NASA Photos Confirm Moon is Artificial?
2010年12月19日 下午 08:56:01
by Zen Gardner
Translation by Autumnson Blog
According to David Icke's postulation regarding the Moon Matrix, and based on the research of many others who've studied the moon's many anomalies, the moon is an artificial orb that was pulled here for specific gravitational and other earth controlling purposes.
據大衛艾奇關於月球矩陣的假設，並根據許多人其它人的研究，他們已研究出月球的許多異常，月亮是一個人做的圓球，它被拉到這裡為特定的引力和其它控制地球的用途。
The recent striking NASA photos of the moon give a very clear impression.
最近的引人注目美國宇航局月球照片給出一個很清晰的印象。
First, it's obvious the moon is hardly geographically similar to the earth. You see no huge irregular ridges like earth's massive mountain ranges or deep trenches such as those within our oceans. (see photos below)
首先，它是明顯月亮是難以在地理上類似地球，你看不見巨大的不規則脊地像地球連綿起伏的山脈或深溝，例如那些在我們海洋中的。 （見下面照片）
But even more than that, the moon very much does look like a metallic sphere with a dust covering that has been hit many times over but only to a specific depth--much like the affect of rain drops on a hard surface with a substantial covering of dust.
但甚至比那更多，月亮確看起來非常像一個金屬球上面以灰塵覆蓋，那已被擊中許多次但只是對一特定的深度 - 很像雨滴的影響在堅硬而覆蓋有大量灰塵的表面。
Here's the new NASA photo and story:
這裡是新的美國航天局照片和故事：
說芝士！美國宇航局捕捉月亮遠方令人驚嘆的圖像
Say cheese! NASA captures stunning images of the far side of the moon
These amazing pictures capture the moon's cratered surface in the most intricate detail ever recorded.
這些驚人的照片捕捉月球的隕石坑表面，有記錄以來最複雜的細節。
The images, which were taken by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), have boosted the resolution of images of the far side of the moon over 100 times.
那些圖像，由美國宇航局的月球偵察軌道器（LRO）拍攝，已提高月亮遠邊圖像的解像度超過 100倍。
Digital elevation and terrain maps based on the new data reveal the heavily cratered and bumpy surface of the moon in all its complexity.
數碼海拔和地勢圖奠基於新數據，揭示嚴重地隕石撞擊和顛簸的月球表面，有齊所有的複雜性。
(Read more here)（這裡閱讀更多內容）
Now contrast that with the irregular contours of the earth:
現在比對那有不規則輪廓的地球：
Not very regular...
不很規則...
Again, very irregular. Topographical satellite mapping from science.co.il
再次，極不規則。從 science.co.il的地形衛星測繪
I don't know. But it's hard to see how the moon broke off from the earth and it remained a perfect sphere with hundreds of huge raindrop type pock marks, while the earth is this convoluted, seemingly traumatized molten rock in comparison - and with hardly any visible craters.
其它異常
Other Anomalies
The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminent scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, made the statement, 'A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object'. But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite---and therefore artificial.
鈴響像鐘
Rings Like A Bell
Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow ob-ject' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. (Source)
And why does the moon have hundreds of massive craters, while the earth has hardly any in comparison? I know our atmosphere burns some up, but those marks indicate some pretty big shots it's taken, never mind the quantity.
你知不知道火山口底部是凸狀而不是凹狀？
Did you Know the Crater Bottoms Are Convex Instead of Concave?
It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal---which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick---mostly metal. (Source)
那麼？
So?
Are the meteor pockmarks from the trek over here from wherever the moon was built? It is evidence of space warfare activities here or in other parts of the Universe?
I don't know if it was brought here or who lives on or in it, but I don't buy the party line. There's a lot going on out there and those who could confirm a lot more information for us won't. Thankfully wonderful research is being made, and some 'in the know' are speaking up, and the dots are connecting.
Something to think about.
Just wondering. Zen
衹是奇怪.Zen
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/317/206/NASA_Photos_Confirm_Moon_is_Artificial.html
沒有留言:
發佈留言