他今天説'叫香港獨立有沒有罪?當然有!',在新國安法之下掌權人都已話哂事,何祇'以言入罪',連'莫須有'都照樣可以入罪,根本就公字都贏。
要點做都吹你唔漲,振英又何須舉幾個譬喻不倫的例子去支持自己的説法呢。
在極權國家叫獨立多會犯法被捕,但在民主國家根本不當這是一回事,不單叫獨立,連獨立公投也被容許,加泰和蘇格蘭便是例子。
在航機上大叫'我要刧機',犯的是反恐法;
至於'我要殺死總統/首相',三年前台灣發生過一次,檢方以言論自由作不起訴的理據;
但美國法庭會根據憲法第一修訂案考慮及平衡政府維護總統的利益和言論自由的權利,判決並不是一面倒地'肯定'入獄。而外國人入罪則被判遞解出境。
民主國家的'以言入罪'都是清楚列明、明碼實價,不歸於國家安全法內,並且有陪審團和公開審訊。不像振英你和香港國安法那樣斷章取義和含糊不清囉,振英你係人大副主席身份,言行都和國家的體面尤關,都係做多些硏究才發言,否則好多人不是死於國法,而是為你而笑死😂。
=====
恐嚇美國總統屬重罪
Threatening the President of the United States
Threatening the president of the United States is a federal felony under United States Code Title 18, Section 871.[1][2][3][4] It consists of knowingly and willfully mailing or otherwise making "any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the president of the United States". This also includes presidential candidates and former presidents. The United States Secret Service investigates suspected violations of this law and monitors those who have a history of threatening the president. Threatening the president is considered a political offense.[5] Immigrants who commit this crime can be deported.[6]
Because the offense consists of pure speech, the courts have issued rulings attempting to balance the government's interest in protecting the president with free speech rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. According to the book Stalking, Threatening, and Attacking Public Figures, "Hundreds of celebrity howlers threaten the president of the United States every year, sometimes because they disagree with his policies, but more often just because he is the president."[7]
more:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_President_of_the_United_States
講的一套、做的一套並沒有衝突,詐儍扮懵面皮夠厚就得:
======
回力鏢？
2020年7月4日
鄭若驊指不少國家都有相關法例，甚至罰則更嚴，美國亦有域外管轄法例，認為如果沒有法律懲罰外國人在外國做危害國家安全的事，是講不過去。
2016年9月27日
中國外交部例行記者會上，發言人耿爽回應稱：「我們反對任何國家根據國內法對中方實體或個人實施『長臂管轄』（域外管轄）。」
https://www.facebook.com/102986481093278/posts/309054593819798/
沒有留言:
發佈留言