國家醫療保健法案包括植入 RFID晶片？

國家醫療保健將要求國民 RFID晶片...植入皮膚？
National Healthcare Will Require National RFID Chips ...placed into the skin?
Topic started on 26-3-2010 @ 03:09 PM by Jessicamsa

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3200/text

The Obama Health care bill under Class II (Paragraph 1, Section B) specifically includes in it's lists of things that must be in registered in the NATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTRY: ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable."
奧巴馬衛生保健法案第II類（第1段，B節）具體地在它的列出東西包括，必須註冊在國民醫療装置註冊處：''（二）一項可植入的II級裝置。“
Then on page 1004 it describes what the term "data" means in paragraph 1, section B:
然後在 1004頁它在第1段，B節描述字眼“數據”的意思：

14 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to in
15formation respecting a device described in paragraph (1),
16 including claims data, patient survey data, standardized
17 analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of
18 data from disparate data environments, electronic health
19 records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the
20 Secretary"
14 ''（B）在本段中，術語'數據'是指在
15構成物關於一項裝置在段（1）所述
16包括索賠數據、病人調查數據，標準化
17分析的文件以便匯集和分析
18數據來自不同的數據環境，電子健康
19記錄，和任何其它數據視為適當的被
20部長“

What exactly is a class II device that is implantable?
究竟什麼正確是可植入的II級裝置？
Approved by the FDA, a class II implantable device is a "implantable radiofrequency transponder system for patient identification and health information." The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as "claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary."
得 美國藥檢局批准，一個可植入的二級裝置是一種“用以識別病者和健康資料的可植入射頻收發機系統。”二級裝置的目的是收集醫療病人的數據，例如“索賠資料、病人調查數據，標準化分析的文件以便從不同的數據環境能夠匯集和作數據分析，電子健康記錄，和任何其它部長視為適當的數據。“

So, if this is true then the bill requires Americans to be chipped? I am not sure my interpretation is totally accurate, but that is my interpretation. However, if it is true, then why haven't opponents to this bill been more vocal about that?
因此如果這是真的，那麼法案是要求美國人被植入晶片？我不肯定我的演譯是完全正確，但那就是我的解釋。不過，如果它是真的，那麼為什麼這一法案的反對者沒有對此更大聲疾呼呢？
What are your thoughts?
你們的想法是什麼？
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread555605/pg1

微型晶片被包括在保健法案內？

大藥廠開始在藥物植入晶片