In Addition To Vaccines, Rockefeller Foundation Presents Anti-Fertility GM Food for “Widespread Use”Jurriaan Maessen
Prison Planet.com
Monday, August 30, 2010
It seems there is no limit to the Rockefeller Foundation’s ambitions to introduce anti-fertility compounds into either existing “health-services”, such as vaccines, or- as appears to be the case now- average consumer-products.似乎沒有任何限制施加在洛克菲勒基金會的野心，去引進抗生育化合物進入現成的“健康服務”例如疫苗，或出現為現在情況的普通消費產品。
The 1985 Rockefeller Foundation’s annual report underlined its ongoing dedication towards finding good use for the anti-fertility substance“gossypol”, or C30H30O8 – as the description reads.
1985年洛克菲勒基金會的年度報告，強調它的進行中的專心致力，朝向尋找好用途給抗生育物質“棉酚”，或C30H30O8 - 正如讀取描述。
Indeed, gossypol, a toxic polyphenol derived from the cotton plant, was identified early on in the Foundation’s research as an effective sterilant. The question was, how to implement or integrate the toxic substance into crops.
棉酚事實上是一有毒多酚出自棉花植物，早期被基金會的研究確定，作為一種有效的消毒劑。問題是，如何執行或整合那有毒物質進入作物。
“Another long-term interest of the Foundation has been gossypol, a compound that has been shown to have an antifertility effect in men, By the end of 1985, the Foundation had made grants totaling approximately $1.6 million in an effort to support and stimulate scientific investigations on the safety and efficacy of gossypol.”
“另一項基金會的長遠利益一直是棉酚，一種化合物已被顯示在男人具有抗生育作用。到1985年年底，基金會已撥款總額約為 160萬美元，是為了支持和促進科學調查在棉酚的安全性和有效性。“
In the 1986 Rockefeller Foundation annual report, the organization admits funding research into the use of fertility-reducing compounds in relation to food for “widespread use”:
在洛克菲勒基金會1986年的年度報告，組織承認資助研究和食物有關的減少生育化合物的使用作“廣泛用途”：
“Male contraceptive studies are focused on gossypol, a natural substance extracted from the cotton plant, and identified by Chinese researchers as having an anti-fertility effect on men. Before widespread use can be recommended, further investigation is needed to see if lowering the dosage can eliminate undesirable side-effects without reducing its effectiveness as a contraceptive. The Foundation supported research on gossypol’s safety, reversibility and efficacy in seven different 1986 grants.”
“男性的避孕研究是集中在棉酚，一種天然物質提取自棉花植物，並由中國研究人員確定對男人具有抗生育作用。在推薦作廣泛使用之前，進一步調查是有需要的，以看看是否可降低劑量以能消除不希望的副作用，而作為一種避孕物沒有降低其有效性。基金會支持棉酚的安全性、可逆性和有效性的研究，在1986年的7個不同的補助金。“
It seems that the funded scientists have indeed found a way of “lowering the dosage” of gossypol, circumventing the toxicity of the substance, so as to suppress or even eliminate these “undesirable side-effects”, which include: low blood potassium levels, fatigue, muscle weakness and even paralysis. If these effects could be eliminated without reducing the anti-fertility effects, the Foundation figured, it would be a highly effective and almost undetectable sterilant.
看來受資助的科學家已確實發現一種方法去“降低棉酚的劑量”，繞開毒性物質，以抑制或甚至消除這些“不受歡迎的副作用”，其中包括：低血鉀水平、疲勞、肌肉無力及甚至癱瘓。如果這些影響能被消除而不降低抗生育作用，基金會計算它將是一種高度有效，及幾乎無法探測的不育劑。
Although overtly, research into and development of gossypol as a anti-fertility compound was abandoned in the late 1990s, the cottonseed containing the substance was especially selected for mass distribution in the beginning of the current decade. Around 2006 a media-campaign was launched, saying the cottonseed could help defeat hunger and poverty.
In 2006, NatureNews reported that RNA interference (or RNAi) was the way to go. On the one hand it would “cut the gossypol content in cottonseeds by 98%, while leaving the chemical defenses of the rest of the plant intact.” Furthermore, the article quoted Dr. Deborah P. Delmer, the Rockefeller Foundation’s associate director of food security, who was quick to bury any concern:
“Deborah Delmer, associate director of the Rockefeller Foundation in New York City and an expert in agricultural food safety, points out that a benefit of using RNAi technology is that it turns off a gene process rather than switching on a novel function. “So instead of introducing a new foreign protein, you’re just shutting down one process,” Delmer says. “In that sense, I think that the safety concerns should be far less than other GM technologies.”
