搜尋此網誌

2019年6月12日星期三

圓/扁地球對簿公堂: 美國法庭裁決地平説勝出

圓/扁地球對簿公堂: 美國法庭裁決地平説勝出

USA COURT RULES IN FLAT EARTH FAVOUR‼️‼️👊🏻👊🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

I’m pleased to announce that on this Shavuot/Pentecost, the 9th of Sivan, that the judge presiding over a civil court case in which I was being sued for the amount of $15,000,ruled in my favor and sided with the evidence I presented. 

Interestingly enough this case was actually based upon whether one believes the earth to be a globe or flat plane.   The judge was ruling whether the plaintiff William Thompson had provided ample evidence to warrant being rewarded the prize money I had put up to anyone that could confirm in two separate scientific experiments that the earth was round and contained measurable curvature. My contention was that it did not and that I could prove through science that such was not the case. Her ruling was that he did not confirm through real-world experimentation that curvature exist and whether one believes the earth to be flat or a globe, one must consider the evidence which I brought forth to the court in opposition to the supposed existence of the Earth’s curvature.

Imagine the shock of those law students sitting in during the proceedings to watch the case argued out, when they discovered that those in the courtroom would be contesting arguments for and against viewpoint that the earth could hold shape contrary to what we have been as public largely indoctrinated into belief. I was so relieved to discover that the judge was actually open to hearing and considering the facts of this case; and in doing so state in conclusion that no matter one’s belief on whether the earth was a globe or flat, certainly there is much to consider when examining the evidence.

With that I will submit below the statement that I read into the Barrow County Magistrate Court public record, here in Winder Georgia this morning at 9 AM Eastern. Know that I have amended some of this material to clarify the stances on this case. However, the facts as presented here are truthful and reflect the proceedings brought against me by William Thompson. I am hoping to get an account of the case as reported by the law clerk but do not yet know how to do so.

I’m not sure whether this case is the first one to be argued publicly in a court of law with focus and regard to the question of whether the earth is a plane or a globe. It would interest me to know whether any other case like this had been argued before a judge.  William did bring up to the court that should he lose this case it would reflect very badly on the indoctrinated belief that the earth is a globe. I do believe that the judge’s decision to support the evidence that I’ve presented on such consideration, was without a doubt a large win for our community and a precedent we can in the least be proud of, in sharing discussion on this topic and case.

All praise, honor, and glory to the Most High God. This case was a win for Yahaveh and biblical cosmologists. Praise God that I did not have to shell out $15,000 dollars to someone undeserving of such reward. Likewise God bless Judge Jamie Crowe for standing with truth in the face of world conditioning.

Record – Court Case: Plaintiff William Thompson vs Defendant Zen Garcia

Plaintiff: Suing the defendant for $15,000, believing that he had honored the rules of a contest put forth by Zen Garcia as to whether the earth possessed a measure of curvature defined by the formula of eight inches per mile inversely squared according to the distance of such calculation. Thompson believed that he had satisfied the rules of the contest set forth by Garcia, and deserves just compensation.

Thompson claims that he had developed two software programs which between them allowed the Earth’s curvature to be measured. In one instance  the software allowed for the measurement of curvature between the towers spanning an elongated bridge. The other, to calculate the amount of curvature existing between witnesses on the ground and others at the top of buildings when watching sunsets.

Defendant: Garcia shared numerous real-world examples which dispelling the existence of measurable curvature should the earth be a globe of 25,000 miles circumference, stated that given the evidence, one must reconsider whether the earth is truly spherical in shape or like a plane flat and level as the evidence suggests.

To whom it may concern:

At the end of 2014, a cohost and colleague of mine known by the broadcasting handle the Hijacker, began imploring me to examine a topic which for some reason began garnering a lot of interest on the Internet. The issue had to do with whether scientists were correct or not in their calculation of the Earth’s measurable curvature. Many of my listeners likewise continued in suggestion that I examine this topic with open mind. Having studied astronomy for three years as my requisite college science, and familiar with the dynamics, construct of the solar system, I felt I would be able to settle this question quickly and then return to my normal programming.

