WEATHER MODIFICATION
一件隱蔽的大殺傷力武器
A COVERT WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION
第1部分
PART 1
概覽美國的人工影響天氣
AN OVERVIEW OF WEATHER MODIFICATION IN THE USA
“And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.” Revelation 11:18
" 外 邦 發 怒 、 你 的 忿 怒 也 臨 到 了 ． 審 判 死 人 的 時 候 也 到 了 ． 你 的 僕 人 眾 先 知 、 和 眾 聖 徒 、 凡 敬 畏 你 名 的 人 連 大 帶 小 得 賞 賜 的 時 候 也 到 了 ． 你 敗 壞 那 些 敗 壞 世 界 之 人 的 時 候 也 就 到 了 。 "啟 示 錄11:18
PART 1.
OVERVIEW OF WEATHER MODIFICATION IN THE USA
概覽美國的人工影響天氣
Video Presentation: “Aerosol Crimes & Cover-Up”
視頻介紹：“氣溶膠犯罪與掩蓋”
Aerosol Crimes (aka 'Chemtrails') Clifford Carnicom, 2005
氣溶膠罪行（又名“病毒拖曳”）2005 克利福德Carnicom，
2010-12-17
Photos of Arkansas Chemtrails
阿肯色州的病毒拖曳照片
“How To Wreck the Environment” by Gordon MacDonald
戈登麥克唐納的“如何破壞環境”
第2部分
PART 2.
THE PLANNED DESTRUCTION OF THE UNITED STATES / SPRING & SUMMER OF 2011
計劃了的美國破壞 /2011年春夏
第3部分
PART 3.
WARNING OF MISSOURI RIVER *FLOOD OF BIBLICAL PROPORTIONS*
警告密蘇里河*聖經規模的洪水*
By Barbara Aho
June 2, 2011
Translation by Autumnson Blog
AN OVERVIEW OF WEATHER MODIFICATION IN THE USA
概覽美國的人工影響天氣
Between 1962 and 1983, the United States Navy, the U.S. Weather Bureau and the National Science Foundation carried out an experimental research program that was yielding some success in moderating hurricanes. Project Stormfury was suspended, however, and eventually terminated for specious reasons. Commenting on an overview of The Stormfury Era by the Hurricane Research Division of the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Dick Eastman, MS, MA, noted that the privatization of weather-related government agencies was a factor in the termination of this project:
在1962年和1983年之間，美國海軍、美國氣象局和美國國家科學基金會實行一項實驗性研究計劃，獲得一些緩和颶風的成功效果。但是，播雲項目被叫停，和最終地被終止以似是而非的理由。在評論到播雲時代的概覽，大西洋海洋與氣象實驗室的颶風研究部迪克伊士曼MS,MA指出，在終止該項目上天氣有關的政府機構被私有化是一個因素：
“[Project Stormfury] was discontinued just as new planes for doing the interventions were made available. It seems that we had a deliberate effort to stifle success at the very time that the national weather bureau and other weather-related government agencies were being privatized (the National Weather Service, like the Federal Reserve Bank, the Atomic Energy Commission and the National Science Foundation are privately owned and controlled organizations -- each operating in their respective fields in totally unregulated and largely unsupervised environments, with the public thinking that each is part of the government...Gordon J. F. MacDonald (1929-2002) was an associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at UCLA, a member of President Lyndon Johnson’s Science Advisory Committee and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. In his 1968 book, Unless Peace Comes: A Scientific Forecast Of New Weapons, MacDonald wrote a chapter titled “How to Wreck the Environment” in which he revealed that weather modification was in the experimental stages. MacDonald predicted that it would only be a matter of time before man would be able to manipulate the weather for use as a weapon:
“Storm Fury demonstrated -- regardless of the sophistry -- that hurricane winds can be reduced from 130 mph to 75 or 80 mph -- a difference that means the a difference of billions in damages and of doubtless many lives.
