End Democracy To Save Planet Says IPCC
Jan 6th, 2011 By Keelan Balderson
Translation by Autumnson Blog
A leading professor and member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has proposed that nations need to end democracy in order to solve the theory of man made climate change.一位領先教授和政府間氣候變化專門委員會（IPCC）的成員已建議，各國必須結束民主以解決人為氣候變化的理論。
David Shearman, an Emeritus Professor of Medicine at the University of Adelaide, and a Visiting Research Fellow at the University’s Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences and Law School, has authored several books on climate change, one entitled The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy. In this he declares that “…authoritarianism is the natural state of humanity”.
一位阿德萊德大學的榮休講座醫學教授、以及一位在大學的地理系和環境科學與法學院的客座研究員大衛希爾曼，已撰寫幾本關於氣候變化的書，一本題為氣候變化的挑戰及民主的失敗，在這他宣稱“... 獨裁主義是人類的自然狀態”。
Professor Shearman was an Assessor for the UN’s IPCC 3rd and 4th Assessment Reports.
希爾曼教授是一位聯合國政府間氣候變化專門委員會的第三和第四號評估報告的評估員。
We are often told that the UN is not an authoritarian institution and is only looking to solve world problems, rather than develop a world power system; but it is quite clear that many of the UN’s climate change alarmists have fascist ideologies, which could use the UN’s influence to infiltrate democracies.
我們常被告知，聯合國並不是一個專制機構，和只是尋求解決世界問題，而不是開發一個世界權力制度；但它是頗清楚，許多聯合國的氣候變化危言聳聽者有法西斯主義者的意識形態，它可以使用聯合國的影響力去滲透民主政體。
Prof. Shearman’s book makes no attempt to hide it’s fascist ideals. The introduction reads:
In short, Shearman and Smith argue that liberal democracy – considered sacrosanct in modern societies – is an impediment to finding ecologically sustainable solutions for the planet.
希爾曼教授的書沒有試圖隱藏它的法西斯主義者理想。引言如下： 總之，希爾曼和史密斯認為自由民主 - 在現代社會中被視為神聖不可侵犯 - 是一個障礙，以為地球找到生態可持續發展的解決方案。
In other words they think we need fascism to save the planet.
換言之，他們認為我們需要法西斯主義去拯救地球。
Shearman and his co-author Gary Sauer-Thompson, in ‘Green or Gone’ propose the formation of an ‘elite warrior leadership’ to force the people to change their lifestyles.
Government in the future will be based upon . . . a supreme office of the biosphere. The office will comprise specially trained philosopher/ecologists. These guardians will either rule themselves or advise an authoritarian government of policies based on their ecological training and philosophical sensitivities. These guardians will be specially trained for the task. [p. 134]
They advocate training “ecowarriors” at Universities to “battle the enemies of life”.
They even go as far as to ponder the merging of the green movement and the new age movement as a green alternative to Christianity and Islam:
It is not impossible that from the green movement and aspects of the new age movement a religious alternative to Christianity and Islam will emerge. And it is not too difficult to imagine what shape this new religion could take. One would require a transcendent God who could punish and reward – because humans seem to need a carrot and a stick.
One has to wonder if the well-meaning foot soldiers of Green Peace and the like actually understand the twisted and anti-human ideologies of their “climate scientists”.
But of course this is all conspiracy theory, there is no Professor Shearman, he never wrote any books, and the science is still settled
http://wideshut.co.uk/end-democracy-to-save-planet-says-ipcc/
計劃的新世界秩序Opolis: 1984年型式的2040年城市生活
邪惡之地：喬治亞州石碑
生態納粹運動命令美國人對兒童支付碳稅
沒有留言:
發佈留言