另一條索羅斯觸鬚暴露

另一條索羅斯的觸鬚暴露
Yet another Soros tentacle exposed
Editor’s comment: Jim Wallis and Sojourners are also the CFR “Christian backers” of ‘Imam’ Feisal Abdul Rauf of the so called ground zero mosque – it seems every globalist tentacle extends into this project
編輯評論：吉姆瓦利斯和索喬納斯亦是所謂的地面零清真寺的費薩爾本阿卜杜勒拉烏夫'教長'的外交關係委員會(CFR)的“基督徒支持者” - 它似乎每一條全球主義者的觸鬚都延伸到這個項目中

Thomas Lifson
American Thinker
Aug 22, 2010

Jim Wallis, the man behind the so-called “religious left” – a left wing evangelical activist who worked to get evangelical support for Obama — has been exposed as another stooge of George Soros. And he had the gall to accuse Marvin Olasky, the conservative evangelical who asked Wallis to admit his connections to Soros, of lying. Sarah Pulliam Bailey
of Christianity Today’s political blog has the story:
那在所謂的“宗教偏左” - 一幫左翼福音派的活動份子努力去為奧巴馬取得福音派支持 - 背後的男子吉姆瓦利斯，已經曝光作為另一個喬治索羅斯的傀儡。而他居然指責保守福音派的馬份歐拉斯基撒謊，他要求瓦利斯承認他與索羅斯的聯繫。 今日基督教薩拉普利亞姆貝利的政治博客有此故事：

Jim Wallis has admitted that Sojourners has received funding in the past from liberal billionaire George Soros’ Open Society Institute.
吉姆威利斯已承認索喬納斯已在過去收到撥款，來自開放的億萬富翁喬治索羅斯的開放社會研究所。
Last month, Marvin Olasky asked Wallis to admit his affiliations on the left when [he] reported on the money from Soros in World magazine. [snip]
Wallis suggested that Olasky was lying.
上個月，馬份歐拉斯基要求瓦利斯承認他的左傾背景，當[他]在世界雜誌報告錢來自索羅斯。 [剪斷] 瓦利斯提出歐拉斯基在撒謊。
“It’s not hyperbole or overstatement to say that Glenn Beck lies for a living. I’m sad to see Marvin Olasky doing the same thing. No, we don’t receive money from Soros. Given the financial crisis of nonprofits, maybe Marvin should call Soros and ask him to send us money.
“它不是誇張或誇張去說，格倫貝克靠撒謊為生。我很遺憾看到馬份歐拉斯基做同樣的事情。不，我們沒有從索羅斯收到錢。由於非營利組織的金融危機，也許馬份應該呼籲索羅斯，並要求他給我們錢。
But Olasky has the goods on Wallis’s Big Lie:
但歐拉斯基在瓦利斯的大謊言有料：
Want to see for yourself what someone apparently did not want you to see? Click here to download the PDF, go to page 225, and you’ll see the grant to Sojourners.
自己想去看看顯然地某人不要你看到的東西？點擊這裡下載 PDF格式去225頁，你會看到給索喬納斯的補助金。
You can also see the 2006 grant by downloading the 990-PF for that year and going to page 125. And by the way, look at page 114 of the 990-PF for 2007: another $100,000 grant to Sojourners “to support the Christians for Comprehensive Immigration Reform campaign.”
您還可看到2006年那一年的補助金，下載 990 -PF去125頁。並順便，看看2007年 990 -PF的 114頁 ：另外給索喬納斯的10萬美元贈款，去“支持基督徒綜合移民改革運動。”
Wallis is claiming incompetence as his excuse, now that he has been exposed:
瓦利斯聲稱他的無能作為藉口，現在他已經被暴露：
I should have declined to comment until I was able to review the blog post in question and consulted with our staff on the details of our funding over the past several years. Instead, I answered in the spirit of the accusation and did not recall the details of our funding over the decade in question. The spirit of the accusation was that Sojourners is beholden to funders on the political left, which is false. The allegation concerned three grants received over 10 years from the Open Society Institute that made up the tiniest fraction of Sojourners’ funding during that decade.

Olasky notes:

Sojourners revenues have more than tripled-from $1,601,171 in 2001-2002 to $5,283,650 in 2008-2009-as secular leftists have learned to use the religious left to elect Obama and others.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/yet-another-soros-tentacle-exposed.html

羅富齊和香港李家家族介紹

喬治索羅斯：傀儡話事人

索羅斯在中國的秘密行動

索羅斯兜售中國作為新世界秩序大哥

新的索羅斯投資基金從奧巴馬的'綠色議程'取利

羅傑斯抄底，索羅斯做空，果真上來了？

索羅斯基金會與“顔色革命”