Looking for informative answer as to the earth’s rate of curvature, Google led me to the Bedford Level experiment. Conducted in 1838 by Samuel Birley Rowbotham, a mathematician and scientist, he was able to use the Pythagorean theorem to determine a formula by which one could then measure the Earth’s curvature:

His calculation can be affirmed by the Pythagorean Theorem which dictates that the sum of the square of adjacent and opposite sides equals the square of the hypotenuse in a right triangle. a² + b² = c².

Attempting to calculate the distance that the Earth drops down per mile, the equation would be radius² + distance² = (radius + drop)². The measure or rate of drop or curvature, can be written in equation as √(r² + d²) - r = drop. Should the radius of the earth be 3,963 miles, at one mile distance, the equation can be solved as √(3963² + 1²) - 3963 = drop. Putting that into a calculator you get drop = .000126 mi. There are 5280 feet in a mile and 12 inches in a foot. So .000126 * 5280 * 12 = the rate of curvature should correspond to 7.98336 inches as calculated by Rowbotham.

How to Calculate Earth's Curvature

https://flatvsround.blogspot.com/2015/10/how-to-calculate-earths-curvature.html?m=1


In 1849, Rowbotham published Zetetic Astronomy under the pseudonym Parallax, where he reported this formula as equation for how to determine the rate of the curvature of the earth:

IF the earth is a globe, and is 25,000 English statute miles in circumference, the surface of all standing water must have a certain degree of convexity—every part must be an arc of a circle. From the summit of any such arc there will exist a curvature or declination of 8 inches in the first statute mile. In the second mile the fall will be 32 inches; in the third mile, 72 inches, or 6 feet, as shown in the following diagram:

...After the first few miles the curvature would be so great that no difficulty could exist in detecting either its actual existence or its proportion...In the county of Cambridge there is an artificial river or canal, called the "Old Bedford." It is upwards of twenty miles in length, and ... passes in a straight line through that part of the Fens called the "Bedford Level." The water is nearly stationary—often completely so, and throughout its entire length has no interruption from locks or water-gates of any kind; so that it is, in every respect, well adapted for ascertaining whether any or what amount of convexity really exists.

Based upon the Pythagorean theorem and simplified mathematics, he cited the following formula for use in determining said curvature: (miles squared) or 8in. (distance in miles^2). Meaning that over a certain distance, one must simply square the root of the distance traveled in miles and then multiply that figure by eight inches. For example, traveling one mile, one would multiply 8 x 1 and then square that number:


8(1×1) = 8 Inches of total curvature

determining curvature over the first ten miles in inches, the rate would amount to:

8(1×1) = 8 Inches of total curvature
8(2×2) = 32 Inches of total curvature
8(3×3) = 72 Inches of total curvature
8(4×4) = 128 Inches of total curvature
8(5×5) = 200 Inches of total curvature
8(6×6) = 288 Inches of total curvature
8(7×7) = 392 Inches of total curvature
8(8×8) = 512 Inches of total curvature
8(9×9) = 648 Inches of total curvature
8(10×10) = 800 Inches of total curvature

etc…

Converting the total number of inches of curvature into feet, simply divide that number by twelve, since there are twelve inches per feet, or twelve inches in one foot. The table below shows how much measurable curvature should exist in scale of miles according to the distances listed prior.

8(1×1)/12 = 0.666 Feet of total curvature
8(2×2)/12 = 2.666 Feet of total curvature
8(3×3)/12 = 6 Feet of total curvature
8(4×4)/12 = 10.666 Feet of total curvature
8(5×5)/12 = 16.666 Feet of total curvature
8(6×6)/12 = 24 Feet of total curvature
8(7×7)/12 = 32.666 Feet of total curvature
8(8×8)/12 = 42.666 Feet of total curvature
8(9×9)/12 = 54 Feet of total curvature
8(10×10)/12 = 66.666 Feet of total curvature

Thus, if the earth is 25,000 miles in circumference then the curvature would be 8 inches per mile squared. To use his formula for calculation, just square the mileage and multiply by 8. So if you use 3 miles it is 3 squared (9) and multiply by 8 (72), which is 6 feet. Therefore the Earth’s curvature at 3 miles should be a rate of 6 feet or 72 inches. 

