新的奧巴馬出生證明是膺品

欺詐斷正就大件事了！

新的奧巴馬出生證明是膺品
New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 28, 2011
Translation by Autumnson Blog

Our investigation of the purported Obama birth certificate released by Hawaiian authorities today reveals the document is a shoddily contrived hoax. Infowars.com computer specialists dismissed the document as a fraud soon after examining it.
我們調查今天夏威夷當局發佈傳說的奧巴馬出生證明，結果顯示文件是粗製濫造人為的騙局。 Infowars.com的電腦專家在檢查它後不久駁回該文件為欺詐。
Check out the  document released by WhiteHouse.gov for yourself.
你自己檢查由WhiteHouse.gov發佈的文件。

Upon first inspection, the document appears to be a photocopy taken from state records and printed on official green paper. However, when the government released PDF is taken into the image editing program Adobe Illustrator, we discover a number of separate elements that reveal the document is not a single scan on paper, as one might surmise. Elements are placed in layers or editing boxes over the scan and green textured paper, which is to say the least unusual.
在第一次檢查，該文件似乎是取自州記錄的影印本和印在正式的綠色紙上。然而，當政府發佈的PDF版是要考慮到圖像編輯軟件 Adobe Illustrator，我們發現數個獨立的元素，可顯露該文件並不是單一的紙上掃描文件，正如一個人可能有的猜測。成份被放置在夾層中或在掃描和綠紋紙上的編輯框，那是說至少是不尋常的。
When sections of the document are enlarged significantly, we discover glaring inconsistencies. For instance, it appears the date stamped on the document has been altered. Moreover, the document contains text, numbers, and lines with suspicious white borders indicating these items were pasted from the original scan and dropped over a background image of green paper.
當文件的某些部分被明顯放大，我們發現明顯的不一致。例如，它似乎在文件上蓋章的日期已被更改。此外，該文件包含的文本、數字和界線有可疑的白色邊，表明這些項目是從原來的掃描粘貼過來和落下在綠紙的背景影像上。

PROOF!!! Obama Birth Certificate Fraud
證據！奧巴馬出生證明欺詐
2011-04-27

Let’s assume the state of Hawaii scanned the original document and placed it on the green textured background. This does not explain the broken out or separate elements. There is no logical reason for this to be done unless the government planned to modify the document and make it appear to be something other than it is.

There are two elements of interest, as shown in the image to the above – both entries for the date accepted by the local registry. This appears to have been modified in an image editing program.

The media was quick to dispel the fact the document was modified. “Our analysis of the latest controversy: The original birth certificate was probably in a ‘negative’ form, and someone at the White House took it upon themselves to doctor it up so the form can be readable,” writesJoe Brooks for Wireupdate.

Nathan Goulding, writing for the National Review, tells us anybody can open the White House released PDF in Illustrator and it will break out into layers. “I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home,” he writes.

Indeed, but this does not answer the question why in the Obama birth certificate PDF the layers or elements contain dates – which appear to be modified – and the signature of the state registrar. If the document was acquired from state records in whole, why was it necessary to add elements? Goulding and Brooks do not address this issue.

These layers are also revealed by the White House issued PDF’s hex file in freeware hex editor. Within its code are listed 8 image masks, which if changed from value “true” to “false” turn off and on to reveal the layers as demonstrated in the video and in Illustrator. Whether these represent compression artifacts or other digitizing processes, or whether these masks represent deliberate manipulation remains to be conclusively shown.

<< /Length 17 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 123 /Height 228 /ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >> << /Length 13 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 199 /Height 778 /ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
<< /Length 19 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 47 /Height 216 /ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>


<< /Length 15 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 42 /Height 274 /ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>


<< /Length 10 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 1454 /Height 1819 /ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>


<< /Length 25 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 132 /Height 142 /ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>


<< /Length 23 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 243 /Height 217 /ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>


<< /Length 21 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 34 /Height 70 /ImageMask true /BitsPerComponent 1 /Filter /FlateDecode >>

As Market-Ticker.org points out, it may prove to be significant that two of the boxes appear over both of the “date accepted” boxes, as well as the “Mother’s occupation box.” Was there a need to tamper with the dates on the document or other areas? The recent stamp date and issuing signature of the state registrar also contain an edited layer.

Questions have also been raised about the number at the top of the document issued by the Department of Health, number 61 10641, as one part of the number is in a separate layer when viewed in Illustrator, as demonstrated in the video above. This may prove to be significant. A long form birth  certificate obtained by the Honolulu Star in 2009 from a female born one day after Obama and whose form was accepted three days after Obama’s document contains a Dept. of Health number that is lower, 61 10637. There are other subtle differences, such as the use of “Aug.” for the date rather than “August,” and the use of “Honolulu, Oahu” rather than “Honolulu, Hawaii” (seen also in the 1962 certificate below) which may or may not be significant.

More to the point, this certificate and others, like the one posted below it, have visible seals. No issuing seal can be seen on the document released today by Obama.
Negative of long form birth certificate for Aug. 5, 1961 birth in Honolulu, released in 1966 with seal and dated signatures.Published by Honolulu Star and World Net Daily in 2009.

Photo of physical copy of long form birth certificate for June 15, 1962 birth in Honolulu, also with visible seal.
長格式出生證書的實體拷貝的照片給1962年6月15日在檀香山的出生，亦可見到封印。

Infowars will continue to analyze this issue as more information comes in. It is significant that the Obama Administration was pressured into responding to this controversy, whatever the final analysis of this document. However, the administration still needs to release his other records which have been sealed at great expense. Is there an issue with his being naturalized in Indonesia? Why are his college records at Columbia and Occidental sealed, and what do they contain? Did Obama travel to Pakistan on a foreign passport? These questions and many others have not been properly answered.

Aaron Dykes contributed to this report.

http://www.infowars.com/new-obama-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/

夏威夷無法出具奧巴馬出生証明 陰謀論仍將繼續

奧巴馬公開出生證澄清出生地傳言

白宮晚宴奧巴馬打趣億萬富翁特朗普

911受害者不滿拉登被海葬 稱應該埋在世貿垃圾場

華盛頓時報： 新公佈的奧巴馬出生證明是法庭的膺品

證實：奧巴馬的出生證明並非真實

奧巴馬律師 - 出生證明無關緊要