“But we are not only seeing the deliberate decision to let disaster happen when it could be prevented -- we are seeing something much worse -- the deliberate use of this technology developed by minds that sought to help mankind as a means of destroying our homes and killing our people for the sake of ’disaster-industry’ profit and ‘national-emergency’ power.” (1096)
戈登JF麥克唐納（1929年至2002年）是加州大學地球物理和行星物理系的副主任、一位林登約翰遜總統的科學顧問委員會成員和一位外交關係理事會的成員。 在他1968年的書除非和平來了：一件新武器的科學預測中，麥克唐納寫出一篇題為“如何破壞環境”，在內他透露人工影響天氣是在實驗階段。麥克唐納預測，在人會能夠操縱天氣作為武器之前將只是一個時間問題：
“Among future means of obtaining national objectives by force, one possibility hinges on man’s ability to control and manipulate the environment of his planet. When achieved, this power over his environment will provide man with a new force capable of doing great and indiscriminate damage. Our present primitive understanding of deliberate environmental change makes it difficult to imagine a world in which geophysical warfare is practised. Such a world might be one in which nuclear weapons were effectively banned and the weapons of mass destruction were those of environmental catastrophe. As I will argue, these weapons are peculiarly suited for covert or secret wars...In his 1970 book, Between Two Ages, former U.S. National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brezezinski (CFR/TC/B) mentioned “weather control” as a “new weapon” for the U.S. military and a “key element of strategy.”
“As economic competition among many advanced nations heightens, it may be to a country’s advantage to ensure a peaceful natural environment for itself and a disturbed environment for its competitors. Operations producing such conditions might be carried out covertly, since nature’s great irregularity permits storms, floods, droughts, earthquakes and tidal waves to be viewed as unusual but not unexpected. Such a ‘secret war’ need never be declared or even known by the affected populations. It could go on for years with only the security forces involved being aware of it. The years of drought and storm would be attributed to unkindly nature and only after a nation were thoroughly drained would an armed take-over be attempted.
“In addition to their covert nature, a feature common to several modification schemes is their ability to affect the Earth as a whole. The environment knows no political boundaries; it is independent of the institutions based on geography and the effects of modification can be projected from any one point to any other on the Earth. Because environmental modification may be a dominant feature of future world decades, there is concern that this incipient technology is in total conflict with many of the traditional geographical and political units and concepts.
“Political, legal, economic and sociological consequences of deliberate environmental modification, even for peaceful purposes, will be of such complexity that perhaps all our present involvements in nuclear affairs will seem simple.”
在他1970年的書在兩個時代中，美國前國家安全顧問茲比格涅夫 Brezezinski（CFR/TC/B）提到“天氣控制”作為美國軍方的“新武器”和一項“戰略的關鍵因素。”
“Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised... Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.”Also in 1970, the U.S. Weather Bureau was renamed the National Weather Service and the privatization of the weather-related government agencies began, a process that was expedited under President Bill Clinton.
亦在1970年，美國氣象局被更名為國家氣象局，及私有化天氣相關的政府機構開始，一項過程在克林頓總統的領導下加快。
“In accordance with the Administration’s FY 1996 Proposed Budget and the Administration’s Reinventing Government initiatives issued in early 1995, the National Weather Service (NWS) initiated a transition program to transfer NWS Agricultural Weather Services and non-federal non-wildfire weather support to private meteorological firms willing to assume these responsibilities...In 1977, the Geneva Convention proposed an international treaty prohibiting the military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques. The Convention opened for signature on May 18, 1977 in Geneva and the treaty was enforced on October 5, 1978. Eighty-seven (87) nations signed this treaty:
“The transition of agricultural weather services to the private sector is dynamic. Both the NWS and the private meteorological sector will need to continue to work together to provide maximum service to the nation’s growers. Privatization efforts are not new to the NWS. Over the years, the NWS has transferred services such as direct commercial radio and television broadcasts, newspaper weather page preparation, and weather by phone successfully to the private sector.” (National Weather Service)
1977年，日內瓦公約提出一項國際條約禁止在軍事或其它敵對目的上使用改變環境的技術。該公約1977年5月18日在日內瓦開放供簽署，和條約在1978年10月5日執行，八十七（87）個國家簽署了該條約：
CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USEIn 1996, the U.S. Air Force published a research paper produced in the Department of Defense titled, “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.” Disregarding the Geneva Convention Treaty on Weather Modification, the stated purpose of the paper was “to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives...”
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES
Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977
Entered into force October 5, 1978
Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979
U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980
The States Parties to this Convention,
Guided by the interest of consolidating peace, and wishing to contribute to the cause of halting the arms race, and of bringing about general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control, and of saving mankind from the danger of using new means of warfare,
Determined to continue negotiations with a view to achieving effective progress towards further measures in the field of disarmament,
Recognizing that scientific and technical advances may open new possibilities with respect to modification of the environment,
Recalling the Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment adopted at Stockholm on 16 June 1972,
Realizing that the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes could improve the interrelationship of man and nature and contribute to the preservation and improvement of the environment for the benefit of present and future generations,
Recognizing, however, that military or any other hostile use of such techniques could have effects extremely harmful to human welfare,
Desiring to prohibit effectively military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques in order to eliminate the dangers to mankind from such use, and affirming their willingness to work towards the achievement of this objective,
Desiring also to contribute to the strengthening of trust among nations and to the further improvement of the international situation in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,
Have agreed as follows:
Article I
1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.
2. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to assist, encourage or induce any State, group of States or international organization to engage in activities contrary to the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article. (continued)
1996年，美國空軍發表一份產生於國防部的研究論文，題為“天氣作為力量的倍增器：2025年擁有天氣。”不顧人工影響天氣的日內瓦公約條款，論文的既定目的是“勾勒出一項使用未來天氣改變系統的戰略以實現軍事目標...
“2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government...In 1997, former Secretary of Defense William Cohen revealed that electromagnetic weapons were being used to manipulate the environment. The following remarks were made by Cohen at a Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy held in Athens, GA:
“In 2025, US aerospace forces can ‘own the weather’ by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.
“A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary...”
Contents
Chapter
Disclaimer
Illustrations
Tables
Acknowledgments
Executive Summary
Introduction
Required Capability
Why Would We Want to Mess with the Weather?
What Do We Mean by “Weather-modification”?
System Description
The Global Weather Network
Applying Weather-modification to Military Operations
Concept of Operations
Precipitation
Fog
Storms
Exploitation of “NearSpace” for Space Control
Opportunities Afforded by Space Weather-modification
Communications Dominance via Ionospheric Modification
Artificial Weather
Concept of Operations Summary
Investigation Recommendations
How Do We Get There From Here?
Conclusions
Appendix
A Why Is the Ionosphere Important?
B Research to Better Understand and Predict Ionospheric Effects
C Acronyms and Definitions
Bibliography
Notes
Illustrations
Figure
3-1. Global Weather Network
3-2. The Military System for Weather-Modification Operations
4-1. Crossed-Beam Approach for Generating an Artificial Ionospheric Mirror
4-2. Artificial Ionospheric Mirrors Point-to-Point Communications
4-3. Artificial Ionospheric Mirror Over-the-Horizon Surveillance Concept
4-4. Scenarios for Telecommunications Degradation
5-1. A Core Competency Road Map to Weather Modification in 2025
5-2. A Systems Development Road Map to Weather Modification in 2025
Table
1 - Operational Capabilities Matrix
1997年，前國防部長科恩揭露電磁武器被用來操縱環境。以下言論是由科恩在一次於雅典舉行恐怖主義、大規模殺傷性武器和美國戰略的會議上作出：
“Others [scientists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations... It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts.” (U.S. Department of Defense News Transcript)In 2005, bills that would have regulated the various weather agencies were introduced in both houses of the U.S. Congress. H.R. 2995 was designed to officially institutionalize within the U.S. Government a major “weather modification” policy and program under the Secretary of the Department of Commerce. Senate Bill S. 517, entitled “Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act of 2005” and scheduled to take effect on October 1, 2005, stated:
“其他人[科學家]正在參與即使在一個生態型的恐怖主義，讓他們可以改變氣候、發動地震、火山，通過使用電磁波遙遠控制...所以那裡有很多靈巧的頭腦，正在工作找出使他們能夠在其它國家報復恐怖的方法...是真的，而那就是理由為什麼我們要加緊努力。“（美國國防部新聞副本）
2005年，監管各種氣象機構的法案在美國國會的兩院被引入。 HR2995是旨在美國政府內正式制度化，在秘書商務部下，一項主要的“人工影響天氣”政策和項目。參議院法案S.517，題為“人工影響天氣研究和技術轉讓授權法2005”，並定於2005年10月1日生效，申明：
“It is the purpose of this Act to develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national weather modification policy and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather modification research and development...The stated purpose of the Act was “to develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national weather modification policy and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather modification research and development.” A Weather Modification Subcommittee was to be established comprised of representatives from NOAA, NASA and the National Science Foundation who would submit reports to and be accountable to Congress and the President:
“The Board may enter into cooperative agreements with the head of any department or agency of the United States, an appropriate official of any State or political subdivision of a State, or an appropriate official of any private or public agency or organization for conducting weather modification activities or cloud-seeding operations.
“There is authorized to be appropriated to the Board for the purposes of carrying out the provisions of this Act $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2014.”
H.R. 2995 Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act of 2005
S. 517: Weather Modification Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2005
該法例的糎清目的是“發展和實施一項全面、協調的國家人工影響天氣政策，和一個國家合作社聯邦和人工影響天氣的研究和發展的州方案。”一個人工影響天氣的小組委員會被建立，包含由NOAA、美國宇航局和美國國家科學基金會的代表，後者將提交報告向國會和總統負責：
Section 4Further consideration of the S. Bill 517 was tabled by request of President Bush and neither bill was passed.
Directs the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to establish a Weather Modification Subcommittee to coordinate a national research program on weather modification. Requires the Subcommittee to include representatives from:
(1) the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA);
(2) the National Science Foundation (NSF); and
(3) the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
Provides for a representative from NOAA and a representative from NSF to serve together as co-chairs of such Subcommittee.
Requires the Director to develop and submit a plan for coordinated federal activities under the program, which shall:
(1) for a ten-year period, establish the goals and priorities for federal research that most effectively advances scientific understanding of weather modification;
(2) describe specific activities required to achieve such goals and priorities, including funding of competitive research grants, training and support for scientists, and participation in international research efforts;
(3) identify and address, as appropriate, relevant programs and activities of the federal agencies and departments that would contribute to the program;
(4) consider and use, as appropriate, reports and studies conducted by federal agencies and departments, and other expert scientific bodies, including the National Research Council report on Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research;
(5) make recommendations for the coordination of program activities with weather modification activities of other national and international organizations;
(6) incorporate recommendations from the Weather Modification Research Advisory Board; and
(7) estimate federal funding for research activities to be conducted under the program.
Specifies activities related to weather modification that may be included under the program, including:
(1) interdisciplinary research and coordination of research and activities to improve understanding of processes relating to weather modification, including cloud modeling, cloud seeding, improving forecast and decision-making technologies, related severe weather research, and potential adverse affects of weather modification;
(2) development, through partnerships among federal agencies, states, and academic institutions, of new technologies and approaches for weather modification; and
(3) scholarships and educational opportunities that encourage an interdisciplinary approach to weather modification.
Requires the Director to prepare and submit to the President and Congress annual reports on the activities conducted pursuant to this Act respecting the Weather Modification Subcommittee, including:
(1) a summary of the achievements of federal weather modification research;
(2) an analysis of the progress made toward achieving the goals and objectives of the plan;
(3) a copy or summary of the plan and any changes made to it;
(4) a summary of agency budgets for weather modification activities;
(5) any recommendations regarding additional action or legislation that may be required to assist in achieving the purposes of this Act;
(6) a description of the relationship between research conducted on weather modification and research conducted pursuant to the Global Change Research Act of 1990, as well as research on weather forecasting and prediction; and
(7) a description of any potential adverse consequences on life, property, or water resource availability from weather modification efforts, and any suggested means of mitigating or reducing such consequences if such efforts are undertaken.
