒，經常以暴力的形式，最終使公眾的同情他們一邊。)
規則11:："成功的攻擊是具有建設性的替代價格。 "不要讓敵人得分點不解決問題因為你被抓住。 (老話說：如果你不解決方案的一部分，你是問題的一部分。 維權組織有一個議程，他們的策略是把一個位置提供一個論壇來行使權力。所以，他們有一個折衷方案。 )
規則12:：選擇目標，定格、個性化和分化。 "切斷了支持網絡隔離目標從同情。在人之後，並沒有機構去；人的速度比機構的傷害。(這是殘酷的，但非常有效。 直接的、個性化的批評和嘲笑工程。
Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals
Here is the complete list from Alinsky.
* RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
http://non-violentes.blogspot.com/2013/04/12_9.html?m=1
沒有留言:
發佈留言