搜尋此網誌

2018年11月19日星期一

科學家回答醫療行業關於鋁安全的失實宣稱

科學家回答醫療行業關於鋁安全的失實宣稱
Scientist Replies To The Medical Industry’s False Claims About Aluminum Safety

The Facts: Aluminum.org is a pro-aluminum industry website. It even lists an Aluminum Caucus. This is a look into their list of “myths” about the safety of aluminum product they promote to see if their claims pass the proof-by-Pubmed test.

Reflect On: With all of the science clearly contradicting the medical and aluminum industry's claims of safety, how are they still able to approve the use of aluminum in our medications? It makes to sense, especially from a scientific standpoint.

“Myth” #1: Exposure to aluminum causes Alzheimer’s Disease

Aluminum.org Claim: “Aluminum is not linked to Alzheimer’s disease, the cause (or causes) of which is unknown. In the words of the Alzheimer’s Association, ‘The research community is generally convinced that aluminum is not a key risk factor in developing Alzheimer’s disease.’

The World Health Organization has also concluded that “there is no evidence to support a primary causative role of aluminum in Alzheimer’s disease.’”

JLW’S ANALYSIS: It is highly odd to see the Alzheimer’s Association and the World Health Organization describing a type of consensus that there is no role for aluminum as a primary cause in Alzheimer’s disease for one simple fact: amyloid, the gunk that gums up the brain in Alzheimer’s dementia, is part aluminum. In fact, this has been known since 1985 [1].

…when the substance IS the condition, no level of epidemiological evidence will overrule the direct finding of the substance at the site of the disease manifestation.

So why and how could these organizations claim that aluminum does not play a primary causal role? The most likely explanation is the use of incorrect science and/or focus on the incorrect level of evidence. When a substance is co-localized to the site of condition, that’s pretty strong evidence that is play some role in the process – even if it is an inhibitory role, it’s still a role. But when the substance IS the condition, no level of epidemiological evidence will overrule the direct finding of the substance at the site of the disease manifestation.

Examples include asbestos and various lung conditions. Asbestos fibres are extremely small; the most dangerous are <2 a="" and="" asbestos="" asbestosis="" breathe="" cancer="" cause="" effusion="" fibre="" fibres="" for="" in="" inflammation="" leading="" long="" lung="" mesothelioma="" microns.="" or="" p="" plaques="" pleural="" remain="" scarring="" the="" thickening="" time="" tissue="" to="" when="" widespread="" you="">


https://www.collective-evolution.com/2018/11/18/scientist-replies-to-the-medical-industrys-false-claims-about-aluminum-safety/




沒有留言: