弗吉尼亞，是的，一氣候掩蓋

弗吉尼亞，是的，一氣候掩蓋
Yes, Virginia, A Climate Cover-Up
Posted 01/20/2011 06:53 PM ET
IBD Editorials
Translation by Autumnson Blog

Junk Science: Democrats in Virginia are trying to stop their attorney general from probing climate fraud carried out by university researchers at taxpayer expense. Are they afraid of finding the inconvenient truth?
垃圾科學：弗吉尼亞州的民主黨人正在試圖阻止他們的總檢察長調查氣候欺詐，由大學的研究人員以納稅人的錢進行。他們害怕找到難以忽視的真相？
It's not the crime, it's the cover-up, as the saying goes. In the case of former University of Virginia climate scientist Michael Mann and his supporters, it may be both. Not only did Mann participate in perhaps the greatest scam of modern times, but he may have also have fraudulently used taxpayer funds to do so.
不是罪行，是那掩蓋，正如說法蔓延；以前弗吉尼亞大學氣候學家邁克爾曼恩和他的支持者的個案，它可能是兩者。不僅是曼恩參與了也許是近代最大的騙局，而且他可能亦有盜用納稅人的資金去做這。
At least Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli thinks so, and has been diligently trying to obtain from U.Va. documents and e-mails related to Mann's work there. Mann reportedly received around $500,000 from taxpayer-funded grants from the university for research there from 1999 to 2005.
至少弗吉尼亞州的總檢察長肯Cuccinelli這麼認為，並一直努力試圖獲得弗吉尼亞大學文件和電子郵件，相關曼恩在那裡工作的。據報導，曼恩在1999年至2005年收到從大學的納稅人資助撥款大約 50萬美元作研究。
Cuccinelli is alleging a possible violation of a 2002 statute, the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act. The AG has said that he wants the documents, including grant applications and e-mails exchanged between Mann and 39 other scientists and university staffers, to help determine whether Mann committed fraud by knowingly manipulating data as he sought the taxpayer-funded grants for his research.
Cuccinelli可能是指控一項2002年的法令違反 - 弗吉尼亞欺詐針對納稅人法令。總檢察長曾表示，他想要的文件，包括撥款申請和在曼恩及其他39名科學家和大學員工之間的電子郵件交換，以幫助確定曼恩是否故意操縱數據犯欺詐，因為他尋求納稅人資助撥款作他的研究。
Mann was at the heart of the ClimateGate scandal when e-mails were unearthed from Britain's Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. In one e-mail sent to Mann and others by CRU director Philip Jones, Jones speaks of the "trick" of filling in gaps of data in order to hide evidence of temperature decline:
曼恩是在氣候門醜聞的心臟，當電子郵件從英國東英吉利大學的氣候研究小組出土。在一封由CRU主任菲利普瓊斯發送到曼恩和其他人的電子郵件，瓊斯講及“絕招“以填補數據的空白，以圖隱藏溫度下降的證據：
"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e. from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline." It was that attempt to "hide the decline" through the manipulation of data that brought down the global warming house of cards.

Mann was the architect behind the famous "hockey stick" graph that was produced in 1999 but which really should be called the "hokey stick." Developed by Mann using manipulated tree-ring data, it supposedly proved that air temperatures had been stable for 900 years, then soared off the charts in the 20th century.

Mann et al. had to make the Medieval Warm Period (about A.D. 800 to 1400) and the Little Ice Age (A.D. 1600 to 1850) statistically disappear.

The graph relied on data from trees on the Yamal Peninsula in Siberia. Here, too, the results were carefully selected. Just 12 trees from the 252 cores in the CRU's Yamal data set were used. A larger data set of 34 tree cores from the vicinity showed no dramatic recent warming, and warmer temperatures in the middle ages. They were not included.

Attempting to block Cuccinelli and rising to Mann's defense are Virginia state senators Chap Petersen and Donald McEachin. They are backing legislation that would strip the attorney general's office of its power to issue "civil investigative demands," otherwise known as subpoenas, under the 2002 statute.

They claim they are defending academic freedom, but they are trying to hide what many consider academic fraud, work that found its way into the reports of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It led to Kyoto and Copenhagen, and formed the basis for the EPA's endangerment finding that carbon dioxide is a pollutant that needs to be regulated.

After Mann left U.Va., he went to Penn State, which the Obama administration awarded with $541,184 in economic stimulus funds to save, according to recovery.gov, 1.62 jobs so that Professor Mann could continue his tree-ring circus fraudulently advancing the myth of man-made global warming that through equally bogus remedies like cap-and-trade and EPA regulations would bring the U.S. economy to its knees.

In a glaringly arrogant e-mail, Mann said he was grateful to the legislators for pressing the issue and hoped the action would give Cuccinelli "some second thoughts about continuing to waste their time and resources attacking well-established science." Hide the decline, then hide the truth.

We hope the legislation fails, the truth will come out and Mann et al. will be held accountable for engineering a scientific and economic fraud that would have made Bernie Madoff blush.

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=560453&p=2