Section 5
Establishes in the Office of Science and Technology Policy the Weather Modification Research Advisory Board to:
(1) make recommendations to the Weather Modification Subcommittee on matters related to weather modification; and
(2) advise such Subcommittee on the research and development, studies, and investigations with respect to potential uses of technologies and observation systems for weather modification research and assessments and evaluations of the efficacy of weather modification, both purposeful, (including cloud-seeding operations) and inadvertent (including downwind effects and anthropogenic effects).
Section 6
Instructs U.S. departments and agencies and any other public or private agencies and institutions that receive research funds from the United States related to weather modification to give full support and cooperation to the Weather Modification Subcommittee.
進一步審議法案 S.517被提出，由美國總統布殊要求及沒有法案獲得通過。
“In a December 13, 2005, letter to Senator Hutchison, John H. Marburger, III, Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President, wrote:Another bill was was proposed in 2007 which also did not pass. The intent of S. 1807 was to permit experimentation on the weather in the United States:
“The Administration respectfully requests that you defer further consideration of the bill pending the outcome of an inter-agency discussion of these issues that the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) would coordinate – with the Department of Justice on legal issues, with the Department of State on foreign policy implications, with the Departments of Defense and State on national security implications, and with pertinent research agencies to consider the reasons the U.S. Government previously halted its work in this area. At the conclusion of this review, the Administration would report back to you on the results of these discussions so you are fully apprised of all possible issues associated with authorizing a new Federal program on this topic.” (SourceWatch)
另一條在2007年提出的法案也沒有通過，S.1807的目的是為允許在美國作天氣試驗：
“(3) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT- The term ‘research and development’ means theoretical analysis, exploration, experimentation, and the extension of investigative findings and theories of a scientific or technical nature into practical application for experimental and demonstration purposes, including the experimental production and testing of models, devices, equipment, materials, and processes.”In 2011, the House of Rothschild acquired a majority stake in Weather Central, the world’s leader in weather, forecasting, traffic, news and sports systems.
S. 1807: Weather Mitigation Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2007
2011年，羅富齊家族獲得天氣中央的多數股權，它是世界的天氣、預報、交通、新聞和體育系統的領導者。
January 31, 2011 03:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time
“E.L. Rothschild LLC Acquires a Majority Stake in Weather Central, LP Sir Evelyn and Lynn Forester de Rothschild’s Firm Sees Opportunity for Growth in Multi-Platform Weather Solutions Company”
“NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--E.L. Rothschild LLC, a private investment company led by Chairman Sir Evelyn de Rothschild and CEO Lynn Forester de
Rothschild, today announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Weather Central, LP (www.wxc.com). The world’s leading provider of interactive weather graphics and data services for television, web, and mobile, Weather Central’s highly accurate and personalized forecasting offers businesses and consumers a truly unique suite of science-driven weather information products. The company will continue to operate under CEO and founder, Terry Kelly, as well as current management. Financial terms of the acquisition were not disclosed...
“Chairman of E.L. Rothschild LLC, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, added: ‘... As weather becomes more extreme around the planet, with greater human and financial ramifications, we believe that Weather Central will play a major role in mitigating damage and improving lives. This is important to the Rothschilds, as it is to Weather Central. We are proud of our new partnership with them.’” (BusinessWire)
For more please click:
http://watch.pair.com/weather-modification.html#chemtrails
美國防部承認HAARP能引發地震和火山爆發的證據
08年出土美海軍研究論文：以人造'洪水'、'旱災''擾亂經濟'
歐洲議會於1996年 確認HAARP存在
4/3/2011 -- 聯合國報告 -- HAARP可造成'重型核類型爆炸'
沒有留言:
發佈留言