A 2006, National Geographic article Toxin-Free Cottonseed Engineered; Could Feed Millions Study Says, quotes the director of the Laboratory for Crop Transformation (Texas A&M Universtity), Keerti Singh Rathore as saying:
“A gossypol-free cottonseed would significantly contribute to human nutrition and health, particularly in developing countries, and help meet the requirements of the predicted 50 percent increase in the world population in the next 50 years.”
“Rathore’s study”, states the article, “represents the first substantiated case where gossypol was reduced via genetic engineering that targets the genes that make the toxin.”
I bring into recollection the statement made by the Rockefeller Foundation in its 1986 annual report, which reads:
“Before widespread use can be recommended, further investigation is needed to see if lowering the dosage can eliminate undesirable side-effects without reducing its effectiveness as a contraceptive.”
In the 1997 Foundational report, Rathore is mentioned (page 68). A postdoctoral fellowship-grant was given to a certain E. Chandrakanth “for advanced study in plant molecular biology under the direction of Keerti S. Rathore, Laboratory for Crop Transformation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.”
Compromising connections, in other words, for someone who claimed academic objectivity in regards to gossypol and its sterilizing effects. Rathore explained the workings of RNAi in a 2006 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“Cottonseed toxicity due to gossypol is a long-standing problem”, Rathore said, “and people have tried to fix it but haven’t been able to through traditional plant breeding. My area of research is plant transgenics, so I thought about using some molecular approaches to address this problem.”
Rathore also mentioned the desired main funder of his work without actually saying the name:
“we are trying to find some partners and will probably be looking at charitable foundations to help us out in terms of doing all kinds of testing that is required before a genetically engineered plant is approved for food or feed. We are in the very early stages and have a lot of ideas in mind, but we need to pursue those. Hopefully, we can find some sort of partnership that will allow us to do them.”
He also expressed the final adaptation of the cottonseed for widespread use is something of the long term:
“(…) right now there are many hurdles when you are dealing with a genetically modified plant. But I think in the next 15 or 20 years a lot of these regulations that we have to satisfy will be eliminated or reduced substantially.”
The Foundation, as is evident from the statements of Rockefeller’s own Deborah Delmer, is more than interested. Even worse, through the process of readying gossypol for mass-distribution in food, the fulfillment of their longstanding goal of sterilizing the populous into oblivion comes into view
http://www.prisonplanet.com/in-addition-to-vaccines-rockefeller-foundation-presents-anti-fertility-gm-food-for-%e2%80%9cwidespread-use%e2%80%9d.html
蘋果基因破解 可培育更佳品種
(法新社)2010年8月30日 星期一 12:20
（法新社巴黎 29日電） 科學家今天表示，他們已經確定世人最喜愛的水果之一蘋果的基因序列，可能因此培育出更脆、更味美多汁的品種。科學家在「自然遺傳學」（Nature Genetics）期刊發表文章說，蘋果基因包含6億個鹼基配對（basepairs），也就是去氧核糖核酸（DNA）基因碼階梯的每1階。
蘋果是薔薇科的1員，而所有開花植物當中有1/3屬於薔薇科，包括許多水果植物，例如桃子、覆盆子、梨子和草莓。
根據研究，這幾種水果雖然各有不同，但在基因上有許多相似之處，蘋果的DNA有很大部份在其他水果的基因上也找得到。
但這些水果的基因序列卻很不一樣。
蘋果跟最接近的水果梨子一樣，有17個染色體，但其他水果只有7或9個染色體。
這表示這些水果可能有個共同的「蘋果祖先」，在5000到6500萬年前才開始有不同變化。
有意思的是，白堊紀末期地球遭逢巨大變故導致恐龍絕跡，也大致是這個時候的事。
參與這項研究的紐西蘭 植物與食物研究所（NewZealand Plant and Food Research）科學家賈迪納（Sue Gardiner）表示：「蘋果複製了蘋果祖先所有的基因組，如今跟桃子、覆盆子和草莓有了很不一樣的水果特質。這顯示有個重大的環境事件迫使蘋果等物種為了生存而演化。」
農業科學家在加緊研究主要食物的基因序列，以便找出可以加強產量、生長韌性、風味和其他特質的遺傳特徵。
一旦找出這些基因，就可以分殖出不同品種，而通常的做法是利用傳統培育方式而不是基因改造。（譯者：中央社陳正杰）
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/100830/8/jygo.html
轉基因食品在21世紀已使人類弱智
比爾蓋茨會參加 2010年彼爾德伯格會議
The Rockefeller Foundation praised Hitler's sterilization program in Nazi Germany. ...
這家超市的“健康食品”在三個星期殺死這些幼鼠
大衛洛克菲勒渡假時在智利機場被對抗
多家製藥公司削減疫苗價格
揭破比爾•蓋茨“用慈善改變世界”的真相！
沒有留言:
發佈留言