搜尋此網誌

2010年12月2日星期四

S510食物安全條例草案現在一池死水,由於藍單錯誤

S510食物安全條例草案現在一池死水,由於藍單錯誤
S510 Food Safety bill now dead in the water due to blue slip mistake

Wednesday, December 01, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) It is now being revealed that US Senators slipped up in a big way when passing the Food Safety Modernization Act on Tuesday: They added what are effectively "new taxes" into the bill, and according to the U.S. Constitution, only the House of Representatives can initiate legislation requiring new taxes.
(NaturalNews)它現在正被透露美國參議員大大滑倒,當在星期二通過食品安全現代化法案時:他們加入了有效的“新稅項”在條例草案,而根據美國憲法,只有眾議院的代表能提出要求新稅的立法。
Thus, the House is now obliged to give this food safety legislation the so-called "blue slip," meaning that it rejects the law and sends it back to the Senate for yet another vote. This would take time and effort, of course, and the Democrats have very little of either remaining in their lame duck session.
因此,議院現在是必須要給這食物安全法例所謂的“藍單”,意思是它拒絕了法律並將它發回給參議院作另一次投票。這將需要時間和努力,當然,和民主黨是旦一樣都已有很少剩下,在他們的跛脚鴨時段。
As explained on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_slip):

"This blue-slipping procedure, done by an order of the House, is routinely completed to enforce its interpretation that the House is the sole body to introduce revenue or appropriations legislation. The failure of the House to consider the legislation means it cannot become a law. This tactic has historically proven to be of great use to the House and, as a practical matter, the Senate does not introduce tax or revenue measures to avoid a blue slip."

In other words, the House wants to remain the sole originator of all new taxes and will therefore need to "blue slip" S.510 in order to slap the hands of Senators who are trying to enact their own new taxes under the bill.

S.510可能死在水裡
S.510 may be dead in the water

The upshot of this is that this fight is not yet over. Unless the House makes an unprecedented exception to this blue slip rule, this legislation will apparently need to go back to the Senate floor for another vote.

This story was first reported by RollCall.com (http://www.rollcall.com/news/-20101...) which says, "The debacle could prove to be a major embarrassment for Senate Democrats, who sought Tuesday to make the relatively unknown bill a major political issue by sending out numerous news releases trumpeting its passage." (http://www.rollcall.com/news/-20101...)

According to Roll Call, "The blue slip could lead to one of two likely outcomes. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) could simply drop the issue and let the next session of Congress start from scratch..."

"Or he could try to force the issue in the Senate after the House passes a new version of the bill. But in order to do that and still tackle the other issues, he would need a unanimous consent agreement to limit debate."

But unanimous consent is impossible thanks to the heroic efforts of Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla) who has stood firm on his belief that this bill is too large, too expensive and puts too much of a burden on American farmers.

If this assessment is correct, it looks like S.510 is now dead in the water and cannot be resurrected until the next session of Congress in which there will be far fewer Democrats (there was not a single Democrat in the US Senate who opposed the bill). (http://www.naturalnews.com/030577_S...)

http://www.naturalnews.com/030588_Food_Safety_bill_blue_slip.html

產業購買國會選票以通過S510食物安全條例草案

S510食品安全偷襲!一致同意通過

沒有留言: