Australian Green Party Leader admits Global Warming is Really all about World Government
Number Six
Activist Post
Saturday, July 2, 2011
The Australian Green Party has now assumed the balance of power in the Australian Senate, allowing them great potential power in policy making. The Greens, founded in 1992, are traced back to the 1970’s Club of Rome era United Tasmanian Group, the world’s first “green” party. Their moniker is self-explanatory, the basis of their charter being ecology and the environmental movement.
澳大利亞綠黨現已承擔澳洲參議院的均勢，使他們在決策上有很大權力的潛力。綠黨成立於1992年，可追溯到20世紀 70年代的羅馬俱樂部時代的聯合塔斯馬尼亞集團，世界上第一個“綠色”政黨。他們的名字是不言而喻，他們的約章基礎是生態和環保運動。
Green Party principles state that global warming, er, climate change is the greatest threat to humanity with only ten to fifteen years remaining to provide a solution. “Australia is ideally placed to lead the world in this challenge and the Greens are committed to Australia taking that lead.”[1] They also want to limit CO2 and eliminate coal use, despite the fact that CO2 is not a pollutant. Furthermore, they want to establish a “low-carbon economy” and force nations to sign binding environmental treaties restructuring the whole of society, economy and politics. They state “climate change will result in the displacement of people, creating environmental refugees and intensifying the threat of regional and global conflict.”[2].
綠黨的規章申明，全球變暖，呃，氣候變化是人類面臨的最大威脅，只剩下十到十五年去提供解決方案。 “澳洲是理想地處於位置去在這挑戰上領導世界，而綠黨致力於澳洲取得帶頭作用。”[1]他們亦希望限制二氧化碳和消除使用煤，儘管事實上二氧化碳不是污染物。此外，他們要建立一個“低碳經濟”，並迫使各國簽署具有約束力的環境條約以重組整個社會、經濟和政治。他們申明“氣候變化將導致人們的流離失所、創造環境難民和加強區域性的威脅及全球性衝突。”[2]。
In actuality, climate change policy will result in great displacement, mass impoverishment and genocide. Much has been said by real scientists on these issues such as the Sky Dragon Slayers, Piers Corbyn, Anthony Watts and thousands of others. The policy documents from the Club of Rome and the United Nations to Ecoscience detail their true agenda, in their own words. Historian and economist Webster Tarpley recently gave a lecture dissecting this documentation revealing their agenda of deindustrialization, mass involuntary sterilization, global depopulation and the establishment of what they call a “planetary regime” or what Senator Brown calls a “world parliament.”[3] India is already giving away cars in exchange for male and female sterilization.[4]
參議員布朗：世界政府是真的，沒有陰謀論了
Senator Brown: World Government is Real, No Conspiracy Theory
Australian Green leader, Senator Bob Brown, recently unveiled his hope for a “world parliament.” [5] Corporate commentators and spineless journalists proclaim the idea of a world parliament is something now to be treated seriously, not laughed at.[6] Authors and researchers discussing long laid out plans for world parliament and critical of the movement, consistently having been right on the money, have been laughed at for so long and called derogatory terms. Now we are to stop laughing and take it serious, for the time of world government is nigh.
澳大利亞綠黨領袖參議員布朗，最近展現他的“世界議會”希望[5]，企業評論員和冇骨氣的記者宣稱現在要認真對待世界一議會的想法，而不是嘲笑。[6]作者和研究人員討論制定世界議會的長期計劃和關鍵的運動，在金錢上已一貫地是對的，被嘲笑了這麼久並被稱為貶詞。現在我們要停止嘲笑和慎重看待，因為世界一政府的時代近了。
Senator Brown believes we are inevitably moving toward a world community or “global, uh, parliamentary...governance” while deriding conspiracy talk. One will notice how all politicians who make public mention of this agenda always stutter before they proclaim “global, uh, governance.” On a personal note, I was given similar treatment.