To test this hypothesis, Rowbotham conducted what is now the famous Bedford Level experiment. Tying a flag to the mast of the boat sent 6 miles across the still canal waters, he determined with the use of a telescope that there was no change in height.  Given the accepted circumference of the Earth’s sphericity, the top of the mast should have been some 11 feet (3.4 m) below his line of sight.

Considering that measurable curvature was nonexistent, Rowbotham like myself and many of my colleagues now had been forced to consider whether there was any truth to the existence of curvature? Of fact which can be verified in conducting a simple experiment with the use of a laser pointer and mirror. Doing this simple test many were led to the realization that the earth had no rotundity to its form.

This fact as bizarre as it is, is one that anyone, anywhere can visually affirm for themselves in simple experimentation.  Considering this discovery, one will also be force to reckon with the fact that lighthouses, islands, monuments, statues, and cityscapes, can also verifiably be seen beyond the scientifically accepted formula for determining the sphericity of the earth.

Likewise when considering the natural properties and physics of water, it is difficult to conceive in affirmation how the earth’s oceans, could possibly adhere to its surface given that water will always drip or leak off, of any form which does not like a basin contain it. Water always at its lowest point gathers in pool before settling out in level.

Becoming aware of this information, I in 2015 published the first of a three book series called Flat Earth As Key To Decrypt The Book Of Enoch to bring others to awareness on this issue.

Contest:

after this publication a competent and what I had learned in my research, it is then that I had the idea of holding a contest which would likewise challenge others to themselves investigate this discrepancy. My hope was that others would also recognize that something was amiss according to what we have traditionally been taught in academia. Offering $5000 to any individual anywhere in the world, the payout was contingent on somebody submitting two scientifically repeatable experiments, which could verify the curvature of the earth according to the rate and accepted formula for determining such declination, should the earth be a sphere with a 25,000 mile circumference.

The contest ran from August of 2016 until November 2017, the date of the First International Flat Earth Convention held in Raleigh, North Carolina. William Thompson was one of many which inquired to and tried to meet the challenges of the contest. Over the course of several months I had many discussions with him where I pointed out the clear evidence that one can visually see structures like landmarks, cityscapes, statues, lighthouses, and even islands beyond what was accepted as being the formula for determining such curvature. I very clearly stated in the rule of that one would have to produce experiments which were verifiable in real world scenario and situation and which could be repeated by others in following similar scientific method.

Creating two software programs, one to measure the distance between towers on the Golden Gate Bridge and the other to measure the so-called curvature of the earth when watching sunset from both the base and top of a building, Thompson was never able to create or present any type of experiment which could truly confirm the rate of curvature as decided upon by mathematicians and scientists themselves for determining that rate.

He instead submitted several videos where he argued with me over the formula for determining measurable curvature. I implored him to conduct a simple laser test to see if measurable curvature truly did exist. Refusing to do so and attempting to argue from a hypothetical point of view, I had to let some point just simply not respond to his attempts to base his evidence on conjecture. If one is not going to look at the real world evidence, there is no amount of convincing to one that is dead set against open-mindedly examining facts.

My conclusions are based on numerous real-world examples as I will list scenario below. It was made clear however in the rules, that the designed experiments must adhere to and confirm the formula for determining such declination. As the court is forced to consider, his so-called evidence cannot be verified in real world situation. Thus, the ‘experiments’ which he submitted were in no way applicable or accepted by me as evidentiary proof.

The following Real-World Evidence is as I suggest proof of Rowbotham’s Bedford Level experiment.

Example 1:

Using the formula for calculating measurable curvature, we apply them to real world scenarios like for instance, New York’s Statue of Liberty. Standing 326 feet above sea level, she can be, on a clear day, seen from as far as 60 miles away. Applying the formula for determining the rate of measurable curvature on a globular Earth, such appearance should be impossible given 2,072 feet of curvature should exist in obstruction between Lady Liberty and the viewers at that distance.

Example 2:


more inside:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10217423702561248&id=1135430279

沒有留言: