專業評: 世衞蠢材痰德塞發文説他的説法是建基於'進展中的證據',那即是沒有證據。"真科學"的證據定義是不含糊的預測,有含糊之處便不是證據,沒有'進展中的證據'這回事!
This idiot @DrTedros at @WHO has ZERO idea of the definition of "evidence." There is nothing called "evolving evidence" - that means he has NO evidence. The DEFINITION of EVIDENCE according to REAL SCIENCE, is unambiguous predictions. If there is ambiguity, it is not evidence.
#TruthFreedomHealth
#Shiva4Senate @ World Health Organization (WHO)
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=3157815574274939&id=212669305456262
沒有留言:
發佈留言