布朗相信我們都不可避免地走向一個世界社會或“全球性的，呃，議會...管治”，當在嘲笑陰謀講話的時候。人會注意到所有的政治家公開提及這一議程時總是如何結結巴巴，在宣稱“全球性的，呃，管治”之前，就我個人而言，我被給予同樣的對待。
In university, one of my professors (a psychologist) had summoned my classmate and me for coffee. Strange, but we realized he had been secretly evaluating our sanity due to the matters we were discussing in class. Upon complaining to the university head, we were given a final lecture by the latter. He derided conspiracy talk and such. However, he then went on to state that there was nothing wrong with or believing in a “world state”, that it would be here in five, ten or fifteen years. Hence, the tactic is to label any critic as crazy. The fact that there can be no debate as to the viability of world government de facto demonstrates its undemocratic nature. It does not matter that the majority do not want it, they will get it.
Though Senator Brown’s party voted against invading Iraq and Afghanistan, he goes on to state that “if we can invade Iraq and Afghanistan in the name of democracy, surely we can peacefully get behind moves to have a global governance.”[7] He adds a cherry on top by furthering that the Tobin Tax would end poverty. He is right, there is a pattern. The Iraq war was an outright lie, where the Bush Administration fabricated evidence and put into force war plans long drawn up. Afghanistan saw them go after a non-existing boogeyman, even on their own payroll, to fulfill Sir Halford Mackinder’s and Zbigniew Brzezinski’s plan to dominate the Heartland and cull the world’s heroin profits. In similar vein, global warming, I mean, climate change is based on fabricated intelligence and ulterior motives.
Walter Russell Mead writes in a recent essay, that a Global Green Carbon Treaty (GGCT) "is less a treaty than a constitution for global government. The green plan is a plan for a global constitution because the treaty will regulate economic production in every country on earth."[8]
Australia could be providing model climate framework just as the European Union laid the foundational model for regional integration, with its “extensive experience at the regional level” that is being drawn upon to integrate Africa, the Americas, the Middle East and Asia via “the Pan-African Parliament, the Mercosur Parliament and there is also the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe that includes 56 states and stretches from Vancouver to Vladivostok.”[9] Australia is attempting to spearhead the establishment of the carbon tax and other climate policy even as the EU Carbon Climate Exchange collapses, just as it did in Chicago.[10]
If anyone still doubts the genocidal nature of climate change policy, consider their idea to massacre one million camels.[11] What will happen to the millions of Central Asian herders whose animals are their lifeblood when the world parliament comes for their camels?
Notes:
[1] "Climate Change and Energy." The Greens.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Tarpley, Webster G. "The Elite's Plan for Global Extermination." YouTube. 26 Apr. 2011.
[4] "India: Rajasthan in 'cars for Sterilisation' Drive." BBC. 1 July 2011.
[5] "Australia Should Support Efforts for a Global Parliament: Green Party Leader." Campaign for a UN Parliament. 30 June 2011.
[6] Carr, Andrew. "Why Not a World Parliament?" The Interpreter | Lowy Institute for International Policy. 30 June 2011.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Mead, Walter Russell. "The Failure of Al Gore: Part Deux." The American Interest Blog Directory. 27 June 2011.
[9] See note 5.
[10] Maher, Sid. "As EU Carbon Price Slumps, Labor Offers 'battler Buffer' | The Australian." The Australian. 28 June 2011.
[11] "Aussies May Kill 1.2 Million Camels to Reduce Greenhouse Gase." The Raw Story. 9 June 2011.
This article first appeared at Global Governance Archive, an information war desk which seeks to aid researchers both new and old in sifting through the most important material on everything from economy to the architecture of global government which is now being built.
http://www.activistpost.com/2011/07/australian-green-party-leader-admits.html
綠黨領袖布朗主張世界一議會
冰河期正在來到...不要恐慌！
“小冰期”時代即將到來 地球將經歷些什麼？
洩漏的聯合國文件顯露計劃 2012年“綠色世界秩序”
沒有留言:
發佈留言